Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

ridden both?

Both have motors, ergo, motorbikes.  The source of the fuel, electric or petrol is irrelevant.  As soon as there is a degree of energy capture, storage and then motorisation, it is no longer a bicycle.

The thing that makes bicycling the way it is is the directness of human effort to propulsion, having a battery/ fuel tank to store energy and a motor to supplement direct human effort makes it a different game altogether.

Posted

Nice e-bike, when do we see it on the trails?

 

We won't - it was from 2013/2014 if memory serves. A failed experiment that nearly sank Cannondale. It was a miserable failure from start to finish and cost 'dale around $20,000,000!

Posted

Both have motors, ergo, motorbikes.  The source of the fuel, electric or petrol is irrelevant.  As soon as there is a degree of energy capture, storage and then motorisation, it is no longer a bicycle.

The thing that makes bicycling the way it is is the directness of human effort to propulsion, having a battery/ fuel tank to store energy and a motor to supplement direct human effort makes it a different game altogether.

 

This has been discussed plenty - I agree with you.

 

Me feeling is that e-bike was coined by manufacturers to "fool" people into thinking of them as "enhanced bicycles" rather than motorbikes.

Posted

Both have motors, ergo, motorbikes.  The source of the fuel, electric or petrol is irrelevant.  As soon as there is a degree of energy capture, storage and then motorisation, it is no longer a bicycle.

The thing that makes bicycling the way it is is the directness of human effort to propulsion, having a battery/ fuel tank to store energy and a motor to supplement direct human effort makes it a different game altogether.

doesn't answer my question.

Anyway...

Your opinion (and that of the 2 posts above) and you're entitled to it.

 

 

 

But..... 

They're super ..SUPER... fun.

I get an incredible workout on mine,that I'm fortunate AF to have.

 

You should really just try one one day...

Posted

doesn't answer my question.

Anyway...

Your opinion (and that of the 2 posts above) and you're entitled to it.

 

 

 

But.....

They're super ..SUPER... fun.

I get an incredible workout on mine,that I'm fortunate AF to have.

 

You should really just try one one day...

Of course it's fun - you can go twice as fast for the same effort!

 

I think general consensus and logic have won this debate - cool to use them on the trails or wherever you like - not cool to use them in races.

Posted

Both have motors, ergo, motorbikes. The source of the fuel, electric or petrol is irrelevant. As soon as there is a degree of energy capture, storage and then motorisation, it is no longer a bicycle.

The thing that makes bicycling the way it is is the directness of human effort to propulsion, having a battery/ fuel tank to store energy and a motor to supplement direct human effort makes it a different game altogether.

I think this thread should be locked for further comments. Can't imagine anyone can say anything that hasn't already been said/discussed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout