Jump to content

Buying an expensive helmet (hopefully) should be a waste of money


Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, DieselnDust said:

I'm always a bit sceptical when I see this. Does the helmet carry the CE EN 1078 mark?

Can the manufacturer produce a certificate of conformity?

 

I remember a certain bicycle light vendor once claiming SABS accreditation but when I checked with SABS the product had never been tested because they lacked the ability to test...

We are the importer for Cairbull helmets, each model is tested and certified based on EN 1078 (for EU market) and CPSC 1203 (for US market). We are in possession of the test report and certificates.

These certificates are required for the helmets to be imported into those regions. We do however not have the same requirement in South Africa. 

The manufacturers design helmets mainly for EU and US markets so most helmets in the market will conform to the standards. 

Helmet manufacturing becomes more expensive due to tricky designs that would include more than one moulding process, higher rate of rejects etc. Safety very rarely plays a role (except with systems like MIPS which is expensive to licence - the actual system is extremely cheap). 

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)
19 hours ago, RookieSports.co.za said:

We are the importer for Cairbull helmets, each model is tested and certified based on EN 1078 (for EU market) and CPSC 1203 (for US market). We are in possession of the test report and certificates.

These certificates are required for the helmets to be imported into those regions. We do however not have the same requirement in South Africa. 

The manufacturers design helmets mainly for EU and US markets so most helmets in the market will conform to the standards. 

Helmet manufacturing becomes more expensive due to tricky designs that would include more than one moulding process, higher rate of rejects etc. Safety very rarely plays a role (except with systems like MIPS which is expensive to licence - the actual system is extremely cheap). 

thanks for this insight. This is what I would expect of a serious manufacturer and distributor 👍🏼

Edited by DieselnDust
Posted
3 hours ago, RookieSports.co.za said:

We are the importer for Cairbull helmets, each model is tested and certified based on EN 1078 (for EU market) and CPSC 1203 (for US market). We are in possession of the test report and certificates.

These certificates are required for the helmets to be imported into those regions. We do however not have the same requirement in South Africa. 

The manufacturers design helmets mainly for EU and US markets so most helmets in the market will conform to the standards. 

Helmet manufacturing becomes more expensive due to tricky designs that would include more than one moulding process, higher rate of rejects etc. Safety very rarely plays a role (except with systems like MIPS which is expensive to licence - the actual system is extremely cheap). 

Ive actually had experience with accidents with both MIPS and non MIPS helmets. The non MIPS helmet was actually a cairbull brand I had. Got hit by a car and was left concussed on the side of the road. Had a slight bruise on my head but the helmet did it’s job. 
 

Also had an accident with an Oakley MIPS helmet. This was a much lighter crash but the helmet was destroyed again. My skull seem to have survived this crash also. 
 

Now I’m not really sure how much difference MIPS technology makes but I don’t think it’s the be all and end all if the Helmet doesn’t have it in. I also feel like of the technology made that much of a difference it would be in every helmet. 

Posted
7 hours ago, DieselnDust said:

Thanks to Headshot for posting that helmet review site. It is very insightful in terms of helmet performance. There are brands that stand out as consistent top performers and I was surprised to see Leatt not even feature in the top 100, just as I was surprised to see as many Giro helmets In the top 100 despite their very good cooling characteristics (Still 5 STAR rated too).…

I strongly suspect Leatt Corp /helmets were not TESTED for this report; maybe Paul M. of Leatt can comment?
 

Leatt is a SA Company that was then globalised (?), unsure of their HELMET Int’l presence; whereas their neck-brace international availability is well known…

Cheers

Chris

Posted
20 minutes ago, Bub Marley said:

Ive actually had experience with accidents with both MIPS and non MIPS helmets. The non MIPS helmet was actually a cairbull brand I had. Got hit by a car and was left concussed on the side of the road. Had a slight bruise on my head but the helmet did it’s job. 
 

Also had an accident with an Oakley MIPS helmet. This was a much lighter crash but the helmet was destroyed again. My skull seem to have survived this crash also. 
 

Now I’m not really sure how much difference MIPS technology makes but I don’t think it’s the be all and end all if the Helmet doesn’t have it in. I also feel like of the technology made that much of a difference it would be in every helmet. 

 

Each fall, or rather landing, is different ...

 

 

Mine was a high speed over the bars.  Less than half a rotation before the helmet hit the dirt .... MIPS activated and the helmet moved down like a visor ... 

 

Without MIPS that rotational movement would have been on my neck.

Posted
17 minutes ago, ChrisF said:

 

Each fall, or rather landing, is different ...

 

 

Mine was a high speed over the bars.  Less than half a rotation before the helmet hit the dirt .... MIPS activated and the helmet moved down like a visor ... 

 

Without MIPS that rotational movement would have been on my neck.

Agreed, 6 weeks ago i went bouncing across the tar and MIPS clutched it.

If it doesnt have MIPS you should be replacing in my view.

Posted

Picking up new helmet tomorrow! Sticking with specialised - did it's job 

What is never known is how much better / worse off you would have been given your helmet quality. Decent is paramount, the rest is probably not testable.

The one other thing I learnt after going through concussion testing, was that when your brain takes a knock - it needs good time to recover, slowly back to work, get neck muscles seen to as whip lash is real and don't get your head bumped any time soon again - the rugby players who get knocked week in week out get into huge trouble - so rest well till all head symptoms better before risking a second bump (free doctor advice!) 

Posted

Something to note that a lot of people dont know. Helmets expire, generally 3 - 5 years from production date. Im not 100% certain of the chemistry behind it but your chances of injury increase the older the helmet it due to age of the material.

Also something to bare in mind, if you drop your helmet, the point at which hit the ground becomes compromised and weakens the helmet quite substantially.

Another point, cost of a helmet shouldn't determine level of protection. Sure, some more expensive helmets have additional technologies such as MIPs. For instance a Scott Supra helmet, priced between R500 - R1000 depending where you shop, is great bang for buck but will also do a fantastic job protecting your noggin. Now im not saying go to Game and buy a Totem / Raleigh helmet for R100, obviously dont, but sticking to known brands will keep you safe.

Posted

I have a Lazer MTB helmet for sale (Shameless plug)
I think I wore it 5 times.
Lovely piece of kit.
Its a large, but still too small for my fat pip if I wear a sweat band. Its strange, as my Lazer road helmet fits fine.

Posted
4 hours ago, NotSoBigBen said:

The 'timers amongst us should remember the Bell ad from decades ago...

If you have a $10 head, wear a $10 helmet!

The woke among us will call that as elistist and demand an apology from Bell

Posted
14 hours ago, Zebra said:

I strongly suspect Leatt Corp /helmets were not TESTED for this report; maybe Paul M. of Leatt can comment?
 

Leatt is a SA Company that was then globalised (?), unsure of their HELMET Int’l presence; whereas their neck-brace international availability is well known…

Cheers

Chris

Dbx3.0 received a 4star rating and came in at 169th.it was the only Leatt that featured so I don’t know how the others would have faired

 

Posted
Just now, DieselnDust said:

Dbx3.0 received a 4star rating and came in at 169th.it was the only Leatt that featured so I don’t know how the others would have faired

 

Thanks, noted: I did voice-mail contact Paul M, of Leatt, to clarify, etc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout