My colleague Srinath Sripath has the relevant new law for us: 19.4.2 The ball in play is to be regarded as being grounded beyond the boundary if - a fielder, grounded beyond the boundary as in 19.5, touches the ball; - a fielder, after catching the ball within the boundary, becomes grounded beyond the boundary while in contact with the ball, before completing the catch. Seems the third umpire got it right second time
16.5
1
Laughlin to Qais Ahmad, 1 run, full outside off, he drives to mid on
16.4
W
Laughlin to Rose, OUT, Caught and bowled! Super bowling and catching from Laughlin. Clever slower ball, he is deceived, he pops it back to the bowler, Laughlin was following through to his left, he had to stop and dive full length to his right and plucked it in the one hand
CA Rose c & b Laughlin 5 (5b 1x4 0x6) SR: 100.00
16.3
0
Laughlin to Rose, no run, full on off, he drives nicely straight to mid off
16.2
4
Laughlin to Rose, FOUR runs, short ball, clubbed over midwicket! Powerful shot
Matthew Wade on Channel 7: "I had no idea of the rule. The umpire's said he could do that so I knew it was out."
16.1
0
Laughlin to Rose, no run, good length outside off, he's back and chopping to point
END OF OVER:
16 | 3 Runs 1 Wkt | HH: 102/7 | RR: 6.37
Nathan Ellis0 (1b)
Clive Rose1 (1b)
Josh Lalor3-0-18-2
Ben Cutting1-0-6-1
peter: "Catch was not legal. Law 32 e:a fielder catches the ball in the air after it has crossed the boundary in the air, provided that after being struck by the bat, the first contact with the ball is by a fielder, not touching or grounded beyond the boundary, who has some part of his person grounded within the boundary or whose final contact with the ground before touching the ball was entirely within the boundary." There was a clause added Peter. I'm trying to find it
15.6
0
Lalor to Ellis, no run, slower ball, on off, he's back and pushing this to cover
Kalyanaraman : "@Alex, there was a similar catch by Smith in the IPL (Pune Warriors match), that was disallowed........... did the rule change by any chance?" I'm seeking clarification
15.5
1
Lalor to Rose, 1 run, full on middle, he defends to mid off, they take on the man and get a single
15.4
W
Lalor to Rogers, OUT, caught at mid off! Slower ball, back of a length, he backed away trying to go over mid off and miscued to Cutting on the circle
TS Rogers c Cutting b Lalor 17 (24b 0x4 0x6) SR: 70.83
15.3
0
Lalor to Rogers, no run, full on off, he drives firmly to cover
15.2
0
Lalor to Rogers, no run, short and wide, he backs away and misses
15.1
2
Lalor to Rogers, 2 runs, nearly a run out trying for two! Driven to long on, they run hard, the throw was awkward for Lalor to take
END OF OVER:
15 | 6 Runs 1 Wkt | HH: 99/6 | RR: 6.60
Thomas Rogers15 (20b)
Clive Rose0 (0b)
Ben Cutting1-0-6-1
Mitchell Swepson4-0-33-0
14.6
1
Cutting to Rogers, 1 run, full on leg, he drives to long on
BLOKE FROM THE : "Who made that ridiculous rule change should hang their head in shame. What a joke." For those unaware the rule has been changed. Previously that would have been six because he tapped it back without stepping back in but his feet were in the air when he tapped it
14.5
W
Cutting to Wade, OUT, Renshaw might have pulled off a ridiculous catch at long on with Banton in support! Wade went long and high over long on, Renshaw took the catch on the rope, he tossed it up as he stepped out, the ball was dropping over the rope, he jumped and batted it while he was in the air, and he knocked it to Banton who was there! Incredible thinking! But the third umpire says not out on broadcast but it hasn't been confirmed at the ground yet! There's a long delay. The third umpire wants another look. He does and he reverses the decision. Wade is out!
MS Wade c Banton b Cutting 61 (46b 3x4 2x6) SR: 132.60