Dopers suck

[Underachiever]

So no testing at all in bowls?

 

How about snooker, golf, archery, skeet shooting etc?

I'm also in favour of letting bowls slide.  #oumensalies

[intern]

The trouble with most doppers is that, once caught, they simply refuse to show a healthy dose of embarrassment and remorse for their rule breaking behaviour.

 

It is human to err.

It is also human to show pain at making an error.

 

The best a dopper can do is to apologise and then make amends by 'carrying water' for the cycling community. Serve fruit at the water point, mentor the young ones, in an authentic way of course, etc.

 

Opening a bicycle shop is another ironic way to profit from the sport.

 

If you love the sport, do not cheat, Cupcake.

 

Nope, a doper should not be anywhere near the young ones. And preferably nowhere near 'the sport', either...

[intern]

Lekker little old boys club... still reaping the rewards of their years of fraud.

 

So remorseful they'll happily hold rides to celebrate their great names, launch clothing lines and enjoy sponsored celebrity appearances at events. All their way of giving back of course to the sport and riders they stole so much from.

 

Always wanted to ride "Doping Twat Gran Fondo vol 6.3.1"

 

Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the buying public.

[DieselnDust]

Yes! Absolutely!!! She's a filthy DOPER and should be ostracized from the Bowls fraternity and because the ban extends to other sports she should be banned from social Bridge tournaments too. 

BINGO!!

[DieselnDust]

Not sayin that at all just aksing a few q's

 

1. Why are they testing non licensed rider with full time jobs?

HUH?? They go after anyone at a sanctioned event through random dope testing. Yu want blood , got it and now don't know what to do with it??

2. Can they not write a more profession report?

Written in third person, typical for this sort of hearing and meeting minutes etc.

3. On some of those cases they dont seem to agreed if the person is guilty or not but still gives 4 year ban etc.

In cases where the panel is hung they take a decision on balance of probability. As they say guilty until you can prove yourself innocent

[Quagga]

 

Not sayin that at all just aksing a few q's

 

1. Why are they testing non licensed rider with full time jobs?

HUH?? They go after anyone at a sanctioned event through random dope testing. Yu want blood , got it and now don't know what to do with it??

 

 

This is my question, why they hell did they test the oke at the Epic that only made cutoff by like 5 minutes. 

And does this mean, I (non licensed rider, riding for fun normally come in around 3 last) need to check everything my doc gives me when I knie acts up etc because I might be test at Sani 2 C when we "Racing" to make cut-off? 

[Eldron]

This is my question, why they hell did they test the oke at the Epic that only made cutoff by like 5 minutes.

And does this mean, I (non licensed rider, riding for fun normally come in around 3 last) need to check everything my doc gives me when I knie acts up etc because I might be test at Sani 2 C when we "Racing" to make cut-off?

Side issue - be careful taking anti inflamatories - some types are not great for endurance/dehydration.

[Quagga]

Side issue - be careful taking anti inflamatories - some types are not great for endurance/dehydration.

Heard about that......kidney issue in a beeeeeeg way apparently.

[DieselnDust]

This is my question, why they hell did they test the oke at the Epic that only made cutoff by like 5 minutes.

And does this mean, I (non licensed rider, riding for fun normally come in around 3 last) need to check everything my doc gives me when I knie acts up etc because I might be test at Sani 2 C when we "Racing" to make cut-off?

 

Ya it literally means we have to check what we putting in. My beef (excuse the clenbuterol pun) with the system is that it does not place any burden of proof on the companies that make the supplements or food stuffs we eat. A true champion it seems grows their own food organically and then wins on bread and red wine

Edited October 23, 2018 by DieselnDust

[Quagga]

 

This is my question, why they hell did they test the oke at the Epic that only made cutoff by like 5 minutes. 

And does this mean, I (non licensed rider, riding for fun normally come in around 3 last) need to check everything my doc gives me when I knie acts up etc because I might be test at Sani 2 C when we "Racing" to make cut-off?

 

???

[Escapee..]

This is my question, why they hell did they test the oke at the Epic that only made cutoff by like 5 minutes. 

And does this mean, I (non licensed rider, riding for fun normally come in around 3 last) need to check everything my doc gives me when I knie acts up etc because I might be test at Sani 2 C when we "Racing" to make cut-off? 

 

Yes you need to check what you are putting in your body.

 

Rules are rules

[intern]

Yes you need to check what you are putting in your body.

 

Rules are  is rules

 

This is a serious discussion, please treat it as such. Have corrected your slack grammar...

[Spinnekop]

Yes you need to check what you are putting in your body.

 

Rules are rules

Jip.

 

True.

 

Difference is just......we as funriders don't give a rats ass if we are sanctioned and SAIDS just wasted R3000 on a test that could have been used to catch criminals defrauding an occupation called sport.

 

So why do they do it?

 

SAIDS gets a positive.  They get coverage/marketing value etc.  They get more funding for their own salaries and going on road trips across the country.

[Quagga]

Jip.

 

True.

 

Difference is just......we as funriders don't give a rats ass if we are sanctioned and SAIDS just wasted R3000 on a test that could have been used to catch criminals defrauding an occupation called sport.

 

So why do they do it?

 

SAIDS gets a positive.  They get coverage/marketing value etc.  They get more funding for their own salaries and going on road trips across the country.

Thank you for putting it in the words I was looking for :-)

[Eldron]

Jip.

 

True.

 

Difference is just......we as funriders don't give a rats ass if we are sanctioned and SAIDS just wasted R3000 on a test that could have been used to catch criminals defrauding an occupation called sport.

 

So why do they do it?

 

SAIDS gets a positive. They get coverage/marketing value etc. They get more funding for their own salaries and going on road trips across the country.

It sounds like fun conspiracy theory but how exactly does SAIDS identify juiced fun riders to test? I would guess random fun rider testing nets far fewer positives than pros/winners.

 

Surely if getting positives meant more money they'd target winners and vets (if what thehub says if true)?

 

Watch this video - it will give you some insight into testing guidelines.

[Quagga]

It sounds like fun conspiracy theory but how exactly does SAIDS identify juiced fun riders to test? I would guess random fun rider testing nets far fewer positives than pros/winners.

 

Surely if getting positives meant more money they'd target winners and vets (if what thehub says if true)?

 

Watch this video - it will give you some insight into testing guidelines.

Video link please