Jump to content

WADA shuts down Bloem lab


gummibear

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Drug lab gets shut down.

 

BS be like

 

http://s2.quickmeme.com/img/e3/e378bcb34eb4120fa0e5836a5c5e88c1630e38519e207e2993f6d329b50f0ace.jpg

Posted

Drug lab gets shut down.

 

BS be like

 

http://s2.quickmeme.com/img/e3/e378bcb34eb4120fa0e5836a5c5e88c1630e38519e207e2993f6d329b50f0ace.jpg

????????????
Posted

I wonder what the motivation behind this was.

 

Was it a case of blatant falsifying of test?

Was it purely substandard testing?

Political interference?

 

Whatever, this is not very good.

 

 

its actually very easy for any accredited lab to loose that accreditation. ASTM requires labs to be a participant to the ASTm Round Robin testing where they send outblind samples annually and labs are then requested to test certain properties. The results have to fall within reproducibility of the test method.

costs of maintaining accreditation have increased sinceMr Zpta opened his mouth and fored mr Nene in December, the the loss of accreditation could be attributed to many thing including;

 

- hasn;t paid membership fees for 2016

- hasn't returned blind sample results within time limits

- results of blind samples fall outside of reproducibility limits

- procedures not followed over key test methods that has resulted in skewed data.

- high or low bias of results against the norm for test methods.

 

It would not be a competancy problem since the lab has already been accredited in the past.

it is very likely a procedural issue

Posted

its actually very easy for any accredited lab to loose that accreditation. ASTM requires labs to be a participant to the ASTm Round Robin testing where they send outblind samples annually and labs are then requested to test certain properties. The results have to fall within reproducibility of the test method.

costs of maintaining accreditation have increased sinceMr Zpta opened his mouth and fored mr Nene in December, the the loss of accreditation could be attributed to many thing including;

 

- hasn;t paid membership fees for 2016

- hasn't returned blind sample results within time limits

- results of blind samples fall outside of reproducibility limits

- procedures not followed over key test methods that has resulted in skewed data.

- high or low bias of results against the norm for test methods.

 

It would not be a competancy problem since the lab has already been accredited in the past.

it is very likely a procedural issue

Don't forget the paperwork, or lack thereof.

Part of any ISO-system is to keep documentation (procedures, processes, CA, PA, SOP, etc.) up to date, and includes historical record keeping.

 

About the competency issue - someone at the lab had passed away around the time of the gel filling pharmacist (Durban) issue, so they may have struggled to find a competent replacement. Who knows?

Posted

I would actually like for them to publish a list of riders tested after each event/weekly basis and then their results once they are available ... total transparency is needed for us to even think of trusting the system.

 

Also a list of TUE's issued

 

 

And they must not say Oh but people will jump to conclusions.. they lost the right to privacy the day they looked the other way with athletes of all sports

Posted

Mmmmm the plot thickens ...

 

"The only Wada-recognised facility in Africa, the Bloemfontein Laboratory, became the latest to be ordered to cease analysis of athletes’ blood and urine samples after being caught reporting false positives or negatives."

 

"Like those in Beijing and Lisbon, the Bloemfontein lab failed at least one of several regular audits by Wada, which assesses the accuracy of labs’ analysis by secretly sending them samples it already knows to be positive or negative."

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/olympics/2016/05/03/wada-steps-in-to-suspend-african-labs-accreditation/

Posted

Mmmmm the plot thickens ...

 

"The only Wada-recognised facility in Africa, the Bloemfontein Laboratory, became the latest to be ordered to cease analysis of athletes’ blood and urine samples after being caught reporting false positives or negatives."

 

"Like those in Beijing and Lisbon, the Bloemfontein lab failed at least one of several regular audits by Wada, which assesses the accuracy of labs’ analysis by secretly sending them samples it already knows to be positive or negative."

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/olympics/2016/05/03/wada-steps-in-to-suspend-african-labs-accreditation/

 

Would love to know the period/s that audit/s were done during? Would it negate the lab's results during those times? 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout