Jump to content

Adverse analytical finding - in competition test


News bot

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 153
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Joe who?

Better be careful, sarcasm is not allowed .

 

Good to see them catching one of the many vet racers 'competing' at the sharp end of vets racing who are juiced up.

:thumbup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yip, and lots of male tandem wins

Yip, Happens to be an ex sa champ. Think it was about 3 years ago he won. BUT he is no longer riding with the guy he won with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cycling South Africa reports that veteran cyclist Joe van der Westhuizen returned an adverse analytical finding in an in-competition test conducted by the South African Institute for Drug-Free Sport (SAIDS) on 4 October 2014 at the Engen Cycle in the City Race.

 

Click here to view the article

Hectic! As someone who has raced against Joe on many occasions over the last year or so, I actually don't know what to say  :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The analytical report confirmed the presence of the Anabolic Agent, Clenbuterol as well as the Glucocorticosteroid, Prednisone and its metabolite Prednisolone"

 

That is no small amount of serious drugs which got there on purpose.

 

This is the sort of cheating that is deliberate and devious and deserves a life time ban from racing. By this I mean a racing licence. I have no problem with a banned doper returning to UNseeded funriding after a few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jaaayyyyyy....I move into 3rd possie now on that crit.

Wonder if Joe will refund me the difference in winnings?  :ph34r:

 

**** it's funny that Vets have to dope to be competitive in SA.....I mean if you loose then you loose.....better luck next time and a challenge to train harder and smarter........ :rolleyes:  :lol:  :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The analytical report confirmed the presence of the Anabolic Agent, Clenbuterol as well as the Glucocorticosteroid, Prednisone and its metabolite Prednisolone"

 

That is no small amount of serious drugs which got there on purpose.

 

This is the sort of cheating that is deliberate and devious and deserves a life time ban from racing. By this I mean a racing licence. I have no problem with a banned doper returning to UNseeded funriding after a few years.

I was wondering the same thing.......

That is sure a pretty big mix of things.  Glen we all know from Contador and Chilliboy rugby dude......

The other stuff sounds like medicine. 

 

So it is hard to take a judgemental note if you don't know what he took? 

 

Anyone with decent knowledge on this that can speculate?  Was it deliberate or just a decent steak from blue-bull country?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jaaayyyyyy....I move into 3rd possie now on that crit.

Wonder if Joe will refund me the difference in winnings?  :ph34r:

 

**** it's funny that Vets have to dope to be competitive in SA.....I mean if you loose then you loose.....better luck next time and a challenge to train harder and smarter........ :rolleyes:  :lol:  :lol:

I think the biggest problem with doping in this country is in the vets and sub vets cat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are there any previously banned dopers from the elites/VA/VB groups now languishing in the fun ride groups after their return?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are there any previously banned dopers from the elites/VA/VB groups now languishing in the fun ride groups after their return?

 

Good question.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was wondering the same thing.......

That is sure a pretty big mix of things.  Glen we all know from Contador and Chilliboy rugby dude......

The other stuff sounds like medicine. 

 

So it is hard to take a judgemental note if you don't know what he took? 

 

Anyone with decent knowledge on this that can speculate?  Was it deliberate or just a decent steak from blue-bull country?

 

Report says he waived his right to a hearing. If he had taken the stuff under doctor's prescription for a medical issue, I would imagine he would at least have a hearing to present mitigating circumstances in hope of a lesser sanction.

 

If any of the substances were subject to a TUE then they would be excluded from the finding.

 

The contents of the press release appear pretty damning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout