Jump to content

Tour de France 2019


gummibear

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

There is no minimum sock height rule... Guys could go full tri-athlete if they wanted.

 

I see they have also introduced a rule which states nothing can be worn that changes the morphology of the body. So those back things guys wore to make them more aero are a no no.

Isn’t that the reason for this sock rule?

Otherwise what’s the reason.....

Posted

Isn’t that the reason for this sock rule?

Otherwise what’s the reason.....

Well sock height doesn't really change the shape of the body.

 

Guys were wearing clothes with rigid shapes in them to make them more aero. This is now a no no.

 

Higher socks are more of a traditional, less drastic advantage.

 

So yes, the sock height is part of it, but they have gone further to now ban anything worn on or under the clothes that changes body morphology. Clothes may not have more than a 1mm weave depth difference and only traditional safety (read helmets) and modesty (can't ride waxed in a thong) regulation apparel can be worn.

 

It's pretty clear.

Posted

The idea is to ban compression socks so the maximum height is to limit the compression effect on the calf muscles. The compression socks apparently aid in pumping blood back to the heart so it becomes an area where E&S can just get silly for marginal gains

Posted

The idea is to ban compression socks so the maximum height is to limit the compression effect on the calf muscles. The compression socks apparently aid in pumping blood back to the heart so it becomes an area where E&S can just get silly for marginal gains

Well they've banned all the decent drugs. Whats a team to do these days? :-) 

Posted

Peloton happy with this composition, lets the break go up the road.

Tony Martin is charged with keeping the break in check.

 

They lead by 6min16.

 

The Panzerwagen is running in economy mode currently, just ticking it over.

 

Can you guys remember the day he decided to go on a breakaway with Alaphillipe, was awesome to see the panic stations in the peloton. 

Posted

Don't want to get anybody excited over nothing, but there is a fair amount of wind blowing....

 

We just need a 45° odd change in the direction the riders are riding and some wide open spaces to see some chaos ensue....

post-27827-0-29639600-1562588635_thumb.png

Posted

Don't want to get anybody excited over nothing, but there is a fair amount of wind blowing....

 

We just need a 45° odd change in the direction the riders are riding and some wide open spaces to see some chaos ensue....

40km time and it turns left...

Posted

Well sock height doesn't really change the shape of the body.

 

Guys were wearing clothes with rigid shapes in them to make them more aero. This is now a no no.

 

Higher socks are more of a traditional, less drastic advantage.

 

So yes, the sock height is part of it, but they have gone further to now ban anything worn on or under the clothes that changes body morphology. Clothes may not have more than a 1mm weave depth difference and only traditional safety (read helmets) and modesty (can't ride waxed in a thong) regulation apparel can be worn.

 

It's pretty clear.

And a hunch pack under (camelpak) the shirt

 

????

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout