DJR Posted June 8 Posted June 8 14 hours ago, Morph said: My wake-up call says "you have a great bike, but you still can't ride for ****" It hurts even worse! justinafrika, Stoffel76 and Morph 3
DJR Posted June 13 Posted June 13 54 minutes ago, Morph said: So true and pertinent to our ZA of today.
Bonus Posted June 17 Posted June 17 My brother in law, who visited us last week with his wife and who’s currently in Ireland visiting his daughter ….. has just heard that his fav pub in Jo’burg is on fire!
justinafrika Posted June 19 Posted June 19 (edited) 19 minutes ago, Hairy said: oNLy 91 more felony criminal charges to go... Edited June 19 by justinafrika
IceCreamMan Posted June 25 Posted June 25 (edited) Well well well. Follow the science they said…seems the science was flawed in some regards. https://kansasreflector.com/2024/06/17/kansas-ag-kobach-accuses-pfizer-of-misleading-vaccine-marketing-in-lawsuit/ Edited June 25 by IceCreamMan
DJR Posted June 26 Posted June 26 14 hours ago, IceCreamMan said: Well well well. Follow the science they said…seems the science was flawed in some regards. https://kansasreflector.com/2024/06/17/kansas-ag-kobach-accuses-pfizer-of-misleading-vaccine-marketing-in-lawsuit/ "Science" is often flawed, no doubt. But at least it is open to examination, re-evaluation and correction, as history has proved many times over. But what else should we "follow" as an alternative when it comes to health matters? Folklore? Superstition? Anecdotal stories? Beliefs? Trump? These are not based on something that allows examination, re-evaluation and correction. All alternatives are even more fallible, methinks. justinafrika 1
IceCreamMan Posted June 26 Posted June 26 13 minutes ago, DJR said: "Science" is often flawed, no doubt. But at least it is open to examination, re-evaluation and correction, as history has proved many times over. But what else should we "follow" as an alternative when it comes to health matters? Folklore? Superstition? Anecdotal stories? Beliefs? Trump? These are not based on something that allows examination, re-evaluation and correction. All alternatives are even more fallible, methinks. Those affected will find little comfort in this though. politicians, scientists and the worlds Karen’s were using the refrain “ follow the science” and yet it appears the trials etc were not correctly or completely performed. There is a lawsuit going on here under the CPA with folks who have had seriously negative affects from the vaccine. governments, employers the world over mandated these in a draconian over reach and should be held liable. But alas, we know that’s unlikely. big pharma is in trouble if even one of these cases succeeds.
patham Posted June 26 Posted June 26 24 minutes ago, IceCreamMan said: Those affected will find little comfort in this though. politicians, scientists and the worlds Karen’s were using the refrain “ follow the science” and yet it appears the trials etc were not correctly or completely performed. There is a lawsuit going on here under the CPA with folks who have had seriously negative affects from the vaccine. governments, employers the world over mandated these in a draconian over reach and should be held liable. But alas, we know that’s unlikely. big pharma is in trouble if even one of these cases succeeds. All I know is that you are going to get the last of the OG threads closed at this rate…. IceCreamMan and Meezo 2
Hairy Posted June 26 Posted June 26 Let's get this thread back on track justinafrika, Dusty, Meezo and 1 other 4
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now