Vetplant Posted July 2, 2018 Posted July 2, 2018 Guess we can close the thread now Agreed, we can revive it when someone appeals or somehow this case gets a second life, but for now we can focus on LE Tour!
Prince Posted July 2, 2018 Posted July 2, 2018 I see there was no reason given for the decison except "unparalleled access to information"?
geomark Posted July 2, 2018 Posted July 2, 2018 Wonder if Ulisse will have a case to have his suspension then removed from his name? Sent from my SM-G950F using TapatalkIf they have shown that the test are ineffective at linking intake vs levels in urine then there is definitely going to be blowback
Thor Buttox Posted July 2, 2018 Posted July 2, 2018 Hope the ASOles are happy with the clearance. And I hope Chris tells Hinauld to roger himself roughly. And I hope the UCI realises the mess their system creates. And even though I support Chris I am not convinced he is innocent. What a mess.
Gen Posted July 2, 2018 Posted July 2, 2018 Agreed, we can revive it when someone appeals or somehow this case gets a second life, but for now we can focus on LE Tour!This case can't get a second life WADA were involved...and it was WADA who cleared him.. actually well played by the UCI..because now there can't be appeals to CAS... had the decision gone the other why then possibly Froome would've gone to the CAS but would've lost. Rider who have received bans for the same substance readings could however have a case to have their names cleares. Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
Gen Posted July 2, 2018 Posted July 2, 2018 Hope the ASOles are happy with the clearance. And I hope Chris tells Hinauld to roger himself roughly. And I hope the UCI realises the mess their system creates. And even though I support Chris I am not convinced he is innocent. What a mess.I was actually not their mess hey.. WADA set out the guidelines that they have to follow... hopefully WADA make some changes to their guidelines... Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
lechatnoir Posted July 2, 2018 Posted July 2, 2018 Look I am no Froome fan..but thank goodness it is over with now... no more awkward press interviews for riders who have nothing to do with it.. and it can be about the racing now.. Scenario 3 it is.. urine stockpile getting cleared as we speak. Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk I hope so, but some fans are too fantatical... Wonder if Ulisse will have a case to have his suspension then removed from his name? Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk All riders are equal, but some riders are more equal than others... in short, no
Thor Buttox Posted July 2, 2018 Posted July 2, 2018 I was actually not their mess hey.. WADA set out the guidelines that they have to follow... hopefully WADA make some changes to their guidelines... Sent from my SM-G950F using TapatalkGuidelines are for kites not international sport, me thinks.
Gen Posted July 2, 2018 Posted July 2, 2018 I hope so, but some fans are too fantatical... All riders are equal, but some riders are more equal than others... in short, noIt would be wrong.. Petacchi and Ulisse would have a very strong case against their suspension ... a whole new can of worms has jus been opened..they could go after income lost as well.[emoji102] Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
Patchelicious Posted July 2, 2018 Posted July 2, 2018 It would be wrong.. Petacchi and Ulisse would have a very strong case against their suspension ... a whole new can of worms has jus been opened..they could go after income lost as well.[emoji102] Sent from my SM-G950F using TapatalkDid they supply the same data that Froome did?
ScottCM Posted July 2, 2018 Posted July 2, 2018 Wonder if Ulisse will have a case to have his suspension then removed from his name? Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk How would he go about that, he plead GUILTY, surely he can't go and say, well i only said i was guilty to get a lesser ban.
dave303e Posted July 2, 2018 Posted July 2, 2018 where are the cheapest inhalers for sale? *asking for a friend
Eldron Posted July 2, 2018 Posted July 2, 2018 It would be wrong.. Petacchi and Ulisse would have a very strong case against their suspension ... a whole new can of worms has jus been opened..they could go after income lost as well.[emoji102] Sent from my SM-G950F using TapatalkIf they had Sky resources I reckon they would have won as well. If the answer is in Froomes physiology then no go on Uli/Peta. If it's the test at fault I see a huge pile of smelly poo in WADA/UCI's future..
Gen Posted July 2, 2018 Posted July 2, 2018 Guidelines are for kites not international sport, me thinks.WADA - World Anti-Doping Agency.. they determine what is banned and what isn't in every sport and which guidlines to follow..true story..lots of articles on the UCi requesting certain substances to be banned and WADA stating nope not yet.. Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
ScottCM Posted July 2, 2018 Posted July 2, 2018 It would be wrong.. Petacchi and Ulisse would have a very strong case against their suspension ... a whole new can of worms has jus been opened..they could go after income lost as well.[emoji102] Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk How would he go about that, he plead GUILTY, surely he can't go and say, well i only said i was guilty to get a lesser ban.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.