Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Shebeen said:

I was going to do EA stanford on my gravelbike in feb last year to prove your exact point, There was a sandy section for 4km otherwise the rest was hardpack gravel. Would have been a winner.

I seriously considered putting 40mm tyres onto my hardtail for ARWC. However, after doing the course I am glad I took my hardtail with 2.25 tyres, this is a teamsport afterall so the gain is only really there if you do it together. 

Zuurberg pass with no suspension, that baviaanskloof 4x4 track, the final muddy stuff in the forestry roads??? norrafok, it was definitely the gnarliest terrain he ever put on. 

 

 

100%, you need all 4 on gravel and you need to cherry pick the event, but I think for a 120 you will easy get away with it

  • Replies 122
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, Bub Marley said:

Im curious as to how much difference chunky tyres would make compared to skinnier gravel ones on district roads?

 

Dylan Johnson (owner of the dropbar bike pictured) would argue wider is always better, unless you need to clear mud. 

https://www.instagram.com/dylanjawnson/p/C2dIgQcOa0w/?img_index=1

Bigger tyres = lower pressures = lower rolling resistance

 

 

Edited by MongooseMan
Posted
19 minutes ago, MongooseMan said:

Dylan Johnson (owner of the dropbar bike pictured) would argue wider is always better, unless you need to clear mud. 

https://www.instagram.com/dylanjawnson/p/C2dIgQcOa0w/?img_index=1

Bigger tyres = lower pressures = lower rolling resistance

 

 

Yeah but this is excluding the aerodynamic penalty. Common sense tells me a narrower 42mm tyre will be faster on a flat district road than a 2.2” mtb tyre? Maybe my way of thinking is still old school.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Bub Marley said:

Yeah but this is excluding the aerodynamic penalty. Common sense tells me a narrower 42mm tyre will be faster on a flat district road than a 2.2” mtb tyre? Maybe my way of thinking is still old school.

A few points:
- Aero vs rolling resistance is a tricky one, esp since aero is very personalized (and often non-intuitive)

- Wider tyres would likely also have more puncture protection, so even if it costs you a nett 2W in aero, you'd save hugely on any flat repairs

- Wider tyres at lower pressures are more comfortable, which in the long run with allow you to be faster.

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, MongooseMan said:

A few points:
- Aero vs rolling resistance is a tricky one, esp since aero is very personalized (and often non-intuitive)

- Wider tyres would likely also have more puncture protection, so even if it costs you a nett 2W in aero, you'd save hugely on any flat repairs

- Wider tyres at lower pressures are more comfortable, which in the long run with allow you to be faster.

 

So ideally we need gravel bikes with enough clearance for mtb tyres. Basically like his Felt bike he’s riding this year.

Posted
Just now, Bub Marley said:

So ideally we need gravel bikes with enough clearance for mtb tyres. Basically like his Felt bike he’s riding this year.

That would be his fundamental argument, yes :) 

Posted
Just now, MongooseMan said:

That would be his fundamental argument, yes :) 

At least that tells me now to get a gravel bike which the biggest clearance when i do decide to get one. Was also thinking maybe convert the hardtail, put a rigid fork in with drop bars but then you still have the gearing issue.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Bub Marley said:

At least that tells me now to get a gravel bike which the biggest clearance when i do decide to get one. Was also thinking maybe convert the hardtail, put a rigid fork in with drop bars but then you still have the gearing issue.

Ticks the boxes

IMG_6177.jpeg.79eecec31897ff7ad94543919286bf04.jpeg

Posted (edited)

My 2024 Crux came with Shimano GRX 820 12-speed mechanical which ive spent some time with.

Ive now changed the front chainring to 42t and the rear cassette to a 10-51t which gives me a nice pedalling range from 0.82 -> 4.2 (originally came with 40t and 10-45t cassette 0.89 -> 4.0).

For those wanting a poor mans mechanical mullet, its hard to beat Shimano durability and value, but can honestly say that the smoothness of my 1x11 SRAM Force is missed.

FWIW im using a "goatlink" to allow my medium cage derailleur to absorb the larger cassette.

Also im not crazy about the chain-line on a non-boost setup. There is a heap of resistance with the chain this far over .

IMG_4744.jpeg

IMG_4742.jpeg

 

Edited by Kom
Posted

My Niner still feel too much like a mtb (and it does not look so lekker) compared to my Ritchey SwissCross, so i will be converting it back to mtb later which was awesome…

IMG_5854.jpeg

IMG_5855.jpeg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout