Jump to content

Epic to Rescind Past Drug Rule?


Dubber

Recommended Posts

Dalian Wanda group... A chinese conglomerate that includes commercial real estate, Malls, fast food, theme parks, hotels etc owns Iron Man, which in turn owns Epic.

 

It is no longer an SA owned, SA run family business.

 

It is a commercial holding which either hits it's target numbers or gets shut down. In order to keep hitting those numbers, they will probably have to relook at including celebrities, past doper famous cycling faces and do away with moral stand points.

 

Chinese business is ruthless. 

 

I say as a cycling community guys need to move on from AWE factor of the Epic. The blinkers on, media hyped race everyone is so enamored with is really not so different to a host of other options we have on our doorstep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Life bans only applies to LA. Anyone else can get caught doping, serve a short sentence and come back and then we (some) cheer for them as well

What made LA different to most dopers was the scale of the operation and aspects surrounding it, ie intimidation, etc. The law in most countries makes a distinction between crime and organised crime, they made a similar distinction in LA's case. 

 

Doping in cycling has been around as long as the sport has been around. It is the organised variety that is doing such damage to the sport.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What made LA different to most dopers was the scale of the operation and aspects surrounding it, ie intimidation, etc. The law in most countries makes a distinction between crime and organised crime, they made a similar distinction in LA's case. 

 

Doping in cycling has been around as long as the sport has been around. It is the organised variety that is doing such damage to the sport.

3 words for you. Russians and Kazaks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I suspect they want to invite a few ex-pros to increase the publicity of the event.  And a lot of ex-pro's have a drug shadow hanging over them, which would have ruled them out from the event.

 

I can't imagine there are too many non pro's?  I'm sure there are a handful, but not really enough to impact the sales bank balance?  

 

It must be about high profile riders?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What made LA different to most dopers was the scale of the operation and aspects surrounding it, ie intimidation, etc. The law in most countries makes a distinction between crime and organised crime, they made a similar distinction in LA's case. 

 

Doping in cycling has been around as long as the sport has been around. It is the organised variety that is doing such damage to the sport.

 

 

3 words for you. Russians and Kazaks.

Yep - I'm with Patch on this one.  I think we would be naive to think Lance et al were the only ones with the elaborate setup.  I would imagine at least a couple other teams were there or there abouts... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 words for you. Russians and Kazaks.

Present some real evidence in a fair trial environment.

If they fail the test then ban them too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep - I'm with Patch on this one.  I think we would be naive to think Lance et al were the only ones with the elaborate setup.  I would imagine at least a couple other teams were there or there abouts... 

 

I think a lot of the teams and riders had the attitude - well if we don`t do it there is no way we will be competitive !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

That is a TV program, neither evidence nor a trial.

That is like saying it is true because you read it on the internet.

 

Like I said, present facts in a trial environment.

That is fair to everyone, otherwise we must as well just do away 

with legal systems around the world and replace them with kangaroo courts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is a TV program, neither evidence nor a trial.

That is like saying it is true because you read it on the internet.

 

Like I said, present facts in a trial environment.

That is fair to everyone, otherwise we must as well just do away 

with legal systems around the world and replace them with kangaroo courts.

Bahahhaha.

 

Dude, have you been living under a rock?

 

Have you even bothered to watch the "TV program" or read up on the court cases surrounding it?

Edited by Spinnekop
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is a TV program, neither evidence nor a trial.

That is like saying it is true because you read it on the internet.

 

Like I said, present facts in a trial environment.

That is fair to everyone, otherwise we must as well just do away 

with legal systems around the world and replace them with kangaroo courts.

So was Oprah.

Edited by Patchelicious
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it gets Luca to SA..I'm all good with it.[emoji6]

 

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bahahhaha.

 

Dude, have you been living under a rock?

 

Actually I have been following it VERY closely.

I believe everyone has the right to defend their case, so will wait till that happens and see

what evidence WADA can provide other than the emails. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So was Oprah.

Precisely!!!

Who cares what happened on Oprah, that was just a stupid publicity stunt for the masses.

 

He got banned by means of due process, only except that it should have happened earlier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout