Jaquesdp Posted February 4, 2019 Share I know this stupid quastion but i dont know enough to feel better about my purchase lol Specialized epic evo Aliminium 12.7kg So the Alu had XO groupset onno Cleats Specialized Epic Expert Carbon 13.5kg GX Eagle , Carbon rims , Only difference was that the Shimano Cleats was on the Carbon bike already and 2 bottle cages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwissVan Posted February 4, 2019 Share My carbon EVO weighed 12.5 at the LBS when I took delivery.Stock standard XL size, tubes, no computer, one cage no bottle,Time atac pedals Edited February 4, 2019 by SwissVan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterF Posted February 4, 2019 Share There is a considerable weight difference between XO and GX and then add the weight of a set of pedals. A carbon frame is generally only about 200g lighter than a good quality aluminium frame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goodbadugly Posted February 4, 2019 Share There is a considerable weight difference between XO and GX and then add the weight of a set of pedals. A carbon frame is generally only about 200g lighter than a good quality aluminium frame.this Underachiever 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaquesdp Posted February 4, 2019 Share If i work out randomly , same groupset and pedals then Carbon might be 500g or less lighter but can be totally diffrent ride im sure ? Capricorn 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grease_Monkey Posted February 4, 2019 Share You buy carbon for ride feel, not weight savings when it comes to trail bikes. A carbon trail bike has a burlier carbon lay-up than a carbon XC bike, and that makes it around the same weight as an alu bike. My carbon trail frame actually weighs more than any alu frame I have owned. So the weight diff you are seeing probably comes down more to component spec than anything else. Have a look at the tyres too - that adds quite a bit of weight. Edited February 4, 2019 by Grease_Monkey CdT85, MDJ, ChrisF and 2 others 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinnyone Posted February 4, 2019 Share It is a common misconception that carbon is infinitely lighter than Alu... The Trek Emonda ALR (alu) frame was actually lighter than the entry level Emonda S carbon frame by a significant amount...A good quality alu handle bar can be significantly lighter than a "cheap" carbon bar... The benefits of carbon are that in wheels it creates a stiffer rim which handles better, in a frame you can create a unit that incorporates certain handling aspects (better vertical compliance) without sacrificing stiffness... Edited February 4, 2019 by Skinnyone MDJ and Chasing_single_track 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allrounder Posted February 4, 2019 Share My Fuji team SL was lighter than some carbon bikes. Cheap - light - durable. Choose 2. Goes for carbon and alu. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaquesdp Posted February 4, 2019 Share I was just surpirsed was thinking about 1kg lighter hehe. Thanks for input i feel better was scared they filled my Carbon frame with sand or water Edited February 4, 2019 by Jaquesdp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goodbadugly Posted February 4, 2019 Share You buy carbon for ride feel because you want carbon, not weight savings when it comes to trail bikes. A carbon trail bike has a burlier carbon lay-up than a carbon XC bike, and that makes it around the same weight as an alu bike. My carbon trail frame actually weighs more than any alu frame I have owned. So the weight diff you are seeing probably comes down more to component spec than anything else. Have a look at the tyres too - that adds quite a bit of weight., Arries87, Grease_Monkey and Grubscrew 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daniemare Posted February 4, 2019 Share Isn't you wallet ligher though? - That will always make carbon ligher I am sure MDJ, Grubscrew, eddy and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaquesdp Posted February 4, 2019 Share nevermind the wallet , bank account , Girlfriend is pissed , Bank manager up my ass.. beter be worth the ride hehe Duane_Bosch, Arries87 and daniemare 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shebeen Posted February 4, 2019 Share What is the point of comparing the entire bike? if you want to look at alu vs carbon directly, look at the frame weights. The other 80% of the total weight is just clouding the issue Dirkitech, Jacoo, bullet77 and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Fastbastard Mayhem Posted February 4, 2019 Share X0 is significantly lighter than GX when you include the cassette in the equation, and pedals are also not light. Also - primary benefit of carbon is not weight, it's frame stiffness. slickjay007 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJR Posted February 4, 2019 Share ..........Also - primary benefit of carbon is not weight, it's frame stiffness. .......and there I always thought it was for the bragging rights Arries87, MDJ, eddy and 2 others 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etienne_jordaan Posted February 4, 2019 Share Throw the scale away and just ride the bike. Jaquesdp and BigDL 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now