Jump to content

David George reduction in sanction


News bot

Recommended Posts

Everyone is complaining about a reduction of 2 months. And that for doping.

 

 

How many of you bitch and moan when a murderer or rapist gets parole and join society again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 150
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Everyone is complaining about a reduction of 2 months. And that for doping.

 

 

How many of you bitch and moan when a murderer or rapist gets parole and join society again?

if only they criminalised drug use in sport... imagine getting 2 years jail time for doping. I think you'll solve the problem in no-time.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey,

 

To those saying it is right that he got a reduction in his sentence for assisting SAIDS, maybe you can fill us in on what assistance he provided. I have not seen the benefit of his assistance, no visible change in testing regime, no names of suppliers given, no additional busts. Maybe the peloton is clean since he got bust.

 

If he has materially assisted and changed the way SAIDS operates then fair play to him. Normally athletes that want to return to sport after an adverse analytical finding do have to submit to testing prior to returning. Has this process been followed?

 

Why did he apply for a two month reduction? What does he gain from it?

 

I have written to SAIDS and formally requested a detailed explanation as to how DG complied with the rule cited in the statement. This was post a twitter interaction with their account. @Edgartheathlete is my twitter handle.

 

I will let everybody know the outcome.

 

Cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey,

 

To those saying it is right that he got a reduction in his sentence for assisting SAIDS, maybe you can fill us in on what assistance he provided. I have not seen the benefit of his assistance, no visible change in testing regime, no names of suppliers given, no additional busts. Maybe the peloton is clean since he got bust.

 

If he has materially assisted and changed the way SAIDS operates then fair play to him. Normally athletes that want to return to sport after an adverse analytical finding do have to submit to testing prior to returning. Has this process been followed?

 

Why did he apply for a two month reduction? What does he gain from it?

 

I have written to SAIDS and formally requested a detailed explanation as to how DG complied with the rule cited in the statement. This was post a twitter interaction with their account. @Edgartheathlete is my twitter handle.

 

I will let everybody know the outcome.

 

Cheers

Please do Stu....I see they wanted to communicate via pvt email channel...why though, shouldnt it be transparent.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey,

 

To those saying it is right that he got a reduction in his sentence for assisting SAIDS, maybe you can fill us in on what assistance he provided. I have not seen the benefit of his assistance, no visible change in testing regime, no names of suppliers given, no additional busts. Maybe the peloton is clean since he got bust.

 

If he has materially assisted and changed the way SAIDS operates then fair play to him. Normally athletes that want to return to sport after an adverse analytical finding do have to submit to testing prior to returning. Has this process been followed?

 

Why did he apply for a two month reduction? What does he gain from it?

 

I have written to SAIDS and formally requested a detailed explanation as to how DG complied with the rule cited in the statement. This was post a twitter interaction with their account. @Edgartheathlete is my twitter handle.

 

I will let everybody know the outcome.

 

Cheers

 

Maybe he gave them a lead on Impey... :whistling:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please do Stu....I see they wanted to communicate via pvt email channel...why though, shouldnt it be transparent.

 

Amen - apart from if the info is being used in a current investigation.

 

Other question is - why wait 22 months then decide to co-operate?

 

My guess is - he decided on a come back - found a race he wanted to do as part of said come back - realised he couldn't do it so decided to "suddenly do the right thing".

 

Crap thing about cheaters - once they've cheated it's tough to trust them.

 

Would you let a convicted fraudster do your books, a convicted pedophile work at your child's creche, a driver with multiple tickets/accidents drive your company vehicle?

 

EPO for me is an OUT OUT OUT drug - plenty other careers for dopers to follow - especially ones on the wrong side of 35 with zero prospects for being pro riders again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there can never be just black or white, it's impossible. No matter where you draw the line in the sand guys will come up to it and get lumped in with the guys who were there in the first place.

"Only thing in the middle of the road is a white line and/or roadkill"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

seems more of a warning shot from SAIDS saying that "hey, we got some scoop and will be busting more riders soon"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes I have and was only told this last week, instead of 4 gold medals at National track championship I now will be awarded a 5th in replacement off 1 of my 2 silvers medals. I would be quite willing trade all these medals for just 1 medal at world track champs next month - does not matter the color! Not particularly angry with Mr Short at the track championship event but I will never know if he was negative at SA road champs - he may have cost me the victory their a few months before track champs.

 

What does surprise me is why somebody would knowingly race on a stimulant. What even surprise me more is SAIDS cannot give an answer to certain product sold in RSA! Last week I sent them a email sighing a few product which I would like to know if legal or illegal - still no answer! One of the product I believe I was given in the Cycle tour goodie bag - Airmune. I was thinking of using it before traveling to Worlds in Manchester as I have a tendency to pick up "viruses / cold" on long haul flights.

 

I am not a doctor or a chemical engineer - personally I think the stimulant list is way too long and as Mr Short discovered, a product over the counter can land you with a 2 year ban. The drug list in my opinion should be not much longer than 10 items (we cannot even obey the Biblical 10 commandment) containing those items which definitely improve perform - EPO, Blood doping, Steroids etc

 

On the testing front, WADA need to design test (which can test beyond masking agents) for what they are trying to prevent sports people from using. For WADA / SAIDS to say caught because of a masking agent is almost a guilty as the sports person (my opinion) - design the test to catch the sports person for the drug not a masking agent! The test must be able to be good enough to test / see beyond a masking agent - yes easier said than done but is it impossible?

 

This morning I received this - So basically what looks OK to the sports person may not be OK. Not easy to be 100% clean! I don't think the defense of I was not trying to cheat will hold up.

 

"Dear Peter

 

Thank you for your query on Linctagon C, Airmune and Lifepak Nano. Please read my comments below carefully regarding the guidelines on the status of Linctagon C, Airmune and Lifepak Nano

 

Linctagon C, Airmune and Lifepak Nano are all classified as alternative products

 

We do not include Complementary/Homeopathic or Alternative Products/Medications/Ingredients/OTC or Sport Supplement Products/Substances on our database for the reasons below. However, I am able to provide you with guidelines on the status and use of the listed ingredients of the above-mentioned product

 

Please read my comments below very carefully.

 

We do not endorse the use of any Supplements Products/Substances and Complementary/Alternative Medications/Products/Ingredients as it does not adhere to a quality assurance programme and its use is not regulated. We will only give comment on its stated ingredients as companies that manufacture Supplement Products/Substances and Complementary/Alternative Medications/Products/Ingredients are not obliged to list all their ingredients on its packaging AND MAY INCLUDE PROHIBITED INGREDIENTS THAT ARE NOT LISTED. We only endorse and approve registered medicines and drugs as its use and ingredients are regulated by a central body, the Medicines Control Council.

 

The Institute does not endorse the efficacy (do what it claims to do) of a Supplement Products/Substances and/or Complementary/Alternative Products/Medications/Ingredients or Supplements. We can however comment on the listed ingredients of a Supplement Product/Substance and or a Complementary/Alternative Product/Medication./Ingredient and whether any of the ingredients or its metabolites fall on the 2014 List of Prohibited Substances in Sport.

 

The listed ingredients of Linctagon C, Airmune and Lifepak Nano does not fall on the 2014 List of Prohibited Substances.

 

In conclusion it is important that I communicate the following to you when you are considering using supplements:

There are no guarantees that a supplement is safe to use

You need to assess the need for you to use supplements

You need to assess the risk involved of using supplements

For further information on supplements I would also like to direct you to the Informed Sport website http://www.informed-sport.com/ for a list of supplement batches that are tested by that organisation.

 

This status recommendation is made on the current information supplied. Ingredients may change without notice. As a result you use these products at your OWN RISK (irrespective whether the ingredients are permitted) and individuals should approach the use of it with caution.

 

I have also attached our sports supplement position statement for your perusal

 

Herbalife Products

This consists of a wide range of products and falls into the Complementary/Homeopathic or Alternative Products/Medications/Ingredients/OTC or Sport Supplement Products/Substances category. If you can provide me with the names of the specific herbalife products as well as the individual links on the internet where I can find the listed ingredients, I can provide you with guidelines on its use.

 

 

FAHMY GALANT

General Manager"

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe this is why I believe the list should be about 10 items long. WADA / SAIDS I believe put way to much responsibility on the Athlete. Surely they should be testing all product available from Herbal teas available at the local grocer - to prescription drug? If they are not then to have such a comprehensive list of ban substance in "not fair" on the sports person. Is that "playing fair?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yoh, from Icycling's post, taking any supplements not manufactured in an MCC facility is like playing Russian Roulette.

 

One basically needs to find out then from the MCC which manufacturers abroad's quality processes are recognised, if at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe this is why I believe the list should be about 10 items long. WADA / SAIDS I believe put way to much responsibility on the Athlete. Surely they should be testing all product available from Herbal teas available at the local grocer - to prescription drug? If they are not then to have such a comprehensive list of ban substance in "not fair" on the sports person. Is that "playing fair?"

 

Correct, unless they research all products they will only be a reactive entity, and not pro-active.

This means that you may race a whole season with someone taking performance enhancing substances legally, purely because it has not been "proven illegal"

 

Seems this whole thing is a balls-up of mammoth proportions

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This morning I received this - So basically what looks OK to the sports person may not be OK. Not easy to be 100% clean! I don't think the defense of I was not trying to cheat will hold up.

 

"Dear Peter

 

Thank you for your query on Linctagon C, Airmune and Lifepak Nano. Please read my comments below carefully regarding the guidelines on the status of Linctagon C, Airmune and Lifepak Nano

 

Linctagon C, Airmune and Lifepak Nano are all classified as alternative products

 

We do not include Complementary/Homeopathic or Alternative Products/Medications/Ingredients/OTC or Sport Supplement Products/Substances on our database for the reasons below. However, I am able to provide you with guidelines on the status and use of the listed ingredients of the above-mentioned product

 

Please read my comments below very carefully.

 

We do not endorse the use of any Supplements Products/Substances and Complementary/Alternative Medications/Products/Ingredients as it does not adhere to a quality assurance programme and its use is not regulated. We will only give comment on its stated ingredients as companies that manufacture Supplement Products/Substances and Complementary/Alternative Medications/Products/Ingredients are not obliged to list all their ingredients on its packaging AND MAY INCLUDE PROHIBITED INGREDIENTS THAT ARE NOT LISTED. We only endorse and approve registered medicines and drugs as its use and ingredients are regulated by a central body, the Medicines Control Council.

 

The Institute does not endorse the efficacy (do what it claims to do) of a Supplement Products/Substances and/or Complementary/Alternative Products/Medications/Ingredients or Supplements. We can however comment on the listed ingredients of a Supplement Product/Substance and or a Complementary/Alternative Product/Medication./Ingredient and whether any of the ingredients or its metabolites fall on the 2014 List of Prohibited Substances in Sport.

 

The listed ingredients of Linctagon C, Airmune and Lifepak Nano does not fall on the 2014 List of Prohibited Substances.

 

In conclusion it is important that I communicate the following to you when you are considering using supplements:

There are no guarantees that a supplement is safe to use

You need to assess the need for you to use supplements

You need to assess the risk involved of using supplements

For further information on supplements I would also like to direct you to the Informed Sport website http://www.informed-sport.com/ for a list of supplement batches that are tested by that organisation.

 

This status recommendation is made on the current information supplied. Ingredients may change without notice. As a result you use these products at your OWN RISK (irrespective whether the ingredients are permitted) and individuals should approach the use of it with caution.

 

I have also attached our sports supplement position statement for your perusal

 

Herbalife Products

This consists of a wide range of products and falls into the Complementary/Homeopathic or Alternative Products/Medications/Ingredients/OTC or Sport Supplement Products/Substances category. If you can provide me with the names of the specific herbalife products as well as the individual links on the internet where I can find the listed ingredients, I can provide you with guidelines on its use.

 

 

FAHMY GALANT

General Manager"

 

Similar to saying "Take it and if it comes up as a banned substance we will let you know when we bust you"

A simple YES NO would be so much easier

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like SAIDS/WADA needs a reason to exist. :devil: . I wonder if the  Sr. Vet from this years Attakwas that was suspended for 2 years cause his doctor gave him a fat loss pill can also ask for a reduction as he clearly only wanted to loose fat. (I stand to be corrected on the race)

M2C. :whistling:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout