Oh the good old seeding chat again. Dont we just love these! Done with good intentions, but in reality provides bad results. Niklas, yes I do agree with your statement on keeping things level through events and then we will see consistant results. But with that statement you just gave it puts Davids seeding model at flaw. I know that you are friends with him, so you dont want to complain much, but it is super clear that things are wrong when you look at how everyone has been moaning for as long as I have been on this site. The winners time should not get played with on a long route with people with a A seeding winning it. They will need to still adjust for events that has lower seeded people winning. But I have seen races that the winners of the race (david george etc those caliber riders) have had their times knocked back a bit. Now if the best riders in this country are getting that time for the race, no body else in the world is going to better it. Look our riders even beat Lance at the argus So rather at the end of the day, we will all be on the same level, for every event. They can always make groups smaller as they go along again. When is this agm? We need to torch I mean attend this meeting. Getting David (frail) onto the board will be a major bonus for us so that we can have our interests represented internally better. Does anyone know how the written nomination thing works?
