Cheabb78 Posted September 21, 2020 Posted September 21, 2020 I also only saw that article I dont known if this relates to that but Ciro normally has pretty credible sources Jessie couldn't they just have give us like a week. https://twitter.com/cirogazzetta/status/1308085455775305728?s=19 https://twitter.com/cirogazzetta/status/1308088012203528194?s=19 Method, IV's? https://twitter.com/inrng/status/1308088639482744832?s=19Looks like it's linked...
Frosty Posted September 21, 2020 Posted September 21, 2020 Speechless [emoji1750] How the winner is calculated.Mount is stages, flat surface stages and narrow stages. https://twitter.com/grootlem/status/1307909466042576896?s=21
Gen Posted September 21, 2020 Posted September 21, 2020 Speechless [emoji1750] How the winner is calculated.Mount is stages, flat surface stages and narrow stages. https://twitter.com/grootlem/status/1307909466042576896?s=21Oh man that's so embarrassing
Vetplant Posted September 21, 2020 Posted September 21, 2020 Speechless [emoji1750] How the winner is calculated.Mount is stages, flat surface stages and narrow stages. https://twitter.com/grootlem/status/1307909466042576896?s=21Ja those narrow races were quite thrilling, no wonder it is always the skinny okes that seem to win these stuff...
Gen Posted September 21, 2020 Posted September 21, 2020 Ja those narrow races were quite thrilling, no wonder it is always the skinny okes that seem to win these stuff... [emoji1787]
Gen Posted September 21, 2020 Posted September 21, 2020 https://www.cyclingnews.com/amp/news/french-police-open-doping-investigation-after-arkea-samsic-hotel-search-at-tour-de-france/?__twitter_impression=true A little more info. The biggest surprise here is news of the search only coming out now after the search was carried out last week already..how'd they keep that under wraps so long. And French anti doping was not in the loop either..
Vetplant Posted September 21, 2020 Posted September 21, 2020 It is always funny how much of the suspicion of doping goes to the winner of a race. In reality you can do a bad job at doping and still be beaten by a once-in-a-lifetime whipper snapper. The bottom teams are just as likely to dope as the top teams. Come to think of it, the smallest teams without results should be investigated first, as they seem to be the ones with the most to gain from it.
Gen Posted September 21, 2020 Posted September 21, 2020 It is always funny how much of the suspicion of doping goes to the winner of a race. In reality you can do a bad job at doping and still be beaten by a once-in-a-lifetime whipper snapper. The bottom teams are just as likely to dope as the top teams. Come to think of it, the smallest teams without results should be investigated first, as they seem to be the ones with the most to gain from it.Yep
Vetplant Posted September 22, 2020 Posted September 22, 2020 https://twitter.com/xavierdisley/status/1308009665696063488
TNT1 Posted September 22, 2020 Posted September 22, 2020 how'd they keep that under wraps so long. And French anti doping was not in the loop either..Asked and answered.
TheoG Posted September 22, 2020 Posted September 22, 2020 Speechless [emoji1750] How the winner is calculated.Mount is stages, flat surface stages and narrow stages. https://twitter.com/grootlem/status/1307909466042576896?s=21 Yip, no other words for it than speechless! Surely they not from planet Earth ...
s14phoenix Posted September 22, 2020 Posted September 22, 2020 Speechless [emoji1750] How the winner is calculated.Mount is stages, flat surface stages and narrow stages. https://twitter.com/grootlem/status/1307909466042576896?s=21 Yip, no other words for it than speechless! Surely they not from planet Earth ... Janee... big story but clearly the research is lacking... reporting on the biggest sporting event in the world and nobody did the homework - surely a sports reporter should get their facts straight.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.