Jump to content

Pappa Bear

Members
  • Posts

    896
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Pappa Bear

  1. Did I read ................S H U T T E L S!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
  2. Hope they got the wheelsize right..............
  3. We should get Derrick Watts to do a Carte Blanche on Carte te Blanche!
  4. Wanted to add that Krav Maga is a very effective defense style that has grown out of actual combat requirements and is probably one of the best defense styles out there. Just want people to realize that what is shown, takes lots of training.
  5. Rules for self defence: 1) Avoid dodgy areas 2) Avoid dodgy situations 3) Run / Escape should always be the first option 4) Submit if you can determine that you will not be harmed 5) Fight as the last option, and to be effective at defending yourself you need lots and lots of hours of training on a continuous bases to create confidence and effective "techniques". Point 5 is the one that most defence practisioners think they can master with a couple of lessons.......
  6. They do gratuitous shralpage because: 1) They get paid in one form or the other (Money, Image, Sponsors) 2) Because they can 3) Because they enjoy it I, and most other avergare riders, simply ride smoothly because: 1) I get "paid", in endorfins, smiles etc. 2) Because I can only ride "smooth" 3) Because I enjoy it Don't confuse the "movies" for real life...... my 2c
  7. I see Steve Peat has "revealed" his 2014 bike as a 26" V10......... was hoping for a 650b of the V10......
  8. Won't be supprised if Greg shows up with the new Nomad......its got a 65deg headangle, same as V10........
  9. Whos the chop who ordered 2 x cokes!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL
  10. Because it is one of the first things, like tires, sadles and grips that gets replaced. Each individual has his own preference.
  11. Just for interest sake.... Burry Stander started of as a DOWNHILLER and some guys a while back at Mankele couldn't keep up with him when he was on a 26" hardtail and they on 5" trail bikes going down the mountain. Answering your question OP, NO, a fire road warrior will never win the epic.
  12. Going to keep it for a while until I am sure the 66 is the right choice or don't have any further issues...
  13. Nomad redone in RAW ALU..... waiting on my Marzocchi 66!
  14. No secret.... we had a AGM and all with over 60 people.............. unless I am the last one on the hit list
  15. Hi Guys, So what is happening with the newly formed Tokai MTB club? Who has been allocated to which positions? Club fee? What do we get for joining the club - free entrance ? Some feedback woul be apprecaited! Cheers!
  16. So depending on what is left in the seedbanks......... they may endup with NOTHING like what they expect..... would be so funny if a bunch of pines took over
  17. Hi Guys, So what is happening with the Tokai MTB Club? Who has been allocated to certain positions? Club fee? What do we get in return for membership? - free enterance Some feedback would be appreciated! Cheers!
  18. I'm a MOTORIST who joined this site with a confession to make. I run red robots. Not just at night, not just when I'm in a hurry, but as a matter of course. Today a friend DRIVING behind me commented at how upset a carful of people got when I crossed halfway across Buitengracht over a red (as if I was a CYCLIST) because there was a left arrow and therefore I was not crossing anyone's legitimate path. This gave me some food for thought, so I've decided to consciously re-evaluate my attitude and spent a couple of hours on the net. Mostly I'm not a culprit of the other MOTORING bugbears - I always DRIVE "single file", with traffic not against, and I don't DRIVE on pavements. But red light jumping by MOTORISTs is a topic that evokes extremely passionate feelings in people, even here in this country where babies are raped regularly. Why is this? I've asked a lot of people, both CYCLIST and law-abiding MOTORISTs, why they get so upset and the most common reply is along the lines of "it's the law", "MOTORISTs must respect the rules if we are to respect them", "red light jumpers give MOTORISTs a bad name" and "MOTORISTs are arrogant and think they're above the law". But strangely, people don't argue that what the red-light-jumper is doing is dangerous. The consensus seems to be that these MOTORISTs are very careful to cross only when it's safe. That would make sense as most MOTORISTs are aware of their vulnerability and are conscious that a bump from cross-traffic at that intersection would probably be fatal. But almost never could a MOTORIST cause an accident that would hurt anyone other than him or herself. Strangely also, people don't argue that what the MOTORIST is doing is inconveniencing anyone. When the MOTORIST jumps the robot, no one has to wait for them or move out of their way. So why does everyone care so deeply about this issue? My guess is that CYCLIST get annoyed at having to share the road with slower-moving vehicles and point fingers at the law-breaking to justify their indignation. But daily I see drivers on their cellphones, cutting people off, drunk driving, speeding, joking about unpaid fines and even warning others about speed traps and roadblocks on Facebook as if speeding and drunken driving, which kills thousands, is a completely legitimate behaviour. MOTORISTs are almost incapable of speeding or killing anyone other than themselves. They are doing their bit to reduce congestion and pollution. What reason do drivers have to hate them other than their own impatience and self-righteousness? I would argue, in fact, that red light jumping by MOTORISTs promotes both safety AND the convenience of other road users. France has recently passed a law that allows MOTORISTs to turn right on red (the equivalent of turning left in South Africa). A study done in London showed that female MOTORISTs are more likely to be killed than male MOTORISTs, and states that this may be because they are also more likely to obey red lights, and then collide with vehicles pulling away from the lights: http://www.rudi.net/...16395��It's rather obvious when you think about it - a stable, moving MOTORIST behaving in a predictable way in front of you is safer than a MOTORIST taking off in their wobbly way, amongst three or four lanes of cars doing the same thing. Besides, what driver really wants to share that "go" moment at the robots with MOTORISTs? Do they not realise that having the queue by the robot free from MOTORISTs can only make it more convenient for them? I would really like someone to give me a sensible reason for stopping at the red light. I'm not one who follows the law blindly. If a law is stupid I relish in breaking it. So simply saying that it is against the law is not enough to persuade me to do something. However I'm well aware of the passionate hatred towards MOTORISTs because of this - as irresponsible, unreasonable, misplaced, exaggerated, and downright spiteful as it may be. I still intend to turn left on red. I still intend to go straight at a red with a side street to the right. But as a result of my mini-research mission, I've decided to show some willing and start to stop at red lights whenever my path crosses a lane of traffic that has a green. I'd like to hear some rational debate, or what everyone thinks about my attitude. For once I'd really like to hear people avoid suggesting running the offending MOTORIST down, opening the car door as he passes or slamming on brakes when he's behind you. If I have one take-home message: it's not an offence worth murdering someone over.
  19. One day you will proof to everybody that you WERE DEAD right......
  20. My last shipment, which has arrived last week, took about a week and a half...... With DHL I was previosly able to get my goods in 4 days but that was a record!
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout