rouxtjie Posted February 5, 2016 Posted February 5, 2016 kkekekekeke...nog een. Let violin music begin.... Here is hoping the epic shows zero tolerance. the nerd 1
Tumbleweed Posted February 5, 2016 Posted February 5, 2016 The CSA not commenting muddies things. UCI who listed her doesn't seem to offer more than an AAF mention on this: http://www.uci.ch/mm/Document/News/CleanSport/17/32/52/20160203SanctionsADRVEN2.0_English.pdf Does anyone actually know anything more about this?
Guest notmyname Posted February 5, 2016 Posted February 5, 2016 kkekekekeke...nog een. Let violin music begin.... Here is hoping the epic shows zero tolerance.Would be quite controversial if they went back on the banning cheats initiative.
Tumbleweed Posted February 5, 2016 Posted February 5, 2016 Does an 11-month sentence sound more like a "you should have known better" than a "you cheated" sentence to anyone? cat-i, Gerry Hattrick, Skubarra and 3 others 6
jcza Posted February 5, 2016 Posted February 5, 2016 If her ban is until end of 2015 then what's the point? Sentence supposedly served and away she goes or am I missing something? What ban? During the "ban" she podium'd at the Epic, won J2C, podium'd at Sani, won SA Champs etc. My thinking is as follows: Adverse finding at the Epic under auspices of UCI. Process then followed and CSA advised of this. CSA keep all this very quiet as she is competing under a cloud but still sees fit to have her as SA Champ. UCI publishes finding and sanction on website and CSA is now forced to issue a statement, which they have done. A new low for CSA (as if they can go any lower). PS: Hanco please stop racing with known dopers, your tweets have zero credibility. intern, Andrew Steer, andydude and 4 others 7
raptor-22 Posted February 5, 2016 Posted February 5, 2016 Firstly TUE's are a joke. Never heard of one being granted so taking moral high ground "applying for TUE is simple enough" doesn't help anyone as that's a theoretical construct. There are plenty or people who develop elevated hbp for a while and exercise while medicated to treat the condition. Can't assess the situation without understanding what was being treated. If anything at all
Gen Posted February 5, 2016 Posted February 5, 2016 (edited) Isn't she a qualified gp/Dr?Not the same Yolande (I think it's Yolande du Toit that is the Dr) Edited February 5, 2016 by Gen
rouxtjie Posted February 5, 2016 Posted February 5, 2016 Does an 11-month sentence sound more like a "you should have known better" than a "you cheated" sentence to anyone?true true....BUT No epic, ever again......that one is going to hurt
jcza Posted February 5, 2016 Posted February 5, 2016 Firstly TUE's are a joke. Never heard of one being granted so taking moral high ground "applying for TUE is simple enough" doesn't help anyone as that's a theoretical construct.There are plenty or people who develop elevated hbp for a while and exercise while medicated to treat the condition. Can't assess the situation without understanding what was being treated. If anything at all Other than Froome of course Tumbleweed and Meezo 2
Tumbleweed Posted February 5, 2016 Posted February 5, 2016 true true....BUT No epic, ever again......that one is going to hurt No disputing that! I would just like some more info on what actually happened...too much of vagueness.
rouxtjie Posted February 5, 2016 Posted February 5, 2016 Firstly TUE's are a joke. Never heard of one being granted so taking moral high ground "applying for TUE is simple enough" doesn't help anyone as that's a theoretical construct.There are plenty or people who develop elevated hbp for a while and exercise while medicated to treat the condition. Can't assess the situation without understanding what was being treated. If anything at alluhm, you apply for one and once you have it you can carry on racing with the medication. Seems simple to me. You don't have to be caught in the act of taking the banned substance/s to be regarded as a doper. jimmycool 1
Patchelicious Posted February 5, 2016 Posted February 5, 2016 It's simple. If you need meds, get a TUE! These people who are so sick that they NEED meds but are still strong enough to win. Imagine then how fast they would be if they weren't sick, holy moly! andydude, cat-i, Gen and 12 others 15
Patchelicious Posted February 5, 2016 Posted February 5, 2016 Other than Froome of courseAt least he got his before racing. If he raced without one, well bye bye Mr RuleBreaker jimmycool 1
PhilipV Posted February 5, 2016 Posted February 5, 2016 Well the Epic had a rule against rogue riders. If you are caught riding over private property, no more epic for you. Then Sauser was caught on Lourensford, a huge hoohah was made about it, the epic back pedalled on their rule, and Suzy went on to win again. Zero credibility left. Meezo, intern, andydude and 6 others 9
Tumbleweed Posted February 5, 2016 Posted February 5, 2016 Well the Epic had a rule against rogue riders. If you are caught riding over private property, no more epic for you. Then Sauser was caught on Lourensford, a huge hoohah was made about it, the epic back pedalled on their rule, and Suzy went on to win again. Zero credibility left. If Suzy gets popped for doping, the Internet will explode... Pants Boy, PhilipV and Gen 3
rouxtjie Posted February 5, 2016 Posted February 5, 2016 Well the Epic had a rule against rogue riders. If you are caught riding over private property, no more epic for you. Then Sauser was caught on Lourensford, a huge hoohah was made about it, the epic back pedalled on their rule, and Suzy went on to win again. Zero credibility left.Lets see how they animal farm this one...... Don't drop the ball KV.....
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now