Jump to content

Cheating in Races  

103 members have voted

  1. 1. What should be done to an offending rider?

    • Ban from future races?
      30
    • Name & Shame and report to CSA?
      46
    • Take him/her behind the shed and shoot them?
      11
    • Confiscate the bike and hand it to a previously disadvantaged rider?
      14
    • Leave the offender alone to wallow in his greatness?
      2


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

OK, questions 3 & 4 are more tongue in cheek....

 

What prompted this poll is the following (ex my post in the Attakwas thread)...

 

 

 

On going through the SS results, it appears that someone might have been a naughty boy.

 

The SS winner, Nico Van Zyl rode the last +-36k's from Waterpoint 4 in a time of +- 1hr 52m. However, there appears to have been a rider that rode the last 36km's in a time of 47 minutes.

 

By comparison, the overall race winner Urs Huber was 30 minutes slower than that rider and took a pedestrian 1hr 17minutes for the same distance.

 

I don't know what logical reason there would be for being 30 minutes quicker than the overall race winner.

 

BTW, there is a picture of the offending individual crossing the finish line on his bicycle.

 

edit: took out the individuals race number and his finishing position.

Edited by Thug
  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

POSSIBLE :whistling: :whistling: :whistling: :whistling: :whistling: :whistling: BUT VERY UNLIKELY

 

46kph by my calculation - so 10kph slower than freewheeling down the steep side of Northcliff hill.... or given 34x18 gearing, about a cadence of 200rpm.... or slightly more....

 

Drop a clutchplate on your foot for saying it's possible.... a BIG one :)

Guest Latent Blue
Posted

POSSIBLE

Agh man, dont try and brag now... downhill does count dips!

Posted

46kph by my calculation - so 10kph slower than freewheeling down the steep side of Northcliff hill.... or given 34x18 gearing, about a cadence of 200rpm.... or slightly more....

 

Drop a clutchplate on your foot for saying it's possible.... a BIG one :)

 

 

Bwahahaha

Posted

OK, questions 3 & 4 are more tongue in cheek....

 

What prompted this poll is the following (ex my post in the Attakwas thread)...

 

 

 

On going through the SS results, it appears that someone might have been a naughty boy.

 

The SS winner, Nico Van Zyl rode the last +-36k's from Waterpoint 4 in a time of +- 1hr 52m. However, there appears to have been a rider that rode the last 36km's in a time of 47 minutes which meant he went from 12th position at waterpoint 4 to 6th position at the finish.

 

By comparison, the overall race winner Urs Huber was 30 minutes slower than that rider and took a pedestrian 1hr 17minutes for the same distance.

 

I don't know what logical reason there would be for being 30 minutes quicker than the overall race winner.

 

BTW, there is a picture of the offending individual crossing the finish line on his bicycle.

 

edit: took out the individuals race number.

 

I say a timing issue , or he got a lift back ...............in a very fast bakkie :whistling:

Posted

If you take out the last time check is the result an issue, is the oke capable of that time?

 

Otherwise I suppose some motor vehicle assistance would have been required.

Posted

Is it possible that he took the wrong turnoff unintentionally ? At a USN race last year I finished with the front dudes on my SS :eek:

 

Ha ha yes it happens and can be genuinely innocent...the trick question is did he report "something innocent happened" to the event organizers on the day?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout