Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Dangle

 

Maybe a NOBODY was harsh.

 

He would have been a SOMEBODY like the following 15 guys who finished immediately ahead of him in his last tour prior to his "cancer".

 

 

Laurent Dufaux

Vicente Aparicio

Jean-Cyril Robin

Arsenio Gonzalez

Federico Muñoz

Vladimir Poulnikov

Massimo Podenzana

Laudelino Cubino

Laurent Brochard

Beat Zberg

Yvon Ledanois

Johan Bruyneel

Oscar Pelliccioli

Alberto Elli

Jean-François Bernard

Herminio Diaz

 

Most of them are complete nobodies to anyone outside hard core cycling circles (except JB now, maybe, and only because of his LA involvement).

 

That was the sense in which I used the term......

 

I knew thumbup1.gif

I was just taking a dig knowing that the haters would have something to add clap.gif

 

Beat Zberg, now there is a wasted talent.

  • Replies 3.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

 

 

I knew thumbup1.gif

I was just taking a dig knowing that the haters would have something to add clap.gif

 

Beat Zberg, now there is a wasted talent.

 

Damn. Now thats a name I haven't heard in ages.

 

Seems silly but I reckon Fat Jan is the most wasted talent in cycling. Can you imagine the skillz if he didn't start the season 10kg overweight after smacking pills and crashing Porsches? The mind boggles!

Posted

I knew thumbup1.gif

I was just taking a dig knowing that the haters would have something to add clap.gif

 

Beat Zberg, now there is a wasted talent.

His brother Marcus was the better of the two if I recall... Sjoe, I am getting old devil.gif
Posted

My personal opinion on all of this...

I can't stand Lance as a person, he typifies for me the selfish nature of the modern human being. Beyond the doping, it's more the bullying, the corruption and the great big fraud that is his 'story'.

 

As an athlete though, you have to respect what he did and drove himself to do. He didn't just dope his way to 7 tours, the doping was just a part of the process. He wasn't just the best doper, he trained hard and perfected every other aspect required to win the tour, and he did it. I don't like what he did, and I'm glad he has gone down in flames, but the guy was the best of a bad bunch...

 

That said, I'd have a heap load more respect for the guy if he actually just came clean and donated much of his massive wealth to fighting the scourge that is doping. If he gave a toss about the sport and wanted to try make right what he did, that could be a way out for him. I'm not holding my breath though.

Posted

Damn. Now thats a name I haven't heard in ages.

 

Seems silly but I reckon Fat Jan is the most wasted talent in cycling. Can you imagine the skillz if he didn't start the season 10kg overweight after smacking pills and crashing Porsches? The mind boggles!

 

Made him interesting...Go Jan thumbup1.gif

Posted

Damn. Now thats a name I haven't heard in ages.

 

Seems silly but I reckon Fat Jan is the most wasted talent in cycling. Can you imagine the skillz if he didn't start the season 10kg overweight after smacking pills and crashing Porsches? The mind boggles!

Ullrich with Lance's 'determination' = drool.gif
Posted

That said, I'd have a heap load more respect for the guy if he actually just came clean and donated much of his massive wealth to fighting the scourge that is doping. If he gave a toss about the sport and wanted to try make right what he did, that could be a way out for him. I'm not holding my breath though.

 

I'm with you on all fronts...except the last bit.

 

So the others 'fessed up. Hincapie for example. He 'fessed up after he retired and with a USADA gun to his head. To me that doesn't make it any better than Lance.

 

Also - my big question is - why bother? 6 month ban for Hincapie or lifetime ban for Armstrong makes zero difference in my book. They get to keep it all - fame, cash and lifestyle.

 

It's like me defrauding my company of millions then 'fessing up when I'm 65 and they tell me I can keep the cash but never work for them again. Big frikkin deal.

 

In my opinion the whole USADA investigation resulted in a few wrist smacks - no real punishment was meeted out...

Posted

 

I aint no fanboy but you have to admire the length's the man would go to to win.

 

my point exactly. To claim he didnt do anything different from any other rider is just fkn stupid

Posted (edited)

I'm with you on all fronts...except the last bit.

 

So the others 'fessed up. Hincapie for example. He 'fessed up after he retired and with a USADA gun to his head. To me that doesn't make it any better than Lance.

 

Also - my big question is - why bother? 6 month ban for Hincapie or lifetime ban for Armstrong makes zero difference in my book. They get to keep it all - fame, cash and lifestyle.

 

It's like me defrauding my company of millions then 'fessing up when I'm 65 and they tell me I can keep the cash but never work for them again. Big frikkin deal.

 

In my opinion the whole USADA investigation resulted in a few wrist smacks - no real punishment was meeted out...

I agree in some regard, the ban is basically a token, but Lance was the big gun, he had the shares in the team, he had the control and the power - he drove the doping machine. Many of those guys quite possibly did it because of Lance. I also think while it might not hit their pockets (although Levi got fired!), their images will never be the same.

Hincapie (and the same goes for Leipheimer, VDV etc) was an American cycling legend, now he goes down in history as a doping cheat. His great rides at Roubaix, his Tour de France stage win... everyone knows he did it through doping. It's not the same level as Lance, but I do feel their has been severe damage to their reputations as great American cyclists.

 

There is also that A-hole Bruyneel who we will hopefully never see managing a rider again in his life! (the various doctors etc too who have been booted etc)

Edited by ChunkyMunky
Posted

 

 

Guys, can we get one thing straight, that the guys were all doping most certainly does not equal a level playing field.

 

Science.

 

It will never be really straight because how much of an advantage did he have, over whom at what stage ?

There will always be more questions than there are answers.

Posted (edited)

Guys, can we get one thing straight, that the guys were all doping most certainly does not equal a level playing field.

 

Science.

Maybe not but its not like LA was the only one with access to Ferrari. You pays your money and spend your time - you gets your advantage.

 

Its no different to the science of training, recovery, equipment etc. None of those are a level playing field in the sense that each guy / team works hard as hell to tilt the field in their own favour.

Edited by dracs
Posted

Haters and fans aside I always remember his come back tour. That stage when they were riding along the coast. I think it was HTC saw the change in road direction coming and went to the front and upped the pace. As the road did a turn away from the coast the wind came from the side and everyone was guttered. Peleton was torn to shreds but LA saw it coming and was in the break with HTC. AC who is no slouch tactically lost around 5 minutes if I remember correctly.

 

Yep, he is not a nice guy and he doped to the gills but he did a lot of other stuff right.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout