Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 6.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

Alonso did a 1:42.6 in that v10 r25...a car not designed to run those MEDIUM compound Pirelli tires, a car not set up for this track (evident from it running out of gears on the straight)...and a car 15 years old so obviously not running at its absolute zenith of performance.

 

Thats only 5-6 seconds slower than a 2020 mercedes, the fastest f1 car in history... on soft compound tires in fp2. Im pretty sure a f2004, given a day for setup work, a new v10 engine and soft tires will come within 3 seconds of it.

 

And then there is the sound.

How many teams have we lost in the name of progress? And how far have we come? Sure the new cars are tech marvels but what did that ad to the show? Nothing.

Id rather watch this v10 running on its own around abi slaapie the whole weekend than watch the race on sunday haha.

 

Food for thought....

Edited by morneS555
Posted

https://www.crash.net/f1/news/950393/1/hamilton-wants-get-2021-f1-mercedes-deal-done-christmas

 

So I'm wondering - from a business perspective do Mercedes actually need to sign him?  Russell seems like he could step in quite easily, he would undoubtedly be available much cheaper than Hamilton, and the PR surrounding Mercedes giving the young protégé a seat would be huge.

 

I know they would probably never do it, but for me, take our business - we have a R4million asset - it's been fully depreciated.  It's still running well but there are signs that it's getting a bit glitchy.  Now I have a choice of getting a new Asset, at half the price, and which would be able to to the same job at arguably the same production rate, and will be able to be financed over 4 years, or I re-finance the old Asset at a higher cost than a new one and hope it remains reliable.

 

I know which way I would go I must be honest.  When I was doing my Engineer-in-Training at Iscor, my Mentor always said to me of business decisions - "If you want loyalty, get a dog"

Posted

https://www.crash.net/f1/news/950393/1/hamilton-wants-get-2021-f1-mercedes-deal-done-christmas

 

So I'm wondering - from a business perspective do Mercedes actually need to sign him?  Russell seems like he could step in quite easily, he would undoubtedly be available much cheaper than Hamilton, and the PR surrounding Mercedes giving the young protégé a seat would be huge.

 

I know they would probably never do it, but for me, take our business - we have a R4million asset - it's been fully depreciated.  It's still running well but there are signs that it's getting a bit glitchy.  Now I have a choice of getting a new Asset, at half the price, and which would be able to to the same job at arguably the same production rate, and will be able to be financed over 4 years, or I re-finance the old Asset at a higher cost than a new one and hope it remains reliable.

 

I know which way I would go I must be honest.  When I was doing my Engineer-in-Training at Iscor, my Mentor always said to me of business decisions - "If you want loyalty, get a dog"

 

It's probably not that simple, to get Russel now Merc would probably have to pay Williams as well to buy out his contract?

Posted

It's probably not that simple, to get Russel now Merc would probably have to pay Williams as well to buy out his contract?

I guess - we don't know what the terms would be.  But a Brian Joffe-type businessman would most likely look to Williams and remind them who is supplying their engines and would they like an additional percentage off the engine supply price in return for their driver?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout