Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 286
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

You would have thought the magistrate would have inspected it by now, before trying to prosecute a case here he needs to proof the driver of Taxi was negligent.

 

G

Posted

You would have thought the magistrate would have inspected it by now, before trying to prosecute a case here he needs to proof the driver of Taxi was negligent.

 

G

 

If the case hasn't been before him, he has no reason to inspect the site. Unreasonable to expect otherwise. Magistrates don't prosecute; they hear matters.

Posted

Sorry true, missed the fact that it was the magistrate that was going to inspect the site, my brain read, advocate/lawyer/council,

 

excuse me, no coffee yet.

 

G

 

If the case hasn't been before him, he has no reason to inspect the site. Unreasonable to expect otherwise. Magistrates don't prosecute; they hear matters.

Posted

Just read an unedited and unpublished version of yesterday's proceedings. Apparently it was raised in court that you can only cross a solid line when turning into a residential property. Is that true?

Posted

Just read an unedited and unpublished version of yesterday's proceedings. Apparently it was raised in court that you can only cross a solid line when turning into a residential property. Is that true?

 

If I remember correctly it is true. At intersections the line will be broken that would normally allow you to turn into another street.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout