Jump to content

How to resist 26" deals?


martinza

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've thought of replacing the Yeti with a newer shorter travel bike, but then I ride a cool flowing trail with some rocks and remember why I bought it in the first place. I've got a 29" hard tail and it suits me for the more gravel rides, so why replace

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Me not enjoying my recent 26" DH build:

 

 

 

20200803_153510.jpg

You look to be rolling so slow....i mean i could see in that video how your front wheel got hung up on those gravel stones. And the geometry...hell, you must hurt so much riding in that uncomfortable position. Also, assuming that is a wooden frame? Surely alloy didn't exist in 26” days? And how did you manage to get down the hill on those Makro tires? I like how you used a marker to draw in the maxxis logos for effect ☺️
Posted

No man

 

Only tires will potentially become an issue down the line and then it's easy to import. Also Chaoyang have rad options.

 

Kids bikes will always exist, Vee tire co will continue to make awesome 26 tires.

 

Dirt jump bikes will always exist..... 

 

It's a hugely over rated 'issue' to be honest.

This was my only recent "issue" was the 26" tires and i ended up getting a set of Chaoyang Hornets and they are flippen awesome!!!!!!!!

 

Also as mentioned anything can be imported if 26" is the ride of your choice as is with me, a 29" is just too much for my short legs, i did everything the "Downhillers" did this weekend on my 26" and im sure i got more air hahahahahahaha

Posted

You look to be rolling so slow....i mean i could see in that video how your front wheel got hung up on those gravel stones. And the geometry...hell, you must hurt so much riding in that uncomfortable position. Also, assuming that is a wooden frame? Surely alloy didn't exist in 26” days? And how did you manage to get down the hill on those Makro tires? I like how you used a marker to draw in the maxxis logos for effect ☺️

Spot on, Rushdee does ride like a girl

Posted

my take...

 

MTB geometry is still a developing "science"...  a relatively average modern MTB will run circles around a top-of-the-range model from 10 years ago.

 

So a 26" full-sus XC bike from 2010 won't be nearly as fun to ride as a similar bike from 2018 and it's not because of wheel size, but just general geometry.

 

My solution to riding a fun yet affordable bike, is to buy a ~130mm enduro bike from ~3 years ago.  These are capable enough for the rough stuff and if you're not racing, you can comfortably ride anything else on it too.

Posted

The biggest issue for me is that most 26ers have pretty outdated geo, but that also depends on what kind of riding you do.

 

I took my 26" Ti Ragley hardtail and stuck a pair of American Classic 650B wheels on it. Tight fit, but I don't think I'll ever let it go. Bike is light and rides like a dream. The bike now has tyres you can't find, hubs you can't get spares for, an irreplaceable fork, a dying BB standard.. I guess it is not going to cost me much going forward :-D

Posted

I took my 26" Ti Ragley hardtail and stuck a pair of American Classic 650B wheels on it. Tight fit, but I don't think I'll ever let it go. Bike is light and rides like a dream. The bike now has tyres you can't find, hubs you can't get spares for, an irreplaceable fork, a dying BB standard.. I guess it is not going to cost me much going forward :-D

 

Yeah, I generalized based on XC type bikes. There were some very nice ones though that are still fun to ride now.

 

Bikes have changed and improved a lot over the last 10 years though.

Posted

my take...

 

MTB geometry is still a developing "science"...  a relatively average modern MTB will run circles around a top-of-the-range model from 10 years ago.

 

So a 26" full-sus XC bike from 2010 won't be nearly as fun to ride as a similar bike from 2018 and it's not because of wheel size, but just general geometry.

 

My solution to riding a fun yet affordable bike, is to buy a ~130mm enduro bike from ~3 years ago.  These are capable enough for the rough stuff and if you're not racing, you can comfortably ride anything else on it too.

 

 

Your post had me wondering ... even slightly worried .....

 

 

We spent a good bit of cash re-doing a 10 year old Mongoose ..... Maritz needs 2cm more inseam, then he can shred this beauty.

 

 

But after your post I wondered about the geometry ....

 

 

I measured up the following:

- 10 year old Mongoose, 26''

- 4 year old Merida, 17,5''

- last years Titan, 26'' (which Maritz is currently riding, very happily with no issues)

 

Turns out the "new" Titan has more AGRESSIVE geometry than the Mongoose.  :eek:   Fork 1-degree more upright, distance between front and rear axles 15mm shorter on the Titan (okay, that it probably just the difference between the XS and the M frames).  The Merida fork angle came in smack bang in the middle of these two.

 

Punch line, when he gets onto the "old bike" in a few months he is getting better geometry ..... uhm, ja .... guess that in itself is a whole different topic ..... "aggresive" vs "long and slack" geometry ....  

 

 

PUNCH LINE ....from this small sample of bikes 10 years of "progress" has not resulted in "massive changes" in these bikes.

 

 

PS - I do prefer a bike with a slacker angle than these three bikes ..... The Merida is my commuter, and I am always amazed at the quick reactions to steering input, as compared to my MTB with a 4 degrees more on the fork angle .....  So did the designs change so much over the years, OR is it a matter of having so many more options now ?

Posted

Your post had me wondering ... even slightly worried .....

 

 

We spent a good bit of cash re-doing a 10 year old Mongoose ..... Maritz needs 2cm more inseam, then he can shred this beauty.

 

 

But after your post I wondered about the geometry ....

 

 

I measured up the following:

- 10 year old Mongoose, 26''

- 4 year old Merida, 17,5''

- last years Titan, 26'' (which Maritz is currently riding, very happily with no issues)

 

Turns out the "new" Titan has more AGRESSIVE geometry than the Mongoose.  :eek:   Fork 1-degree more upright, distance between front and rear axles 15mm shorter on the Titan (okay, that it probably just the difference between the XS and the M frames).  The Merida fork angle came in smack bang in the middle of these two.

 

Punch line, when he gets onto the "old bike" in a few months he is getting better geometry ..... uhm, ja .... guess that in itself is a whole different topic ..... "aggresive" vs "long and slack" geometry ....  

 

 

PUNCH LINE ....from this small sample of bikes 10 years of "progress" has not resulted in "massive changes" in these bikes.

 

 

PS - I do prefer a bike with a slacker angle than these three bikes ..... The Merida is my commuter, and I am always amazed at the quick reactions to steering input, as compared to my MTB with a 4 degrees more on the fork angle .....  So did the designs change so much over the years, OR is it a matter of having so many more options now ?

 

I'm not sure what the old Mongoose is but I as far as I know, the new Titans are very much "XC racing" oriented and as such, still have very steep head tube angles.

 

And I don't think that the "progress" in geometry can be compared across bike types. E.g. an XC bike today will very likely have a steeper head tube angle than any Enduro style bike from 10 years ago even though it may well be slacker than XC bikes from the same era.

Posted

BMXER,

Just finished the 36ONE Half(180km) on this circus bike. Not bad for a clown on a 26" HT with rigid fork hey :eek:

Keep it real I'd say

post-15997-0-99989300-1605869406_thumb.jpg

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout