Jump to content

Little hub study related to heart rates


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 160
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
  On 8/27/2016 at 12:34 PM, Pikey said:

1:pikey

2:68- me thinks..according to watch

3:195

4:45

5:Capricorn

6:meat & 2 veg

7: Rouxtjie might approve - maybe !

Funny!

Posted

Name: zakattack (what my boss calls me at the office, not the one at home)
Resting - 46
Max - 197 (thought this figure was a bit high, but seeing some of you okes and ladies that are more or less my age, now seems to make sense)
Age - 36
Appendage - Yes, a winky
Star sign - Aquarius (don't follow star sign rubbish though)
Post count - 700odd (can't see on a mobile device)

Posted
  On 8/27/2016 at 11:54 AM, Christofison said:

 

Answering for an abnormal friend, just to skew the results a bit:

1. Name: Mark

2. Resting HR: 66

3. Max HR: 244

4. Age: 30

5. Star Sign: :huh:

6. Sex: Male

7. Hub Posts: 0

Can that max be right? ????????

Posted
  On 8/27/2016 at 3:19 PM, ZakAttak said:

Can that max be right?

Frighteningly high. But someone else in this thread as a resting heart rate resembling a corpse so it is nice to have outliers on opposite ends of the spectrum.

Posted

Interestingly..... From a world wide perspective the lowest recorded hr is known, but not the highest..... Lowest is 26 and before this was 28 belonging to Migual Indurain.

When recording max hr it's important that it's a steady hr for a few seconds and not a short spike.

Posted
  On 8/27/2016 at 3:19 PM, ZakAttak said:

Can that max be right?

 

  On 8/27/2016 at 3:39 PM, pe3nguin said:

Frighteningly high. But someone else in this thread as a resting heart rate resembling a corpse so it is nice to have outliers on opposite ends of the spectrum.

 

No but seriously? Somehow undead hubbers are more believable to me. I hope it's either a typo or a malfunctioning of HR recording equipment   :eek:

Posted

Robojedi

ResTesting hr . 48 as per my fenix hr

Maximum . Got it up to 205 before

Age male 35 yrs... 36 in 2 weeks

Star... dint believe in that crap, but born sept

Hub posts. No idea

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
  On 8/27/2016 at 4:15 PM, Koei said:

No but seriously? Somehow undead hubbers are more believable to me. I hope it's either a typo or a malfunctioning of HR recording equipment :eek:

I doubt that such a high heart rate would allow sufficient filling time for the ventricles, possibly leading to a counterproductive reduction in cardiac output (and ultimately performance)

Posted
  On 8/27/2016 at 4:06 PM, SwissVan said:

Interestingly..... From a world wide perspective the lowest recorded hr is known, but not the highest..... Lowest is 26 and before this was 28 belonging to Migual Indurain.

When recording max hr it's important that it's a steady hr for a few seconds and not a short spike.

These low heart rates excludes people with pathology, which I am unfortunately not

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout