Jump to content

Why ever does This Happen


cyclingronaldo

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Why go anatomic when you can go atomic

 

"Hey there, big boy! Is that a phallus-shaped clump of congealed tyre sealant in your bib or are you just happy to see me?"

Posted

I had the same problem in my kids bikes with Slime that I put in a normal tube. The normal slime like Stans are much better though. Can put in in via the valve with a bit of work. Tubeless still the best option if you can.

Posted

Slime tubes are a waste of time IMHO. If you get a foreign object in your tyre the movement between tyre and tube will allow leakage, and the slime tends to mean that patches don't stick once there's a hole.

 

Tubeless or patch kits.

I still reckon slime in tubes is better than a naked inner tube.

 

But tubeless is far far far superior in every way.

 

it's kind of like looking at the rugby championship log to see if we ended up ahead of the Wallabies or not

Posted

These are the important questions of our time.

 

So while getting all serious and stuff ....

 

 

having converted to tubeless out of my own free will, and under no duress from the "tough crowd" .....

 

 

I do carry a spare tube on tube on rides - should this be WITH or WITHOUT the slime ? ?

 

More to the point, the spare tube is about 1 year old, has never been inflated, and was bought WITH slime in it .... as the sales-executive assured me THAT is what I wanted ....

 

 

 

So, all jokes aside - will this be okay in a month or two years when I do get that cut in the tubeless and have to resort to using the tube ?

Posted

This is what happened to my Friend's tube while riding the Karoo to Coast. Would really like to know if this is a regular occurance while riding? attachicon.gifphoto_2017-10-09_11-20-57.jpg

Not sure about that, but generally people all ride tubeless these days. I have seen tubes with sealant in where the tube sticks to itself or seals up the valve. Tell you friend to invest in a tubeless conversation and to add some  Foamo! The guys here forgot to tell you about foamo, huck norris and cush core.

Posted

So while getting all serious and stuff ....

 

 

having converted to tubeless out of my own free will, and under no duress from the "tough crowd" .....

 

 

I do carry a spare tube on tube on rides - should this be WITH or WITHOUT the slime ? ?

 

More to the point, the spare tube is about 1 year old, has never been inflated, and was bought WITH slime in it .... as the sales-executive assured me THAT is what I wanted ....

 

 

 

So, all jokes aside - will this be okay in a month or two years when I do get that cut in the tubeless and have to resort to using the tube ?

I have had to throw away unused tubes (without slime) after about 18 months simply because they perish. I have now resolved to inflate the spare tube before each major event just to check  if they're still usable.

Posted

Two sides of the same coin.

 

Those tubes coagulating does seem to happen more often than it should, hence using those tubes is not a good idea. :)

Do you think its brand specific? or in general? the reason I ask is, the problem may be with the sealant more than the application?

I used to always use Slime type sealant in my tubes when I ran tubes, lasted for the life of the tube/tyre, never clumped up and worked like a charm, highly recommended.

 

I think it's the brand of slime that's causing the issue, I had a similar experience with my tubeless setup using a tubeless specific slime type sealant which was poorly manufactured or designed - the particles separate out of the fluid and clump together and the sealant becomes useless thereafter, also once the fluid has separated it becomes thin enough to weep out of the sidewalls etc which results in finding the dry clumps inside the tyre next time it's taken off the rim.

Posted

That looks like the water based slime - age and particularly hot weather dries it out not so much the co2 that affects latex brands. Keep wheels / tubes out of Sun when not riding and as mentioned tubeless is much more reliable and not expensive or particularly difficult to diy with most tyres.

Posted

So while getting all serious and stuff ....

 

 

having converted to tubeless out of my own free will, and under no duress from the "tough crowd" .....

 

 

I do carry a spare tube on tube on rides - should this be WITH or WITHOUT the slime ? ?

 

More to the point, the spare tube is about 1 year old, has never been inflated, and was bought WITH slime in it .... as the sales-executive assured me THAT is what I wanted ....

 

 

 

So, all jokes aside - will this be okay in a month or two years when I do get that cut in the tubeless and have to resort to using the tube ?

Its simple I think.

 

1: Convert to tubeless

2: When riding on normal MTB trails, take a spare normal tube and a big bomb (duck tape said items to set post or frame, stay away from saddle bags, its my duty to society to make that comment)

3: When riding is super thorny places like Tour de Tuli, take 1 x normal tube, 1 x slimey tube and 2 x big bombs. Again stay away from saddle bags or Camelbaks. They made me wear one on the two occasions I rode that tour and I still feel gross.

 

I never used my slimey tubes, and I found them recently, the slime still feels ok inside, been a year now, so to answer your question, and to reiterate what I said earlier, they are cool as backup (get me home) items, but I wouldn't use them as a day to day items.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout