Danger Dassie Posted May 26, 2010 Posted May 26, 2010 Andrew on one of his missions to destroy another succesful club/team as it is hindering his sponsorhip deals' date=' so he has to divert attention from himself.[/quote'] Whilst you've made that accusation anonymously, lets wait a while eh.
Nettie R Posted May 26, 2010 Posted May 26, 2010 Andrew on one of his missions to destroy another succesful club/team as it is hindering his sponsorhip deals' date=' so he has to divert attention from himself.[/quote'] Please back up your accusation with facts. Your unnecessary mud slinging is in poor taste.
techguy Posted May 26, 2010 Posted May 26, 2010 If you really wanna shake a tree the a chainsaw works. when the tree hits the ground it shakes a lot.
BrendonMyb Posted May 26, 2010 Posted May 26, 2010 Andrew on one of his missions to destroy another succesful club/team as it is hindering his sponsorhip deals' date=' so he has to divert attention from himself.[/quote'] be careful with what youre saying here, you could end up with a wrap on the knuckles. Unless you have your facts & all your ducks in a row, Andrew has been known to read posts on the hub & will or rather possibly take it further with you legally. I reckon it could become quite unpleasant for youBumpNgrind2010-05-26 03:16:31
techguy Posted May 26, 2010 Posted May 26, 2010 OOOOh anyone for popcorn? hows this for a switchback? More facts thanks Bushie...
mikkelz Posted May 26, 2010 Posted May 26, 2010 Andrew on one of his missions to destroy another succesful club/team as it is hindering his sponsorhip deals' date=' so he has to divert attention from himself.[/quote'] ? be careful with what youre saying here, you could end up with a wrap on the knuckles. Unless you have?your facts & all your ducks in a row, Andrew has been known to?read posts on the hub?& will or rather possibly?take it further with you legally. I reckon it could become quite unpleasant for you
mark ellis Posted June 15, 2010 Posted June 15, 2010 dam, we need a good conspiracy to make things interesting on here again
avatar Posted June 15, 2010 Posted June 15, 2010 Seems like you were all barking up the wrong tree...
IdeJongh Posted June 15, 2010 Posted June 15, 2010 Think Mclean was just trying to branch out his business.
mikkelz Posted June 15, 2010 Posted June 15, 2010 Still waiting... Oh wait, I unfollowed him due to boredom from waiting.
Gatiepie Posted June 28, 2010 Posted June 28, 2010 Maybe it's because of the Competition Commission's findings?
Edge_Design Posted July 6, 2010 Posted July 6, 2010 Sorry to drag this thread out again, but did Andrew ever manage to shake his tree??? I can't believe he said that relating to his own little foray into the more exotic pricing strategies?! If it was relating to stolen bikes, I would be very interested to hear what happened! Wish I had the time to do a bit of digging in Cape Town myself as I have come across at least 2, possibly 3 people through the hub alone that I know for a fact deal in stolen bikes/parts.
covie Posted July 7, 2010 Posted July 7, 2010 I beleive its part of the competition commision findings, but was'nt his company one of the transgressors?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now