WTF CSA?

[jcza]

International Best Standards for non-profit organisations......they're having a laugh? Auditors unable to conclude that all income was accounted for. 

[Bateleur1]

Check what you say on this topic. People are edgy

 

I find paragraph 3.2 very entertaining.  Did this thread not start about insurances not getting paid?

[scotty]

I'm no lawyer, but looks to me he is asking questions rather than allegations.  

 

@Cycling_SA And while we're busy check if someone at CSA gets a kickback on a membership app that i [sic] cannot find the approval of in minutes of meetings

 

@Cycling_SA I would like that authories [sic] investigate the link between KZN/Pietermaritzburg money for events and csa and their organisers

 

Better get all those licences asap as there won't be staff in the @Cycling_SA office by the time our 4 riders finish in Paris

[bikebloke]

stupid people steal with a gun

smart people steal with a lawyer

 

 

note: I didn't actually say this im just repeating a statement from an anonymous source

[Shebeen]

@Grootlem is up 5 more followers already!

[Shebeen]

but no complaints about this tweet?

 

[Gen]

How long has Bradley been in charge of CSA?

 

Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk

[Hairy]

stupid people steal with a gun

smart people steal with a lawyer

 

 

note: I didn't actually say this im just repeating a statement from an anonymous source

anonymous source .... must be false news then

 

@Grootlem is up 5 more followers already!

+ 1 more!

[Bateleur1]

anonymous source .... must be false news then

 

Create a fake twitter account then it is not anonymous anymore 

[Bateleur1]

I can't help to wonder about Grootlems little love letter.  Who paid for it?  Did Bradley pay from his pocket or did this also come out of the CSA budget?

[Gen]

I can't help to wonder about Grootlems little love letter. Who paid for it? Did Bradley pay from his pocket or did this also come out of the CSA budget?

Well he gets a salary from CSA..so either way membership fees have funded it.

 

 

 

Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk

[Gen]

Found this little article. . Dated 16/12/2013

 

https://cyclingdirect.co.za/cycling-south-africa-credit-due

 

there is a link to the report in that article..

 

 

 

 

 

Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk

[Patchelicious]

How long has Bradley been in charge of CSA?

 

Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk

Too long it seems

[Hairy]

I can't help to wonder about Grootlems little love letter.  Who paid for it?  Did Bradley pay from his pocket or did this also come out of the CSA budget?

Copy and paste from the letter:

 

1. We act as legal consultants to Mike Bradley ("our client").

So then I would assume he is the person paying for it, being the Client

 

4. The offending content is defamatory and was published with the intention of defaming our client and causing harm to our client’s reputation. We are instructed that you have published the offending content negligently and/or recklessly and/or maliciously and with knowledge that the offending content is defamatory. Our client has suffered and continues to suffer material harm to his constitutional rights to reputation and dignity as a result of the publication of the offending content. 5. Moreover, the offending content amounts to harassment of our client in terms of the Protection from Harassment Act 17 of 2011, in that it amounts to unreasonable engagement in electronic communications aimed at our client that you know or ought to know, cause harm or that inspire the reasonable belief that harm may be caused. 6. In an addition to a claim for general damages, if our client suffers any financial loss or loss of profits as a result of the offending content, our client will have a claim for special damages (i.e. any financial loss he may suffer as a result of the allegations made in the offending content).

 

From this is seems that if their Client (Mr Bradley) suffer financially they will come after Die Grootste Lem in Die Land to get some cash back....and that their Client is getting bad street cred.

 

So all this focuses on the impact of the tweets on their Client only, so I would assume the legal fee is being picked up by their Client and not CSA? They have never stated CSA as being their Client....or did I miss something?

[Pulse]

Old, but interesting in retrospect. Even though the answers given is a bit ...

 

http://www.treadmtb.co.za/beer-with-mike-bradley-general-manager-csa/

[Bateleur1]

Copy and paste from the letter:

 

1. We act as legal consultants to Mike Bradley ("our client").

So then I would assume he is the person paying for it, being the Client

 

4. The offending content is defamatory and was published with the intention of defaming our client and causing harm to our client’s reputation. We are instructed that you have published the offending content negligently and/or recklessly and/or maliciously and with knowledge that the offending content is defamatory. Our client has suffered and continues to suffer material harm to his constitutional rights to reputation and dignity as a result of the publication of the offending content. 5. Moreover, the offending content amounts to harassment of our client in terms of the Protection from Harassment Act 17 of 2011, in that it amounts to unreasonable engagement in electronic communications aimed at our client that you know or ought to know, cause harm or that inspire the reasonable belief that harm may be caused. 6. In an addition to a claim for general damages, if our client suffers any financial loss or loss of profits as a result of the offending content, our client will have a claim for special damages (i.e. any financial loss he may suffer as a result of the allegations made in the offending content).

 

From this is seems that if their Client (Mr Bradley) suffer financially they will come after Die Grootste Lem in Die Land to get some cash back....and that their Client is getting bad street cred.

 

So all this focuses on the impact of the tweets on their Client only, so I would assume the legal fee is being picked up by their Client and not CSA? They have never stated CSA as being their Client....or did I miss something?

 

Wonder how they will prove that GrootLems comments has caused their client financial losses.

 

Yes their client is Mr Bradley, but as Numba 1 of CSA it would not surprise me if CSA migth get the bill for this.