Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I think I read somewhere the Chinese are the worlds biggest consumers of pork?

Biggest decimating nation on earth as well in my opinion...

 

Indeed. They've had a shortage too. Half the worlds pigs are in China, and they've been hit hard by African swine fever - as has Eastern Europe and us to a lesser degree.

  • Replies 3.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I saw this funny little jab at carnivores on Facebook...

 

 

Clean the oceans to save the fish.

 

Yay we saved the fish.

 

Let's eat them.

Clean fish taste better

Posted

I accept your POV. However mine is ...

 

If the pig was raised on a good traditional farm and then slaughtered in the correct manner I don’t see anything wrong with your friends posts.

Your post made me think of this.

 

post-18409-15704299729349.jpg

Posted

It doesnt really work that way. Your post is an "all or nothing" approach.

 

It is unreasonable to assume that in one instant every person on the planet will stop eating meat. It will be a gradual process that takes place over time. The laws of supply and demand indicate that less and less animals will be born to supply the lessening demand. 

 

Gradually, the farmers will transform their land from animal agriculture to plants. Those growing plants for animal feed will switch to human food.

 

Again, the laws of supply and demand will take over.

 

The issue is changing the demand. As more people take up a plant based diet, or even a meat reduced diet (they are not the same thing) the market will adapt. 

 

I totally get you Wayne Potgieter, if everyone stopped eating meat all at once it would be a global catastrophe.

 

Gradually eating a few species into extinction is the best solution. A good vegan moral and ethical choice. Of course the animal exploitation, abuse, rights violation and suffering will continue for a while to come, but some sacrifices need to be made for the overall good of humanity and saving the planet.

 

As with the t1t groping analogy, it is okay to carry on groping t1ts as long as there is a concerted effort to reducing t1t groping over time, as the owner of the t1ts being violated will fully understand and recognize that this is all part of their eventual liberation.

Posted

I totally get you Wayne Potgieter, if everyone stopped eating meat all at once it would be a global catastrophe.

 

Gradually eating a few species into extinction is the best solution. A good vegan moral and ethical choice. Of course the animal exploitation, abuse, rights violation and suffering will continue for a while to come, but some sacrifices need to be made for the overall good of humanity and saving the planet.

 

As with the t1t groping analogy, it is okay to carry on groping t1ts as long as there is a concerted effort to reducing t1t groping over time, as the owner of the t1ts being violated will fully understand and recognize that this is all part of their eventual liberation.

Are you ok?

 

Nothing in your post references my post. Based on your nonsensical response and your signature on your profile, I am genuinely starting to think you are trolling purely for the sake of it.

 

Its a shame, I enjoy debate and information sharing. Its a total shame that you are not participating in a well mannered and genuine debate that will hopefully lead to a better understanding for us all.

 

If I have misunderstood you and my opinion is incorrect, then please educate me as to why you are not trolling and contribute to the discussion in a meaningful way. 

Posted
This July, we were all reminded about the same messages we’ve already heard: invest in reusable water bottles and coffee mugs, swap out plastic shopping bags for a cloth “bag for life”, and refuse single-use plastics, especially straws. The list goes on.
 
Of course, all of these efforts are worthwhile to incorporate into your daily lives. Plastic waste is clearly one of the most pressing – and visible – issues affecting our oceans and marine wildlife. Humans produce so much plastic each year that it weighs as much as the entire human race combined. And, despite our best efforts to “refuse, reduce, reuse, and recycle,” 91% of plastic waste never gets recycled.
 
Instead of decomposing or biodegrading as many claim, plastics in the ocean in fact break up into smaller and smaller pieces, eventually becoming microplastics so small the human eye can no longer see. There is no "away" with plastic; every piece of plastic ever produced is still on the planet today. More than 90% of seabirds have plastic in their guts, and researchers are predicting the ocean will contain more plastic than fish in weight by 2050 unless we act now.
 
But despite what most people think, common consumer plastics like cotton ear buds, throwaway cutlery, and shampoo bottles aren’t actually the biggest culprits.
 
The single biggest single source of plastic choking out the life in our oceans is made up of purposefully or accidentally lost, discarded, or abandoned fishing nets, ropes, FADs (fish aggregating devices), long lines, and plastic fishing crates and baskets.

“At least half of [...ocean plastic waste] is not consumer plastics, which are central to much of the current debate, but fishing gear.”
 
George Leonard, chief scientist at the Ocean Conservancy.

 

 

 
 
Approximately 46% of the 79 thousand tons of ocean plastic in the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is made up of fishing nets, some as large as football fields, according to the study published in March 2018 in Scientific Reports, which shocked the researchers themselves who expected the percentage to be closer to 20%. 
 
Fishing nets lost, abandoned or discarded at sea – also known as “ghost nets” – can continue killing indiscriminately for decades and decades, entangling or suffocating countless fish, sharks, whales, dolphins, sea turtles, seals and marine birds every year. An estimated 30% percent of the decline in some fish populations is a result of discarded fishing equipment, while more than 70% of marine animal entanglements involve abandoned plastic fishing nets.
 
 
sea_lion_marine_trash.jpg__760x505_q85_c
A sea lion strangled by fishing gear. Photo by Sea Shepherd.
 
Sea Shepherd crew and volunteers on campaigns around the world are daily witnesses to the devastation caused by this fishing gear. On Operation Icefish in 2014, while Sea Shepherd’s Bob Barker chased down the notorious toothfish poaching vessel Thunder for 110 days until they scuttled their own vessel, the crew of the Sam Simon stayed behind in the freezing Southern Ocean, spending weeks hauling in the 72km-long gillnet abandoned by poachers as they fled. On five consecutive campaigns for Operation Milagro in the Sea of Cortez, our crew retrieved over 180km of ghost nets in addition to the illegal fishing nets responsible for killing the critically endangered vaquita porpoise. In 2015 Sea Shepherd France launched Operation Mare Nostrum to remove ghost nets from the Mediterranean Sea, where they even recovered an abandoned trawling net in a protected marine area just off the coast of France where all fishing is prohibited. Last year Sea Shepherd UK launched Operation Ghostnet, an ongoing campaign using small fast boats and divers to remove hazardous ghost nets and other abandoned fishing gear from coastal areas around England, Scotland, and Wales. Operation Siso, Sea Shepherd’s campaign to confiscate illegal fishing gear found off Italy’s Mediterranean coast, was named for the young sperm whale whose migration past the Aeolian Islands ended when he became entangled in a driftnet and died. In August last year, around 300 endangered sea turtles were discovered dead off Mexico’s southern coast, trapped in a single abandoned fishing net.
 
 
 
190312-tfj-cape_verde_biosfera-dscf9920.
 
 
 
What Can You Do to Take Action?
 
Your generous donations help Sea Shepherd continue these vital campaigns to remove this deadly fishing gear from our oceans. You can also participate in your local Sea Shepherd chapter beach clean-ups (Important note: never try and retrieve abandoned fishing gear from the water yourself, it can be extremely dangerous for you and even harmful for the wildlife trapped in it; alert your local authorities if you spot one).
 
But wouldn’t it be better to stop this industrial fishing gear from polluting our waters in the first place? We’re working to stop plastic bottles from reaching the waters by finding alternatives and reducing plastic bags by banning them at the supermarket checkout. So how do we stop the flood of abandoned fishing gear in our oceans? Is there really any other way to stop fishing gear from suffocating our seas than by stopping it at the source? Governments can (and should) take all kinds of measures to prevent fishing gear from further polluting the oceans, and Sea Shepherd will continue to hunt down and help stop illegal fishing operations while pulling up illegal fishing gear wherever we encounter it. But each and every consumer has the power to make a difference.
 
The UK’s Guardian newspaper recently noted the hypocrisy in media condemnation of single-use plastic while “the most important factor… we talk about least.” Is this silence due to mainstream media not wanting to upset the economic interests of the commercial fishing industry, or because by addressing the issue it means consumers will connect the dots…back to themselves?
 
Is there really a better way of cutting down the demand for fish – and the massive industry it supports – than by reducing or completing cutting fish from our diets? It might be hard to discuss, it might feel like you’re swimming upstream, but it may be the best way for each individual to make the most impact in addition to avoiding single-use plastics. If we really care about the problem of plastic in the oceans, we need to address the issue of fishing gear. And until we come up with better options, that means dropping fish from the menu.
 
Posted

i must say I would struggle with a full vegan diet, but i would gladly support a ban on all fishing and fish products. unlike farming / hunting etc where we generally replace what we take, with fishing we just take and destroy

Posted

i must say I would struggle with a full vegan diet, but i would gladly support a ban on all fishing and fish products. unlike farming / hunting etc where we generally replace what we take, with fishing we just take and destroy

 

Fishing is an absolute scourge. It 'takes' in so many ways. 

Posted

Most commercial Fishing is an absolute scourge. It 'takes' in so many ways. 

If I can add the red bit above, I'd happily agree with you. :)

Posted

If I can add the red bit above, I'd happily agree with you. :)

i dont know - you just need to go snorkelling around popular fishing holes to see the mess they are left in. evey time a fishermen gets stuck and breaks his line, the line and hook are left in the water to cause havock. sharks etc that are caught and nor wanted are just left to die.i am an ex fisherman and come from a fishing family and i am really starting to struggle with the concept. 

 

I had a discussion with a family member the other day about catch and release. even that to me is bull****. i reckon more than half of the fish that re released die anyway from their injuries or just plain fatigue. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout