Tumbleweed Posted July 2, 2014 Posted July 2, 2014 Well I guess we know who the bicycle asshole is now. Jules wouldn't have been my guess! You read it wrong. His tweet mentioned @bicycleasshole.
Tumbleweed Posted July 2, 2014 Posted July 2, 2014 Why don't they just all take it outside and go settle it 1980's way. Dance-off?
Guest EdEdEd Posted July 2, 2014 Posted July 2, 2014 This link to the letter that preceded the retracted tweet: https://docs.google....lRxMTFTRkE/edit What did it say?... my eyes was blinded by BIGASS PINK LETTERS
clivem Posted July 2, 2014 Posted July 2, 2014 This link to the letter that preceded the retracted tweet: https://docs.google....lRxMTFTRkE/editI wonder how far they would take a successful social media challenge to a post on the Hub for example. Would those who "liked" the post also be held liable?
Myra Posted July 2, 2014 Posted July 2, 2014 This link to the letter that preceded the retracted tweet: https://docs.google....lRxMTFTRkE/edit Its hard to take a letter of demand seriously when they start off by defining their client as "their client". Who else would they be acting on behalf of?And who includes case law in a letter of demand? Posturing much?
kingalton Posted July 2, 2014 Posted July 2, 2014 Well I guess we know who the bicycle asshole is now. Jules wouldn't have been my guess!I don't think its Jules, he commented on a tweet BA and ZK sent..
Wyatt Earp Posted July 2, 2014 Posted July 2, 2014 This link to the letter that preceded the retracted tweet: https://docs.google....lRxMTFTRkE/edit I am a bit lost here, so how is Jules implicated ?
Eldron Posted July 2, 2014 Posted July 2, 2014 You read it wrong. His tweet mentioned @bicycleasshole. Quite right - my bad! Jules replied to the "Dave's partner makes me suspicious" tweet..
Jules Posted July 2, 2014 Posted July 2, 2014 I see at least one person who got involved in the Twitter melee has withdrawn his tweet after receiving a letter from Sadlier. Yep. I'd much rather put my tail between my legs than spend a few thousand on a case I don't even feel that strongly about. The only winner in this tale will be Emma. In hindsight it would have been better to have kept quiet. In future I'll try and follow the excellent advice Eldron has dispensed on this thread.
Tumbleweed Posted July 2, 2014 Posted July 2, 2014 I am a bit lost here, so how is Jules implicated ? His reply to @zkrige was seen as defamatory.
Wyatt Earp Posted July 2, 2014 Posted July 2, 2014 Quite right - my bad! Jules replied to the "Dave's partner makes me suspicious" tweet.. I see that now, I can't say if his tweet is anti or pro FanD's tweet.
Tumbleweed Posted July 2, 2014 Posted July 2, 2014 Its hard to take a letter of demand seriously when they start off by defining their client as "their client". Who else would they be acting on behalf of?And who includes case law in a letter of demand? Posturing much? Most of the defamation letters of demand we receive here contain case law. It is indeed posturing. Intended to intimidate.
Tumbleweed Posted July 2, 2014 Posted July 2, 2014 Yep. I'd much rather put my tail between my legs than spend a few thousand on a case I don't even feel that strongly about. The only winner in this tale will be Emma. In hindsight it would have been better to have kept quiet. In future I'll try and follow the excellent advice Eldron has dispensed on this thread.
jcza Posted July 2, 2014 Posted July 2, 2014 Team Fedgroup doing a sterling job of ruining their own reputations (or rather whats left of it)
kingalton Posted July 2, 2014 Posted July 2, 2014 it seems (at)zkrige has removed himself from the twitterverse...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.