Jump to content

Dopers suck


fandacious

Recommended Posts

Honest question though... how would you know? I'd assume you coach a few, but outside of your guys?

From my understanding the testing is almost non-existent, there is a fair amount of money to throw around, and a equal dose of ego and competition to add to the mix.

 

Unfortunately I don't know as it is pointed out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Unfortunately I don't know as it is pointed out. 

hahahaha 

 

You just made my day!

 

Doping is like buying followers on Instagram.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bikehub logic....Pro peloton is clean but licenced and Engen riders are not. Comedy gold :clap:

JCZA logic. A few opinions now equals BikeHub logic. Cynicism gold.

 

Neither are clean.

Edited by Patchelicious
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately I don't know as it is pointed out. 

Hope no offence was taken, just an honest question - your insights are always greatly valued  :thumbup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really have an issue with Valverde winning. It was a great and exciting race. And he rode it perfectly. He doped, paid the price, came back. I'd like to think that current doping controls means he can't still be doping, so too most the peleton. (I believe in fairy tales)

 

My only issue is how people can crucify 1 rider as an ex-doper and others are regarded as heroes. Should all be equal.

 

I suppose at the end of the day, it's who we like and who we don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really have an issue with Valverde winning. It was a great and exciting race. And he rode it perfectly. He doped, paid the price, came back. I'd like to think that current doping controls means he can't still be doping, so too most the peleton. (I believe in fairy tales)

 

My only issue is how people can crucify 1 rider as an ex-doper and others are regarded as heroes. Should all be equal.

 

I suppose at the end of the day, it's who we like and who we don't.

 

Some are more equal than others...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really have an issue with Valverde winning. It was a great and exciting race. And he rode it perfectly. He doped, paid the price, came back. I'd like to think that current doping controls means he can't still be doping, so too most the peleton. (I believe in fairy tales)

 

My only issue is how people can crucify 1 rider as an ex-doper and others are regarded as heroes. Should all be equal.

 

I suppose at the end of the day, it's who we like and who we don't.

He never admitted the doping, he just took a holiday in 2011. 

 

As if the biggest bust in doping never happened, zero remorse. Thats why people dont like him. 

 

We crucify people that have never tested positive but this bell end wins a world champs after being popped and we supposed to be like, meh, well done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout