Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Done a month of vegetarianism. Feel good. I was thinking I’ll lose weight tho...

 

How much dairy / eggs are you still eating. It's calorically dense foods, so don't underestimate it. 

 

Try and maximise whole foods - grains, veggies, legumes, etc. if you're trying to shed a few kg's. 

Posted

Stop eating fish. It’s the only way to save the life in our seas

 

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/may/09/seas-stop-eating-fish-fishing-industry-government?utm_term=Autofeed&CMP=twt_gu&utm_medium=&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1557379122

 

It is the most important news humanity has ever received: the general collapse of life on Earth. The vast international assessment of the state of nature, as revealed on Monday, tells us that the living planet is in a death spiral. Yet it’s hardly surprising that it appeared on few front pages of British newspapers. Of all the varieties of media bias, the deepest is the bias against relevance. The more important the issue, the less it is discussed.

There’s a reason for this. Were we to become fully aware of our predicament, we would demand systemic change. Systemic change is highly threatening to those who own the media. So they distract us with such baubles as a royal baby and a vicious dispute between neighbours about a patio. I am often told we get the media we deserve. We do not. We get the media its billionaire owners demand.

This means that the first duty of a journalist is to cover neglected issues. So I want to direct you to the 70% of the planet that was sidelined even in the sparse coverage of the new report: the seas. Here, life is collapsing even faster than on land. The main cause, the UN biodiversity report makes clear, is not plastic. It is not pollution, not climate breakdown, not even the acidification of the ocean. It is fishing. Because commercial fishing is the most important factor, this is the one we talk about least. The BBC’s recent Blue Planet Live series, carefully avoiding any collision with powerful interests, epitomised this reticence. There was not a word about the fossil fuel or plastics industries – and only a fleeting reference to the fishing industry, which is protected by a combination of brute power and bucolic fantasy.

When you hear the word fisherman, what picture comes to mind? Someone who looks like Captain Birdseye: white beard, twinkly eyes, sitting on a little red boat chugging merrily across a sparkling sea? If so, your image of the industry might need updating. An investigation by Greenpeace last year revealed that 29% of the UK’s fishing quota is owned by five families, all of whom feature on the Sunday Times Rich List. A single Dutch multinational, operating a vast fishing ship, holds a further 24% of the English quota. The smallest boats – less than 10 metres long – comprise 79% of the fleet, but are entitled to catch just 2% of the fish.

2835.jpg?width=300&quality=85&auto=forma
 ‘Fish farming has even greater impacts, as fish and prawns are often fed on entire marine ecosystems: indiscriminate trawlers dredge up everything and mash it into fishmeal.’ Photograph: Anadolu Agency/Getty Images

 

The same applies worldwide: huge ships from rich nations mop up the fishsurrounding poor nations, depriving hundreds of millions of their major source of protein, while wiping out sharks, tuna, turtles, albatrosses, dolphins and much of the rest of the life of the seas. Coastal fish farming has even greater impacts, as fish and prawns are often fed on 

: indiscriminate trawlers dredge up everything and mash it into fishmeal.

The high seas – in other words, the oceans beyond the 200-mile national limits – are a lawless realm. Here fishing ships put out lines of hooks up to 75 miles long, which sweep the sea clean of predators and any other animals that encounter them. But even inshore fisheries are disastrously managed, through a combination of lax rules and a catastrophic failure to enforce them.

For a few years, the populations of cod and mackerel around the UK started to recover. We were told we could start eating them again with a clear conscience. Both are now plummeting. Young cod are being illegally discarded (tipped overboard) on an industrial scale, with the result that the legal catch in UK seas is probably being exceeded by roughly one-third. Mackerel in these waters, thanks to the scarcely regulated greed of the fishery, lost its eco label a few weeks ago.

The government claims that 36% of England’s waters are “safeguarded as marine protected areas” (MPAs). But this protection amounts to nothing but lines on the map. Commercial fishing is excluded from less than 0.1% of these fake reserves. A recent paper in the Science journal found that the trawling intensity in European protected areas is higher than in unprotected places. These MPAs are a total farce: their only purpose is to con the public into believing that something is being done.

You might have hoped, in view of the European Union’s failures, that Brexit would provide an opportunity to do things better. It does, but it is not being taken. On the contrary, while the EU will introduce a legal commitment to prevent any fish species from being exploited beyond its replacement rate next year, the UK’s fisheries bill contains no such safeguard. There are no plans to turn our “protected areas” into, er, protected areas. The looting of our seas is likely, if anything, to intensify.

5568.jpg?width=300&quality=85&auto=forma
 ‘An investigation by Greenpeace last year revealed that 29% of the UK’s fishing quota is owned by five families, all of whom feature on the Sunday Times Rich List.’ Photograph: Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images

What makes all this so frustrating is that regulating the fishing industry is both cheap and easy. If commercial fishing were excluded from large areas of the sea, the total catch would be likely, paradoxically, to rise, due to what biologists call the spillover effect. Fish and shellfish breed and grow to large sizes in the reserves, then spill over into surrounding waters. Where seas have been protected in other parts of the world, catches have grown dramatically. As a paper in the journal PLOS Biology shows, even if fishing was banned across the entire high seas – as it should be – the world’s fish catch would rise, as the growing populations would migrate into national waters.

Nor are the rules difficult to enforce. As the World Wide Fund for Nature has shown, fitting every boat over 10 metres that fishes in UK waters with remote monitoring equipment would cost just £5m. Cameras and sensors would record what the boats catch and where, making illegal fishing impossible. But fitting this equipment is voluntary. In other words, it is mandatory to comply with the law to prevent discards, over-quota fishing and fishing in no-take zones, but it is voluntary to fit the equipment that shows whether or not you are complying with the law. Unsurprisingly, fewer than 1% of vessels have agreed to carry the equipment. Given the vast profits to be made by cutting corners, is it any wonder that this industry keeps driving fish populations – and the living systems they support – into collapse?

There are almost no fish or shellfish we can safely eat. Recent scandals suggest that even the Marine Stewardship Council label, which is supposed to reassure us about the fish we buy, is no guarantee of sound practice. For example, the council certified tuna fisheries in which endangered sharks had been caught and finned; and, in UK waters, it has approved scallop dredgingthat rips the seabed to shreds.

 

Until fishing is properly regulated and contained, we should withdraw our consent. Save your plastic bags by all means, but if you really want to make a difference, stop eating fish.

Posted (edited)

In other news Tyson Foods recalled 12 million pounds of chicken in the US. Because of metal being found in the chicken! Metal!

 

They're now going to install frikken x-ray metal detectors in the production line to avoid future such issues. Madness.

 

Edit: perhaps this has less to do with veganism and more to do with WT actual F are we doing to eachother.

Edited by CBlake
Posted

In other news Tyson Foods recalled 12 million pounds of chicken in the US. Because of metal being found in the chicken! Metal!

 

They're now going to install frikken x-ray metal detectors in the production line to avoid future such issues. Madness.

 

Edit: perhaps this has less to do with veganism and more to do with WT actual F are we doing to eachother.

 

Madness. Recalls can happen anywhere, but I'd rather eat food not having to worry too much whether the piece of a corpse on my plate is covered in some asshole bacteria or has pieces of metal in it. 

 

In related news, Tyson offloaded its Beyond Meat shares and will be launching their own plant based protein options. 

 

https://edition.cnn.com/2019/05/06/business/tyson-alternative-protein/index.html

 

Yes, of course Tyson is not acting out of some newfound altruism or concern for the environment or animals, but rather ensuring that they keep up with changing consumer trends. However, if it keeps folks from no longer participating in the needless exploitation of animals, then I'm all for it. 

Posted

In other news Tyson Foods recalled 12 million pounds of chicken in the US. Because of metal being found in the chicken! Metal!

 

They're now going to install frikken x-ray metal detectors in the production line to avoid future such issues. Madness.

 

Edit: perhaps this has less to do with veganism and more to do with WT actual F are we doing to eachother.

Xrays in food production is pretty standard. Woolworths insists on all their suppliers using them.

Posted

If you want to dive into the topic even deeper, have a listen to this podcast: 

 

https://youtu.be/rE93wKm0Ok8

 

It's also on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, etc. 

got bored after about 8 minutes. Soz. but yeah, it's interesting about his plant based meat but after listening to this all, I decided to go online and have a look - the incredible burger being touted and used in some places like Burger King overseas - I found the beyond meat veggie burger online from these people - 2 Beyond Meat plant based burger patties - R160 - are they ******* mad?  

Posted

got bored after about 8 minutes. Soz. but yeah, it's interesting about his plant based meat but after listening to this all, I decided to go online and have a look - the incredible burger being touted and used in some places like Burger King overseas - I found the beyond meat veggie burger online from these people - 2 Beyond Meat plant based burger patties - R160 - are they ******* mad?  

 

He's actually more focused on cellular agriculture, not plant-based meat.  

 

It'll definitely still be expensive at the moment. It's still being made in California and shipped to ZA. We have them here in Belgium too (in the 'meat' aisle nogal) and it's a bit more expensive than organic cow flesh. 

 

With Beyond Meat's killer IPO they should be able to ramp up production and there's even talk of a European facility, which should drive down the prices even more. 

Posted

got bored after about 8 minutes. Soz. but yeah, it's interesting about his plant based meat but after listening to this all, I decided to go online and have a look - the incredible burger being touted and used in some places like Burger King overseas - I found the beyond meat veggie burger online from these people - 2 Beyond Meat plant based burger patties - R160 - are they ******* mad? 

You do know which thread you are on right?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout