Jump to content

Canyon Aeroad - Read if you planning on purchasing one


button

Recommended Posts

Posted

Must remember to add “can areotuck all day long” to the list of benefits of riding bikes with steel frames

Was just thinking the same thing - my "lightweight" is titanium and my heavywieight a master - The beauty about riding these is that aerotuck never comes into the equation.  Fortunately, because I'm fairly certain I'd crash. But good to know that should I want to move up from the middle of the pack, I can aero

  • Replies 602
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

100%... and when you write it out it seems so logical. This is, however, the problem then - "Practically it has worked and many people do it"

 

When you get to the other side of a climb and you bleeding from your eyeballs and other riders around are aero-tucking, doing a simple engineering analysis and math problem is not an option and its so easy to follow suite. What makes it even easier to get into this position is that you have seen it before - without issues. And people cant use the monkey see monkey do argument because inherently that is how humans learn EVERYTHING! Bad and good... If every time a pro sat on a TT and went straight through the bicycle you would not even attempt the position. It seems logical the way you explained it but its frequency leads to it being less common a logic as some may think.

 

And never mind my weight. By your calculations a 60kg rider is still expecting the top tube to support over 150x its weight...

 

And surely by this example bike manufacturers need to make consumers more aware of this issue? Or as some alluded, add 100-200g of carbon to the top tube and stop compromising your frames to make outrageous marketing statements.

 

Is it Friday yet?

It’s got FA to with math and engineering analysis.

 

It’s should be your built in survival instinct... the thing that stops most people from becoming Darwin statistics.

 

Side question, I wonder if in the case of a bad / fatal accident while riding like this and the insurance found out.... would they pay benefits to your beneficiaries?

Posted

I don't think it is as simple as adding 200g of carbon to the TT.

 

Each tube is engineered to do a specific job, and it is the function of the seat tube to support the rider's seated weight.

 

Ensuring that the TT can also be used as a saddle and must be designed and tested as such, will have far reaching consequences to the entire science of frame design (and not only for Canyon and Spez)

I don't know why the OP is complaining about the crack - he road the bike in a way it is not designed to be ridden - cracked 3 frames from the same actions - and he complains.....

 

What Buttons should be doing is thanking Canyon for the quality of their build that saved him from paying me multiple VERY expensive and painful visits.... because the frame survived well enough that he did not land on his head - and he carried on riding afterwards.... seems to me that he owes Canyon at least 3 lives.... he should be grateful..... very....

Posted

I'm thinking back to Ctct. I got dropped on Chappies due to okes trying to beat science, had to wait for the carnage to clear and then chase.

Coming down toward hout bay I simply made myself as small as possible; head low and steady, arms tucked in. And I caught several groups except the main bunch. I caught a couple of okes supertucking. I'll never forget the look on their faces. I think they figured there was no way they could be caught up if using that position.

 

I'm not convinced it's any faster, it's a hell of a lot less safe and you can't corner very well..

Posted

I'm thinking back to Ctct. I got dropped on Chappies due to okes trying to beat science, had to wait for the carnage to clear and then chase.

Coming down toward hout bay I simply made myself as small as possible; head low and steady, arms tucked in. And I caught several groups except the main bunch. I caught a couple of okes supertucking. I'll never forget the look on their faces. I think they figured there was no way they could be caught up if using that position.

 

I'm not convinced it's any faster, it's a hell of a lot less safe and you can't corner very well..

 

Yeah and going down chappies in that position with a myriad of other riders being as unpredictable as possible doesn't sound like the smartest thing to do

Posted

I'm thinking back to Ctct. I got dropped on Chappies due to okes trying to beat science, had to wait for the carnage to clear and then chase.

Coming down toward hout bay I simply made myself as small as possible; head low and steady, arms tucked in. And I caught several groups except the main bunch. I caught a couple of okes supertucking. I'll never forget the look on their faces. I think they figured there was no way they could be caught up if using that position.

 

I'm not convinced it's any faster, it's a hell of a lot less safe and you can't corner very well..

 

 

this (plus the lies my bathroom scale tells)  is the reason I'm faster on the downhills

 

http://www.gifmania.co.uk/Space-Animated-Gifs/Animated-Astronomy/Astronomers/Isaac-Newton/Newton-And-Apple-Tree-90808.gif

Posted

I'm thinking back to Ctct. I got dropped on Chappies due to okes trying to beat science, had to wait for the carnage to clear and then chase.

Coming down toward hout bay I simply made myself as small as possible; head low and steady, arms tucked in. And I caught several groups except the main bunch. I caught a couple of okes supertucking. I'll never forget the look on their faces. I think they figured there was no way they could be caught up if using that position.

 

I'm not convinced it's any faster, it's a hell of a lot less safe and you can't corner very well..

 

I was also the one that used to go down a hill faster than most in the group.  I always was under the impression that my fat 85 odd kilo body had something to do with it as I never thought of aero tucking.  May I suggest packing a few pies down your throat before every ride.  :whistling:

Posted

I was also the one that used to go down a hill faster than most in the group. I always was under the impression that my fat 85 odd kilo body had something to do with it as I never thought of aero tucking. May I suggest packing a few pies down your throat before every ride. :whistling:

Fun science fact - the only (theoretical) difference to performace that weight makes is in the wind resistance.

Posted

At 70kg I have less mgh to convert into 1/2mv^2

But the 2X0 watts does help.

Pork pies will need a good stuffing. I much prefer the Indian delicacy samoosas

Now that will give you real gas

Posted

Fun science fact - the only (theoretical) difference to performace that weight makes is in the wind resistance.

 

yes 

 

'cause us dik ouens are round and the skinny ones are built like a box with a nice flat front

 

http://www.3villagecsd.k12.ny.us/TechnologyEducationWebsite/technotebook/aerodynamics_files/image003.jpg

Posted

Time for some more science - thanks to wind resistance you don't have to super tuck if the guy in front of you is super tucking. You can happily stay seated doing a semi tuck and you'll catch up to super tucker. That way he takes the risk of cracking his frame while you gain all the advantage.

 

There is zero need whatsoever to risk for your frame by super tucking during training.

 

I get that we all want to be cool and pro and **** but risking your frame to be cool is a little silly.

 

Risking your front teeth is a little bit silly.  :huh:

Posted

I'm thinking back to Ctct. I got dropped on Chappies due to okes trying to beat science, had to wait for the carnage to clear and then chase.

Coming down toward hout bay I simply made myself as small as possible; head low and steady, arms tucked in. And I caught several groups except the main bunch. I caught a couple of okes supertucking. I'll never forget the look on their faces. I think they figured there was no way they could be caught up if using that position.

 

I'm not convinced it's any faster, it's a hell of a lot less safe and you can't corner very well..

What nobody seems to consider is the legal risk. You supertuck. You have less control. Something goes wrong. Pile up results. People are injured or heaven forbid, killed. There's a strong argument to be made that you were not only negligent but downright reckless. You find yourself facing multiple personal injury claims. Insolvency beckons (and then maybe divorce too). There's also a culpable homicide charge (maybe a private prosecution) and the risk not only of a criminal record but also maybe even of some time in prison. All this to see if you can maybe gain a few fractions?
Posted

Given that I am one of the jerks on this thread a more even reply is probably in order...

...

Button weighs 86kg but only partially sits on the top tube - maybe 2/3 of his weight - ~60kg.

...

 

I'm still stuck at this point, I think it's probably a fraction of that in actual fact. We should also probably be talking in Newtons too by now to sound really engineery.

 

You have both hands and feet on the bike as contact points and then this disputed sitting on the top tube. There's no real gain to have so much force on the TT, you might as well have that all on your feet and just hover your butt on the TT. any little bump in the road is going to be proper eina if you sit on it.

 

but if you're really going to sit there, then doff your cap back to the 80's BMX days and get some decent foam on it

4ZkUW.jpg

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout