Jump to content

Enduro/gravity bike suspension and geo


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

The 2.3 version, 100% agreed. 2.5WT - not so sure. 

 

BUT. For people looking for an aggressive XC tyre for the front, the Aggressor would be far better than, say, an Ikon. 

 

I don't know, man. The Maxxis range has basically got everything covered. 

 

I'm now running a pair of 2.6" Rekons and they're fekkin' good all-rounders. Would much rather run that as opposed to an Aggressor for XC purposes. Think you're straight line braking isn't going to be all that great with the Aggressor. 

Posted (edited)

Which bike is the Butcher on? Mojo HDR? 

have it on my tallboy, and it works really well there...so I though it would be great on my HD3 ..

 

Nope .... had a awful ride on Sunday trying to find grip...

 

so the DHR WT back on the front and Ive kept the Purgatory on the back... I find it does roll nicer than the Aggressor I took off. Both 2.3 

Edited by Toads.Mojo
Posted

Isn't what we ride really just aggressive XC anyway. 

I dunno, man. I don't really care about what e-bikes are doing in races, and I don't use lycra. Also not likely to wear a tapout t-shirt or complain that my no-fat soy milk frapachappalatte has too many sprinkles of cocao on top. 

 

Maybe I'm just a chillduro type of guy. 

Posted

The Aggressor has nice hard center knobs and the softer edging knobs seem well supported. Should roll like a demon. (It also smells nice and I like the name) Looking forward to a possible test ride later if my spouse can be persuaded to shuttle me a few km...

Posted

Just hope it holds out and does not slip out at speed......could be a nasty accident!

Transitioning from a soft to a hard knob dramatically improves performance. 

Posted

While on the subject of tyres, who here has gone from around a 25mm ID rim to about a 30mm ID rim. I'd like to go slightly wider to make full use of Maxxis' WT tyres, but I'm gonna be pissed if I replace perfectly good rims and then feel virtually no difference out on the trail. 

Posted (edited)

I'm on the fence with this type of thing. When I bought my jeffsy 2 of my mates told me that the stock rim width was basically unusable and that I should immediately throw away the stock wheels. I could honestly not feel a difference between ZTR's on hopes over the stock wheels the bike comes with.

 

I'd want actual measured data from a rider I respect before I'd commit. And even then I'd weigh that cost up over another performance upgrade such as a few days with a shock wiz for example. If I destroy a wheel then yes.

 

The only non stock items on my bike are the rear shock and the cockpit. But the cockpit is just personal preference rather than any perceived performance advantage.

Edited by Duane_Bosch
Posted

I'm on the fence with this type of thing. When I bought my jeffsy 2 of my mates told me that the stock rim width was basically unusable and that I should immediately throw away the stock wheels. I could honestly not feel a difference between ZTR's on hopes over the stock wheels the bike comes with.

 

I'd want actual measured data from a rider I respect before I'd commit. And even then I'd weigh that cost up over another performance upgrade such as a few days with a shock wiz for example.

I'm with you on that viewpoint. It's such a fractional change, and the biggest benefit is a bit more volume so lower pressures can be run.

Posted (edited)

I'm on the fence with this type of thing. When I bought my jeffsy 2 of my mates told me that the stock rim width was basically unusable and that I should immediately throw away the stock wheels. I could honestly not feel a difference between ZTR's on hopes over the stock wheels the bike comes with.

 

I'd want actual measured data from a rider I respect before I'd commit. And even then I'd weigh that cost up over another performance upgrade such as a few days with a shock wiz for example. If I destroy a wheel then yes.

 

The only non stock items on my bike are the rear shock and the cockpit. But the cockpit is just personal preference rather than any perceived performance advantage.

https://m.pinkbike.com/news/rim-widths-comparison-test-mountain-bike.html

 

This is the best write up I've read to date. Not sure if you respect Matt Wragg...

I personally felt a small difference in grip, but that was thanks to the slightly higher volume the wider rim allowed (went from 24 to 35mm internal) with the same tyres. How much of that was the rim build (assymetric rims, so better spoke tension and stiffer wheel) vs placebo vs riding on different days and weighting the tyres differently, I don't know. I just know I was able to drop the pressure a smidge.

 

Whether that would have remained true with a 28/30/32 mm rim, I haven't got any real world experience on the comparisons but I can sorta deduce how it would change by thinking about it.

 

Tyre profile is also very important, imo. Squareish tread patterns would square off even more, which means transition to side knobs happens earlier and tearing may be a problem due to this.

 

But hey, it wasn't nearly as big of a difference as going from the Pike RC to the Lyrik RC2 and Marzo.

Edited by Captain Fatbastard Mayhem

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout