Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 4/23/2024 at 7:43 AM, 100Tours said:

Yes, in theory. Aluminium has a finite number of fatigue cycles until it will break (unlike steel or carbon). I'm still riding a 20-year old aluminium cannondale however, and it hasn't shown signs of damage yet. Might happen during my lifetime, might not. I've seen fractured Titanium frames that are only a few years old, but not Aluminium.

Alu was the material of choice for h/bars, pedals, and so on for Paris Roubaix up until a few years ago because it is more forgiving than carbon (carbon will kill road buzz, but not corrugations), and it likely represents a lot better value as a gravel bike material at the moment. If you have 50k+ to spend then go Carbon, if you're in the 10-20k ballpark then Aluminium is a really good choice.

 

Everything has a finite number of fatigue cycles! 

  • Replies 144
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
12 hours ago, mecheng89 said:

Everything has a finite number of fatigue cycles! 

I'm not a mech eng, but there's this..

Fatigue life Nf is the number of stress cycles of a specified character that a structure sustains before failure occurs. For steel, there is a theoretical value for stress amplitude below which the material will not fail for any number of cycles. This value is called a fatigue limit or endurance limit.

 
  • 1 month later...
Posted
6 hours ago, rock said:

no one talking about this yet?

avalanche.JPG

it looks great, and i was a favourable voice for the Dust... but R31000 retail for specless wheels, tyres i've never heard of, a boat anchor prowheel crank with a stupid chainring size for the allround spec, and an l-twoo groupset that is great on paper, but has so many poor reviews between the RD and shifters. paying for the carbon frame, which i'd need to know more about, given its their first foray into carbon. I am all for the entry point Avalanches, but this is a bit dear.

i'd be snapping one up if it was around 20-22k, but not at over 30

Posted
7 hours ago, RossTopher said:

it looks great, and i was a favourable voice for the Dust... but R31000 retail for specless wheels, tyres i've never heard of, a boat anchor prowheel crank with a stupid chainring size for the allround spec, and an l-twoo groupset that is great on paper, but has so many poor reviews between the RD and shifters. paying for the carbon frame, which i'd need to know more about, given its their first foray into carbon. I am all for the entry point Avalanches, but this is a bit dear.

i'd be snapping one up if it was around 20-22k, but not at over 30

crazy price....the Titan Racing is so much more value for money...

Posted
27 minutes ago, guidodg said:

crazy price....the Titan Racing is so much more value for money...

100%. For 6k less, you can get the titan with microshift sword and better gear ratios

Still, the Merida silex 4000 is often on sale for 36-37. If you can afford 31, you can afford 37.

Posted
1 hour ago, RossTopher said:

If you can afford 31, you can afford 37.

This concept is one that has cost me a lot of money. You can start anywhere and with the same logic end up anywhere in 20% intervals.

9-11-13-15-18-22-26-31-37-44-54-65-78-94-next thing you know you bought a bicycle for R100k

Posted
11 hours ago, RossTopher said:

it looks great, and i was a favourable voice for the Dust... but R31000 retail for specless wheels, tyres i've never heard of, a boat anchor prowheel crank with a stupid chainring size for the allround spec, and an l-twoo groupset that is great on paper, but has so many poor reviews between the RD and shifters. paying for the carbon frame, which i'd need to know more about, given its their first foray into carbon. I am all for the entry point Avalanches, but this is a bit dear.

i'd be snapping one up if it was around 20-22k, but not at over 30

wonder much the RRP could drop if they ditched the carbon integrated stem/bar combo?

Posted
11 hours ago, RossTopher said:

it looks great, and i was a favourable voice for the Dust... but R31000 retail for specless wheels, tyres i've never heard of, a boat anchor prowheel crank with a stupid chainring size for the allround spec, and an l-twoo groupset that is great on paper, but has so many poor reviews between the RD and shifters. paying for the carbon frame, which i'd need to know more about, given its their first foray into carbon. I am all for the entry point Avalanches, but this is a bit dear.

i'd be snapping one up if it was around 20-22k, but not at over 30

https://www.avalanchebikes.co.za/products/avalanche-roam?color=thunder%20blue%2Fmatte%20black&size=m%2Fl

 

will wait for ride reports

 

Posted
2 hours ago, JayLow said:

This concept is one that has cost me a lot of money. You can start anywhere and with the same logic end up anywhere in 20% intervals.

9-11-13-15-18-22-26-31-37-44-54-65-78-94-next thing you know you bought a bicycle for R100k

No point buying one beer, so I'll get a sixer. Actually, while I'm here I may as well get a case.

(One thing led to another and now I own a bottle store)

Posted
3 hours ago, JayLow said:

This concept is one that has cost me a lot of money. You can start anywhere and with the same logic end up anywhere in 20% intervals.

9-11-13-15-18-22-26-31-37-44-54-65-78-94-next thing you know you bought a bicycle for R100k

This.! I was once told if you spending over ten grand you may as well spend twenty.. 

 

so 11/12 grand I may as well pay another 8 grand.? That’s rent for the month.! Well at the time it was🤣🤣.. or your car payment or groceries.. mental attitude.! 

Posted
1 hour ago, rock said:

wonder much the RRP could drop if they ditched the carbon integrated stem/bar combo?

on this very topic, I may buy a Gravel bike in the future, and will likely AVOID one with an integrated stem/bar combo, since for (frequent) travel, it is so much easier to remove regular bars, etc.

Posted
53 minutes ago, Zebra said:

on this very topic, I may buy a Gravel bike in the future, and will likely AVOID one with an integrated stem/bar combo, since for (frequent) travel, it is so much easier to remove regular bars, etc.

I would avoid internal routing through an integrated stem from the point of view of road side repairs.
It might look awesome (for racing), but its not practical (for touring).
But that's just me...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout