rouxtjie Posted February 5, 2016 Share kkekekekeke...nog een. Let violin music begin.... Here is hoping the epic shows zero tolerance. the nerd 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tumbleweed Posted February 5, 2016 Share The CSA not commenting muddies things. UCI who listed her doesn't seem to offer more than an AAF mention on this: http://www.uci.ch/mm/Document/News/CleanSport/17/32/52/20160203SanctionsADRVEN2.0_English.pdf Does anyone actually know anything more about this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest notmyname Posted February 5, 2016 Share kkekekekeke...nog een. Let violin music begin.... Here is hoping the epic shows zero tolerance.Would be quite controversial if they went back on the banning cheats initiative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tumbleweed Posted February 5, 2016 Share Does an 11-month sentence sound more like a "you should have known better" than a "you cheated" sentence to anyone? Gerry Hattrick, cat-i, scotty and 3 others 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcza Posted February 5, 2016 Share If her ban is until end of 2015 then what's the point? Sentence supposedly served and away she goes or am I missing something? What ban? During the "ban" she podium'd at the Epic, won J2C, podium'd at Sani, won SA Champs etc. My thinking is as follows: Adverse finding at the Epic under auspices of UCI. Process then followed and CSA advised of this. CSA keep all this very quiet as she is competing under a cloud but still sees fit to have her as SA Champ. UCI publishes finding and sanction on website and CSA is now forced to issue a statement, which they have done. A new low for CSA (as if they can go any lower). PS: Hanco please stop racing with known dopers, your tweets have zero credibility. Andrew Steer, andydude, DaBombBikes and 4 others 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raptor-22 Posted February 5, 2016 Share Firstly TUE's are a joke. Never heard of one being granted so taking moral high ground "applying for TUE is simple enough" doesn't help anyone as that's a theoretical construct. There are plenty or people who develop elevated hbp for a while and exercise while medicated to treat the condition. Can't assess the situation without understanding what was being treated. If anything at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gen Posted February 5, 2016 Share Isn't she a qualified gp/Dr?Not the same Yolande (I think it's Yolande du Toit that is the Dr) Edited February 5, 2016 by Gen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rouxtjie Posted February 5, 2016 Share Does an 11-month sentence sound more like a "you should have known better" than a "you cheated" sentence to anyone?true true....BUT No epic, ever again......that one is going to hurt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcza Posted February 5, 2016 Share Firstly TUE's are a joke. Never heard of one being granted so taking moral high ground "applying for TUE is simple enough" doesn't help anyone as that's a theoretical construct.There are plenty or people who develop elevated hbp for a while and exercise while medicated to treat the condition. Can't assess the situation without understanding what was being treated. If anything at all Other than Froome of course Tumbleweed and Meezo 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tumbleweed Posted February 5, 2016 Share true true....BUT No epic, ever again......that one is going to hurt No disputing that! I would just like some more info on what actually happened...too much of vagueness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rouxtjie Posted February 5, 2016 Share Firstly TUE's are a joke. Never heard of one being granted so taking moral high ground "applying for TUE is simple enough" doesn't help anyone as that's a theoretical construct.There are plenty or people who develop elevated hbp for a while and exercise while medicated to treat the condition. Can't assess the situation without understanding what was being treated. If anything at alluhm, you apply for one and once you have it you can carry on racing with the medication. Seems simple to me. You don't have to be caught in the act of taking the banned substance/s to be regarded as a doper. jimmycool 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patchelicious Posted February 5, 2016 Share It's simple. If you need meds, get a TUE! These people who are so sick that they NEED meds but are still strong enough to win. Imagine then how fast they would be if they weren't sick, holy moly! Tatt, Meerkat82, Smurfy and 12 others 15 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patchelicious Posted February 5, 2016 Share Other than Froome of courseAt least he got his before racing. If he raced without one, well bye bye Mr RuleBreaker jimmycool 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilipV Posted February 5, 2016 Share Well the Epic had a rule against rogue riders. If you are caught riding over private property, no more epic for you. Then Sauser was caught on Lourensford, a huge hoohah was made about it, the epic back pedalled on their rule, and Suzy went on to win again. Zero credibility left. andydude, stringbean, raptor-22 and 6 others 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tumbleweed Posted February 5, 2016 Share Well the Epic had a rule against rogue riders. If you are caught riding over private property, no more epic for you. Then Sauser was caught on Lourensford, a huge hoohah was made about it, the epic back pedalled on their rule, and Suzy went on to win again. Zero credibility left. If Suzy gets popped for doping, the Internet will explode... PhilipV, Pants Boy and Gen 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rouxtjie Posted February 5, 2016 Share Well the Epic had a rule against rogue riders. If you are caught riding over private property, no more epic for you. Then Sauser was caught on Lourensford, a huge hoohah was made about it, the epic back pedalled on their rule, and Suzy went on to win again. Zero credibility left.Lets see how they animal farm this one...... Don't drop the ball KV..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now