Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am all for the new innovations and we saw it being used in World cups last year - you would think with all that testing they would know the flaws on design, I am sure they have done there homework properly. 

Any hopes that this new tech will bring down pricing for 'older' eagle products? Or will they just throw it right in at R30k+ over the current AXS XX1 🙄
My frame would probably take the newly designed derailleur but my bank balance couldn't 😂

Really like the design on the cranks!!

  • Replies 316
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

There will be those that mock it, ridicule it, find fault and make up false facts about it to knock it down some more.
And then there will be those that will sleep outside the shop to be the first to have it on their bikes.

This stuff may be clever and beautiful, but OMG its expensive!
 

Posted
1 minute ago, BaGearA said:

This is an awesome step forward and was very cleverly done 

 

but 

 

We needed more reliable NX and cheaper GX/XO ......the money poured into this could've been spent better i feel 

I think you will see the trickle down of current mechanical XX1/XO/GX to NX/SX which will be a big win for budget conscious riders and bike marketers

Posted
Just now, peepeekaitjie said:

Idk, this is pretty cool. When is Sram going to make a front derailleur that works?

🤣🤣🤣🤣

Posted
13 minutes ago, HdB said:

One perspective on this:

 

Very interesting. So it looks like I can save my bucks for now and keep my XTR/GX AXS on my MTB/Gravel bikes 😅

Posted
10 hours ago, Me rida my bicycle said:

And the new XO crank looks interesting. 

Not like any of these would be in the average persons budget so ja it looks interesting and that's about it ... 

will eventually filter down to the tier drivetrains 

Posted
2 hours ago, PhilipV said:

This is very streamlined and tucked away nicely. Maybe it will stay out of harms way.
But the last time I broke a derailleur I felt the rock hit the underside of my foot, and take the derailleur out on the way back. This fancy one would not have made it. 
It seems that SRAM and frame makers have decided it’s better to have the rider’s wallet be the sacrificial item. 

Sounds like you need bigger feet

Posted
2 hours ago, NotSoBigBen said:

I have to just chuckle when I see the anoraks 'debating' these things .... so the next frame I buy, for the next while anyway, do I have to choose if its SRAM or 'traditional' and stick with that? Nah they know what they can do with that idea, to me anyway

The question is, would you even consider buying a bike that does not have SRAM on it :P

Yes, I like SRAM.

Posted
34 minutes ago, Hairy said:

The question is, would you even consider buying a bike that does not have SRAM on it :P

Yes, I like SRAM.

who else makes MTB drivetrans? No one  know of

Posted
12 hours ago, Hairy said:

 

 

You two uncles must stop using dial up internet when viewing the articles.

@WIPEOUT 1000 I have done many a thousand KM over a good many years, and not once bent a rear der. Broken a frame or two, but never damaged a hanger.

Shimano better pick up their game, or else they will be left just shifting gears on basic commuter and roadie bikes :P

I am aware that the majority of millennials and Gen Z’s generally form their opinions on whatever is trending on social media and/or what the Google/Youtube algorithms pushes to the top.

Furthermore, I appreciate that everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but as the saying goes “not his own facts.”

In this case, if you want to make a constructive contribution to this discussion, I suggest you consider a bit more science/engineering and less marketing hype.

I’ve attached a link to an unsponsored video, explaining why this is truly a very poor engineering solution.

“Mechanical Engineer's Opinion of new SRAM Eagle”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rDxgxHiijF0

 

 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, WIPEOUT 1000 said:

I am aware that the majority of millennials and Gen Z’s generally form their opinions on whatever is trending on social media and/or what the Google/Youtube algorithms pushes to the top.

...

I’ve attached a link to an unsponsored video, explaining why this is truly a very poor engineering solution.

“Mechanical Engineer's Opinion of new SRAM Eagle”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rDxgxHiijF0

lol.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout