Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

 

After watching the video that someone posted on here explaining the history of Boeing, it seems that while they were pretty much the only big player in town, they did things properly, but as soon as they had to "compete" they started to cut corners left, right and center. 

 

Like with any process,once you start down that path you are always going to have it revisit you.

  • Replies 4.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

After watching the video that someone posted on here explaining the history of Boeing, it seems that while they were pretty much the only big player in town, they did things properly, but as soon as they had to "compete" they started to cut corners left, right and center. 

 

Like with any process,once you start down that path you are always going to have it revisit you.

 

Cutting corners happens with software development as well. A project deadline approaches and hacks are made to get it out on time. More often than not those hacks are never redone properly because there is always something else that needs to be done.

 

Boeing is going to need to revise their whole process.

Posted (edited)

After watching the video that someone posted on here explaining the history of Boeing, it seems that while they were pretty much the only big player in town, they did things properly, but as soon as they had to "compete" they started to cut corners left, right and center.

 

 

Ironically, it was the other way round.

 

When Boeing had competition in the form of McDonnal-Douglas they built great planes. Boeing then bought M-D as the latter had big defence contracts and in a twist of corporate fate, the M-D executives started running the enlarged business - no longer as the Boeing engineers did, but as the Wall street MBA equipped accountants they were.

 

Shareholder returns became the driving force rather than engineering excellence..

 

 

 

.

Edited by eddy
Posted

Cutting corners happens with software development as well. A project deadline approaches and hacks are made to get it out on time. More often than not those hacks are never redone properly because there is always something else that needs to be done.

 

Boeing is going to need to revise their whole process.

 

THIS ^^^  :cursing:   aaaarrrrrgghhhhh

Posted (edited)

The airline also gave new instructions to its baggage-handling company about how the cargo doors should be closed and about ensuring cargo nets in the hold were correctly fitted and secured.

 

Part of the technicians final walk around includes checking all doors are closed properly. 

Edited by Long Wheel Base
Posted

As a result of the incident, FlySafair inspected cargo door pressure seals on all its aircraft, implemented a system of daily and weekly inspections, and decided to replace the seals regularly.

 

So they were not already doing this??? We do a general visual inspection after every flight and a detailed visual inspection at every weekly check on these door seals.

Posted

FOD inside fuel tanks...Not uncommon

 

I would love to know what they found, if it was some significant or relatively minor.

Posted

FOD inside fuel tanks...Not uncommon

 

I would love to know what they found, if it was some significant or relatively minor.

 

 

Foreign Object Debris can generally include rags, tools and spare parts apparently! 

Posted

Foreign Object Debris can generally include rags, tools and spare parts apparently! 

Yeah anything Foreign. But like Swiss said, fuel tanks can accumulate dirt etc from the bowser/tanks it gets kept in prior to being pumped into the aircraft. There are filters that sort that out BUT a rag is a serious problem, or swarf from drilling. Even silicone that covers the grommets or electrical plugs is not too serious but they serious part about that is what is exposed or what was the silicone protecting. We do a regulatory course on Fuel Tank Safety, it covers all this sort of thing.

Posted (edited)

Yeah anything Foreign. But like Swiss said, fuel tanks can accumulate dirt etc from the bowser/tanks it gets kept in prior to being pumped into the aircraft. There are filters that sort that out BUT a rag is a serious problem, or swarf from drilling. Even silicone that covers the grommets or electrical plugs is not too serious but they serious part about that is what is exposed or what was the silicone protecting. We do a regulatory course on Fuel Tank Safety, it covers all this sort of thing.

On the 737 how big are the tanks, are they big enough for someone to get in?

 

I have on occasion found things like screw drivers in fuel tanks but that’s on small pisscats that I worked on where you can only put your arm inside.... so it’s easy to forget something and not notice it (took check jaaaa... i know), so i can imagine in those big tanks the potential to leave something more interesting ( large ) inside

Edited by SwissVan
Posted

On the 737 how big are the tanks, are they big enough for someone to get in?

 

I have on occasion found things like screw drivers in fuel tanks but that’s on small pisscats that I worked on where you can only put your arm inside.... so it’s easy to forget something and not notice it (took check jaaaa... i know), so i can imagine in those big tanks the potential to leave something more interesting ( large ) inside

No not really big enough to get in. On B737 I have only worked on wing tanks and not the centre tank. I have worked on a B747 centre tank and that is massive, you can get in, walk around, stand up. The B737 wing tank you can basically climb in and lie down but your feet hang out. I have worked in a A340 wing tank and that is similar, climb in, lie down and you can get your feet in but luckily the work I had to do meant I went in waist height.

In my working on the line days, I fueled hundreds of B737-800. Will never forget the limits. Wing tanks take 3900 kg each and the centre tank takes 13 000 kg so a total of 20800kg. Only once did I get asked to fill it up to max and I got 20850kg in it. Flip I was so scared some fuel would spill out. Even as it taxiied off I was watching those fuel vents. Not that I could do much about it after push back.

Posted

I was looking for a picture of the Boeing 747 centre tank to show the size but couldn't find a decent one. Then you posted this.

 

Compared to the 737, the 747 has a swimming pool inside it.

 

Our house in SA had a small poos (roughly 3 x 7 meters) which held about 30 000 litres of water.  A 747 can take up to about 180 000 litres so that would be 6 times my pool so you might want to correct your statement that the 747 has a pretty large swimming pool in it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout