Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

And generalising like that does not make it any better, does it? Neither does focusing exclusively on the negative - I'm sure you could find a positive for every negative you posted, but you chose not to. Anyway, looks like tandem is not for me then...

 

That's why I added the "socially" - some amazing achievements in many other fields of course.

 

It is, however,  impossible to find a positive to match centuries of apartheid, colonies, plundering, slave trade etc.

  • Replies 79k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Eugene Oppelt

    4545

  • Hairy

    4360

  • gummibear

    3909

  • Eddy Gordo

    3867

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

That's why I added the "socially" - some amazing achievements in many other fields of course.

 

It is, however,  impossible to find a positive to match centuries of apartheid, colonies, plundering, slave trade etc.

 

This is not the thread you're looking for..

Posted (edited)

It is, however,  impossible to find a positive to match centuries of apartheid, colonies, plundering, slave trade etc.

 

Maybe move this to the politics section.

Edited by sias
Posted

Doh. It seems I am out of date.

 

Edit: While I do think most of us whites are a little unaware of our "we ruled the world for for centuries" inherent attitude equating "white" directly to arrogance, ignorance, oppression etc is ridiculous.

 

after reviewing my comment.. It seems to be a wee bit snarky.. sorry, I'm trying to be better

 

I have a Issue with big corporations trying to be a moral Compass, the 2 big companies in the news this week for their moral stance is coco-cola (less white), and Disney (Gina Carano Firing)

Posted

after reviewing my comment.. It seems to be a wee bit snarky.. sorry, I'm trying to be better

 

I have a Issue with big corporations trying to be a moral Compass, the 2 big companies in the news this week for their moral stance is coco-cola (less white), and Disney (Gina Carano Firing)

 

No need for apologies. I got all ready, fire, aim at people without knowing the real story myself (irony at it's purest).

 

If anyone should apologise it should be me. My bad everyone!

Posted

No need for apologies. I got all ready, fire, aim at people without knowing the real story myself (irony at it's purest).

 

If anyone should apologise it should be me. My bad everyone!

I apologise for liking Eldrons comment. 

Posted

unsure of exact purpose of this thread, but I DO have an idea for a really new thread...

 

 

a NEW thread I personally would value is that in my 10-odd year absence from cycling, after 'burn out' :) , so much has changed; just buying new set of wheels for commuting, its' now though axles versus skewer, Boost replacing non-Boost, but what YEAR did that roughly happen, LUST versus Tubeless-ready versus 'full' tubeless....

 

...me being a bit OLDER, and slightly less 'tech', it would be cool for younger / more tech savvy riders to start a thread where they tackle a single technology, and give a brief overview of what is current, and what is IS replacing, or HAS replaced - for example, the purpose of a CLUTCH on a (bicycle) derailleur...? Short cage vs medium cage versus long cage...

 

Next rider maybe writes it could be useful to understand TAPER versus non-taper...

next rider gives AXLE options on mountain-bikes.... (TA vs Skewer versus 'other'?)

next rider explains ramification of fitting RIGID fork to a hard-tail frame, when building Monstercross/Gravel tourer....

 

now THAT I would pay beer money for!

Chris

to translate..

sheldon died and no one has taken up the slack

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout