Jump to content

Dopers suck


fandacious

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, Jewbacca said:

These big teams are likely farming babies and harvesting stem cells for massive stem cell infusions and other things so far beyond 'doping' with traceable drugs and foreign agents.

Seriously, think way beyond what you get told at the Dr when you break your collar bone. People are currently re-growing teeth. TEETH. The things that don't even heal themselves with much efficiency.

 

that escalated quickly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

38 minutes ago, PygaSchmyga said:

that escalated quickly

It just astounds me how people see the advancements in medicine, stem cell research, gene splicing, re-connecting spinal chord injuries, growing teeth, manufacturing ligaments and tendons etc but still think performance enhancing is injecting prehistoric drugs, testosterone etc that falls under scrutiny in even the most basic of tests.

Things have moved on 

 

Edited by Jewbacca
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, DieselnDust said:

I was watching the Netflix Tour de France season 2 last night. The episode where vinegar took 98sec out of Pogi really sparked alarm bells, coupled to the next day where he took a further 6 min on Pogi.  Not just that but the way he romped away really reeked of 1999….

if he’s anywhere near a GC contender this yea after a punctured lung militant fans are going to be pouting more than urine on riders. The series has done a good job of reawakening what might have been forgotten….

Yeah, they even asked the question " ya thinks he's doping" 

From what I've learned from that show and the YouTube channel above, cheating or at best seeking gains by whatever means possible is just ingrained in cycling culture. Look at how the hair doping team go about riding other people off the road in sprints. Crazy.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Headshot said:

Yeah, they even asked the question " ya thinks he's doping" 

From what I've learned from that show and the YouTube channel above, cheating or at best seeking gains by whatever means possible is just ingrained in cycling culture. Look at how the hair doping team go about riding other people off the road in sprints. Crazy.

 

Hair doping team lol! For a guy who's always exuding confidence (if not, arrogance), the owner of said team looked VERY uncomfortable when asked a question about doping. His whole frame changed. 

*takes tin foil hat off* 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Jewbacca said:

It just astounds me how people see the advancements in medicine, stem cell research, gene splicing, re-connecting spinal chord injuries, growing teeth, manufacturing ligaments and tendons etc but still think performance enhancing is injecting prehistoric drugs, testosterone etc that falls under scrutiny in even the most basic of tests.

Things have moved on 

 

Also from what ive found, the tip of spear hardly evers goes into regulation...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if the Biological passport actually works. 

I am not exactly sure when they start tracking and excatly how it works, so please correct me if I am wrong. 

From my knowledge of it is that it tracks anomalies from the established levels of an athlete, so if you doped before they started tracking you, lets say from 13years and your levels was high from the start but they could not detect any of the drugs in your system, then you basically will never raise a flag if you continued to dope and your levels remained the same. 

I honestly think that is what is currently happening and why we are seeing so much younger guys on the podiums of the Grand tours. In the past guys only reached their prime for the 3 week races at the age of 28 onwards. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25-32 was prime before EPO.

there were a few riders who were exceptions to the rule. LeMond won his first Tour de France at 25

but ride his first at 23. I. Those days you couldn’t turn pro until you were done with U23. There was a more ancient period when that rule did not exist and the youngest winner was 21 I believe. I don’t think age is a good differentiator of performance.

@Jewbacca, I hear you on medical advancements but do you reckon these teams have budgets big enough to play around with experimental medical practices without there being some sort of highly influential partner in the background? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DieselnDust said:

25-32 was prime before EPO.

there were a few riders who were exceptions to the rule. LeMond won his first Tour de France at 25

but ride his first at 23. I. Those days you couldn’t turn pro until you were done with U23. There was a more ancient period when that rule did not exist and the youngest winner was 21 I believe. I don’t think age is a good differentiator of performance.

@Jewbacca, I hear you on medical advancements but do you reckon these teams have budgets big enough to play around with experimental medical practices without there being some sort of highly influential partner in the background? 

I think the age readiness has a lot to do with science and structure being introduced into junior sport (and sport in general) over the last 25 years. These kids have been exposed to structured training, fatigue tracking etc from a much younger age so there is little to no adjustment when reaching 'the big stage'.

Remco was being spoken about by LeFauvre as a future world champ when he was 16.

We tend to forget how much things have developed in the last 20 years. 25 years ago GU sachets were still 'new'. I remember the release of pre sealed corn syrup sachets being 'life changing' 30 years ago.

With regards the 'experimental medicine'.... well, history shows us that huge, complex, expensive Drug/Doctor rings have existed in the past, there is nothing to say they don't exist now. The methodology and treatment is just different

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Irvin85 said:

I wonder if the Biological passport actually works. 

I am not exactly sure when they start tracking and excatly how it works, so please correct me if I am wrong. 

From my knowledge of it is that it tracks anomalies from the established levels of an athlete, so if you doped before they started tracking you, lets say from 13years and your levels was high from the start but they could not detect any of the drugs in your system, then you basically will never raise a flag if you continued to dope and your levels remained the same. 

I honestly think that is what is currently happening and why we are seeing so much younger guys on the podiums of the Grand tours. In the past guys only reached their prime for the 3 week races at the age of 28 onwards. 

Shew. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find comfort in the fact that only now we are really starting to see EPO-era climbing records being challenged, and that is with 20+ years of technical, nutritional and training progress on the side of the current crop, not even to mention I think the amount of people trying to be pro is higher which means more opportunity to find the outliers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Jewbacca said:

I think the age readiness has a lot to do with science and structure being introduced into junior sport (and sport in general) over the last 25 years. These kids have been exposed to structured training, fatigue tracking etc from a much younger age so there is little to no adjustment when reaching 'the big stage'.

Remco was being spoken about by LeFauvre as a future world champ when he was 16.

We tend to forget how much things have developed in the last 20 years. 25 years ago GU sachets were still 'new'. I remember the release of pre sealed corn syrup sachets being 'life changing' 30 years ago.

With regards the 'experimental medicine'.... well, history shows us that huge, complex, expensive Drug/Doctor rings have existed in the past, there is nothing to say they don't exist now. The methodology and treatment is just different

Agreed and Pogacãr too. He was identified at 15 or something silly. First TDF win at 20 yrs old.
 

doping rings is an interesting tangent here. I asked a pathologist pal of mine some time ago about doping in younger kids because we know it’s rife in rugby and grid iron , contact sports, etc. I wanted to know if there were outward signs that one would look for in developing kids that were being groomed through dooong programs. He reckons it’s fairly easy to spot because their development rate accelerated faster than kids developing naturally, a lot faster but they tended to bulk up more and be taller which are not desirable traits for a cyclist.
But this happens at schools where there’s money and opportunity. Brink fit back to cycling, many cyclists don’t grow up I. Families with means, most have fairly humble beginnings and therefore less access to sophisticated doing programmes today. Those who get caught over the past 15yeara have tended to be fairly amateurish in their approach to cheating which the directs the discussion to sophistication and organisational support….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, dexterdent said:

I find comfort in the fact that only now we are really starting to see EPO-era climbing records being challenged, and that is with 20+ years of technical, nutritional and training progress on the side of the current crop, not even to mention I think the amount of people trying to be pro is higher which means more opportunity to find the outliers.

Indeed. I purposefully try to be naive about the whole thing, makes it far more enjoyable. I'm sure they are not eating pronutro for breakfast and microdosing and self testing can get you close to limits without breaking them. I'm sure if it is very murky as to how many are cross my heart and hope to die squeaky clean.

What I also find encouraging is that in the Lance era, the top guys got caught. Nowadays it seems that it is mainly the fringe guys who get popped. It makes the whole charade a lot more believable.

 

(I'm ignoring Astana. dodgy AF of course) 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Shebeen said:

Indeed. I purposefully try to be naive about the whole thing, makes it far more enjoyable. I'm sure they are not eating pronutro for breakfast and microdosing and self testing can get you close to limits without breaking them. I'm sure if it is very murky as to how many are cross my heart and hope to die squeaky clean.

What I also find encouraging is that in the Lance era, the top guys got caught. Nowadays it seems that it is mainly the fringe guys who get popped. It makes the whole charade a lot more believable.

 

(I'm ignoring Astana. dodgy AF of course) 

 

 

 

I think the fringe guys are getting popped because they can't afford or aren't invited to the good stuff.

They are still using drugs/PEDS that get pinged.

We need to move away from assuming these guys are drugged. I don't think many of them are in terms of what we know to be PEDS.

Stem cells assume the genetic construction of the body and adapt to what the body needs and the treatment isn't as expensive as you'd think. Recovery from injury WAY faster with a lot less effort needed by the body.

I'm on the 'physical enhancement' boat as nothing will show up in a drug test and nothing will show up on the passport.

Yes, teams will still drug, kids will still get pushed basic things to achieve Craven Week u16 glory and Paarl Boys can beat Gym every now and then, but the tippy top of the ice berg has left that era 

Anyway, TDF fever! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, J Wakefield said:

Shew. 

Are you saying if the Shew! Fits then wear it …??🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Jewbacca said:

I think the fringe guys are getting popped because they can't afford or aren't invited to the good stuff.

They are still using drugs/PEDS that get pinged.

We need to move away from assuming these guys are drugged. I don't think many of them are in terms of what we know to be PEDS.

Stem cells assume the genetic construction of the body and adapt to what the body needs and the treatment isn't as expensive as you'd think. Recovery from injury WAY faster with a lot less effort needed by the body.

I'm on the 'physical enhancement' boat as nothing will show up in a drug test and nothing will show up on the passport.

Yes, teams will still drug, kids will still get pushed basic things to achieve Craven Week u16 glory and Paarl Boys can beat Gym every now and then, but the tippy top of the ice berg has left that era 

Anyway, TDF fever! 

Fringe guys also hitting that colostrum I reckon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout