gogo@ Posted September 16, 2014 Share Why would SAIDS agree to the 2 month reduction?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChUkKy Posted September 16, 2014 Share David took EPO for proper cheating, just like Lance. Brandon took testosterone for a piel styf, maybe the same reason as Nolan Hoffman Mailman7412 and Smurfy 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Smimby Posted September 16, 2014 Share Where? I would like to see what the fuss is about. I see you can buy it from Canada, but its 1200 dollars for 12 syringes!!  Hahaha you want me to get banned here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Smimby Posted September 16, 2014 Share Ok is a relative thing. I won't support Nolan because of his doping history - I won't support David or Brandon either. If I was a team owner I would not employ any of them. So in your eyes should all ex dopers be welcomed back into racing with open arms once they've completed their sentence? Regardless of drug choice and number of busts? In your eyes should ALL drugs carry the same sentence?  Not what I said...but what you said... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eldron Posted September 16, 2014 Share Not what I said...but what you said... Whaaat? I said different drugs = different sanctions. Whats your take or is it easier to ask the questions than answer them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eldron Posted September 16, 2014 Share David took EPO for proper cheating, just like Lance.Brandon took testosterone for a piel styf, maybe the same reason as Nolan Hoffman Dude - Nolan is a sprinter - like Cipo - those okes are hard as rock and get all the chicks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdrianDJ Posted September 16, 2014 Share Nolan Hoffman to his coach "does my bum look big in these pants?" ShortLegs and Jakkals. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rouxtjie Posted September 16, 2014 Share No love lost between DG and local pro's https://twitter.com/JarrydHaley/status/511810942104260608 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rpedro Posted September 16, 2014 Share Kevin is not teaming up with DG. And DG is eligible for Epic because he got his ban prior to the Epic changing the rules. ratherberidin' 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jakkals. Posted September 16, 2014 Share No love lost between DG and local pro's https://twitter.com/JarrydHaley/status/511810942104260608  Never thought that that would change Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ratherberidin' Posted September 16, 2014 Share Honestly, I feel so desensitized about pro's doping I don't even care anymore. It's a sad state to be in, but honestly, do we really think the pro's that aren't banned are clean? A lot are, a LOT haven't been caught. NH, DG, LA and all the rest are very talented cyclists that made bad calls in a worse environment. Losing to someone who dopes shouldn't be a reason to dope, but honestly, given the circumstances I can't say all reasonable men I know, myself included, wouldn't choose what they did. Nayr, Gen and Squier 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ratherberidin' Posted September 16, 2014 Share Kevin is not teaming up with DG. And DG is eligible for Epic because he got his ban prior to the Epic changing the rules.Im glad he can race Epic again Wuzzie 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kosmonooit Posted September 16, 2014 Share No matter what anyone says the Epic has got it right. You get caught and we will never see you again. Finish and Klar!  So would that apply to Daryl Impey? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwissVan Posted September 16, 2014 Share So would that apply to Daryl Impey? No silly...he was innocent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carbon29er Posted September 16, 2014 Share So would that apply to Daryl Impey?The hearing bought his Bill Clinton "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" defense which makes him not guilty of doping as opposed to post by SwissVan claiming he was innocent. Impey was not innocent, if he was innocent he would not have not have had a case to answer, he took a masking agent but could explain how it got into his system. A bit like the stain on the little black dress. SwissVan and Mousea 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patchelicious Posted September 16, 2014 Share This sets a bad example for youngsters. There are degrees of wrong I suppose for doping, but non of them carry a hard enough sanction. Look at both DG and Hoffman. They get caught, go away for a while and come back as if nothing happened. It really is currently worth the small risk of being caught vs these light sanctions. Even winning!! Just a side note, people were very quick to accept SAIDS ruling on Impey being first guilty then innocent but this 2 month reduction is being lambasted. Either SAIDS is really a bunch of weirdos or we are a fickle bunch. Edited September 16, 2014 by Patchelicious Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now