Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

NIce idea however i think legally apologies are an admission of guilt open you to all sorts of legal consequences so unless you want to be liable aka Lance for fraud, perjury etc and the possible ramifications of that whole lot, so any legal person would tell you to stay quiet no matter how much you want to say sorry.

 

Maybe that is the reason for the very thin story......

 

And it seems like legal advice is what is causing this whole storm to have blown up. 

 

Damages done already are pretty considerable if you start to draw it out, so there are a lot of potential people who would be willing to take up cudgels and fund their own lawyers.

 

I think there are class action suits now in South Africa although I am not sure they are applicable here. Also not enough of a legal beagle to know about whistle blower cases like the USA where as the initiator you can benefit. Floyd Landis is looking to fund is future out of the money they are clawing back from Lance.

 

If I was Kevin I would also shut up and say nothing no matter how the twitter verse exploded and flamed him. 

 

 

 

But this isn't a case of whistle-blowing.    

 

Oh, and Floyd seems to be getting nothing...

Edited by Tumbleweed
Posted

If I was Kevin I would also shut up and say nothing no matter how the twitter verse exploded and flamed him. 

Well - learning not to fan the flames would also be a good idea....

Posted

But this isn't a case of whistle-blowing.    

 

Oh, and Floyd seems to be getting nothing...

Sure agreed. 

 

Technically there were people blowing the whistle prior to the admission? See the handbag war on twitter. Which was then repudiated by some of the parties involved through their counsel.

 

FWIW and not sure if i am teaching you to suck eggs but it is  a particular class of law suit, where the person who makes the US IRS services aware of a fraud and they successfully prosecute , that person can be a beneficiary to the tune of a percentage of the reward.

 

Its a US thing, not sure its applicable here and it doesn't need you to be the first person to "blow the whistle" if you get what i am saying.

 

This one has many parallels......

 

Any many parties aggrieved, who may see common cause.

 

Then they get together and share costs. Also sometimes seen as a class action - US Law thrives on these.

 

So really not sure if it could happen here...

 

But there was an international event, so jurisdiction of international courts could be applicable to that.

 

You see how this gets ugly quickly

Posted (edited)

dunnow how I am ever going to recover menally...oh wait.. i'm already over it...

No crucifixion here. We're not in Jerusalem.

But it's easy to end up on the wrong side of the game even when not intending to break any rules / laws.

Edited by raptor-22
Posted

Sure agreed. 

 

Technically there were people blowing the whistle prior to the admission? See the handbag war on twitter. Which was then repudiated by some of the parties involved through their counsel.

 

FWIW and not sure if i am teaching you to suck eggs but it is  a particular class of law suit, where the person who makes the US IRS services aware of a fraud and they successfully prosecute , that person can be a beneficiary to the tune of a percentage of the reward.

 

Its a US thing, not sure its applicable here and it doesn't need you to be the first person to "blow the whistle" if you get what i am saying.

 

This one has many parallels......

 

Any many parties aggrieved, who may see common cause.

 

Then they get together and share costs. Also sometimes seen as a class action - US Law thrives on these.

 

So really not sure if it could happen here...

 

But there was an international event, so jurisdiction of international courts could be applicable to that.

 

You see how this gets ugly quickly

 

The Floyd case was based on the fact that government funds were being used for illegal purposes. The point about this not being a whistle-blower case is that the sanction stems from anomalies being detected on the ABP. Not on the basis of the Twitter accusations. Floyd provided information on how the fraud was allegedly carried out. He could back it up. Converting an oft-repeated slander to a libel is not whistle-blowing.

Posted

The Floyd case was based on the fact that government funds were being used for illegal purposes. The point about this not being a whistle-blower case is that the sanction stems from anomalies being detected on the ABP. Not on the basis of the Twitter accusations. Floyd provided information on how the fraud was allegedly carried out. He could back it up. Converting an oft-repeated slander to a libel is not whistle-blowing.

aha thanks for the clarification.

 

Like I said I am not the legal genius but i could see common cause amount some of the parties involved.....

Guest Lancesball
Posted

Fair enough - brand awareness & sales not necessarily the same thing

 

Out of interest, you remember that Kevin Evans rode Volcon and Merckx bikes even though it happened aeons ago and the bikes not taking off - I would say that is a pretty good argument for how putting a pro on a your bike creates brand awareness!

 

I remember him being a rider on the Microsoft / MTN / Energade team as they lost and gained sponsors. They had those bikes as a sponsor. Same as Lampre riding Willier for many years until the Merida change.

Posted

IMO this thread is all but spent. Lines drawn, walls up, opinions concreted in. Now just arguing for the sake of wanting to have the last word.

:nuke:

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout