b-rad Posted September 13, 2020 Posted September 13, 2020 The other flip side is that September is also renowned for very cold fronts with snowWhich might not be such a bad thing? We all know DBN isn't exactly the coldest place even during a cold front Probably not even less than 10 degrees down that way. Then again we're probably too used to the cold European weather Lexx and Stretch 2
Stretch Posted September 13, 2020 Posted September 13, 2020 Which might not be such a bad thing? We all know DBN isn't exactly the coldest place even during a cold front Probably not even less than 10 degrees down that way. Then again we're probably too used to the cold European weather Maritzburugh would be icey though!! I can't remember if it's a down or up run
Ronniek Posted September 14, 2020 Posted September 14, 2020 Maritzburugh would be icey though!! I can't remember if it's a down or up runWouldn’t it be a down run next year as well?
Jackes Posted September 14, 2020 Posted September 14, 2020 Peak training through our winter is going to be fun... NOT mecheng89, Andrew Steer and Lexx 3
Craai Posted September 14, 2020 Posted September 14, 2020 Peak training through our winter is going to be fun... NOT TBH I prefer running in the cold as opposed to summer heat
Stretch Posted September 14, 2020 Posted September 14, 2020 (edited) Ran my virtual Boston Marathon yesterday. Never had a plan to go out to break any PB's or anything.. Just planned to take a nice easy sub 8 min mile run and finish the marathon under 3:30. Let me tell you running a marathon on your own without any crowds with a set goal is a lot harder than anticipated. Not feeling in the zone on the day didn't help either. I knew it was going to be a long day when I was feeling uncomfortable at 8 miles in to the run and my heart rate was about 10 bpm higher then it normally would be at that pace. I managed to plod along at my goal pace till about 23 miles, but those last three miles were not fun at all with a few strategic walks. Still managed to finish in my time, and I was glad to have done it. It was definitely a wake up call for the hilly marathon I have in November! Edited September 14, 2020 by Stretch Frosty, Duane_Bosch, ChrisF and 10 others 13
b-rad Posted September 14, 2020 Posted September 14, 2020 (edited) Ran my virtual Boston Marathon yesterday. Never had a plan to go out to break any PB's or anything.. Just planned to take a nice easy sub 8 min mile run and finish the marathon under 3:30. Let me tell you running a marathon on your own without any crowds with a set goal is a lot harder than anticipated. Not feeling in the zone on the day didn't help either. I knew it was going to be a long day when I was feeling uncomfortable at 8 miles in to the run and my heart rate was about 10 bpm higher then it normally would be at that pace. I managed to plod along at my goal pace till about 23 miles, but those last three miles were not fun at all with a few strategic walks. Still managed to finish in my time, and I was glad to have done it. It was definitely a wake up call for the hilly marathon I have in November!Nicely done!! Different story without the normal race day vibes. Which marathon have you entered? I'm looking out for a November/December European marathon to enter. I haven't looked into much detail on the options yet but was looking at Malaga in mid December. Looks like it's still on but Valencia which was meant to be a week earlier has been cancelled. Edited September 14, 2020 by b-rad
Stretch Posted September 14, 2020 Posted September 14, 2020 Nicely done!! Different story without the normal race day vibes. Which marathon have you entered? I'm looking out for a November/December European marathon to enter. I haven't looked into much detail on the options yet but was looking at Malaga in mid December. Looks like it's still on but Valencia which was meant to be a week earlier has been cancelled.It's just a local marathon restricted to 200 entrants. It's the gap of dunloe marathon. You basically run up and down 3 big hills. Not massive ascent... About 800m... But enough to make it a hard morning out
mecheng89 Posted September 16, 2020 Posted September 16, 2020 Anyone familiar with running power? I've been interested in it for quite some time, but the only few ways to get access to numbers are to purchase some hardware like Stryd, the Garmin Running pod that clips to your shorts, or the Garmin HRM-TRI strap. I see Wahoo has brought out the next generation of their TICKR and TICKR X models, and from their blurb the TICKR X can now do the whole ground contact etc etc tracking. Will it give me my running power?
Frosty Posted September 16, 2020 Posted September 16, 2020 The Garmin HRM-Tri on its own does not give power, but there is an app that works on your Garmin. Vetplant 1
Dinamic Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 Anyone familiar with running power? I've been interested in it for quite some time, but the only few ways to get access to numbers are to purchase some hardware like Stryd, the Garmin Running pod that clips to your shorts, or the Garmin HRM-TRI strap. I see Wahoo has brought out the next generation of their TICKR and TICKR X models, and from their blurb the TICKR X can now do the whole ground contact etc etc tracking. Will it give me my running power?The STRYD might seem pricey up front but I have athletes that have used the same one day in day out for over three years without issue. When you add in the undisputed accuracy, the additional metrics like form power, Leg spring stiffness and now with the ability to take wind into account it is a steal. Think about how much you pay for running shoes which you will change every 6 months or so.There is a reason some of the worlds top Triathletes and Runners are using STRYD.
Pieter-za Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 (edited) When you add in the undisputed accuracyAccuracy of what? A possible arbitrary measurement? https://www.outsideonline.com/2413011/running-power-meter-comparison-study As I wrote in 2018, the concept of power has no useful intrinsic definition in running, since each stride consists of a mishmash of positive, negative, internal, and external power as your legs and arms swing backwards and forwards, your tendons stretch and recoil, and so on. Instead, what people think of as running power is basically an analogy to cycling power, where the power applied to the pedals has a consistent relationship to how much energy you’re burning and thus how sustainable your effort is. As a result, my conclusion in 2018 was that a running power meter is useful only insofar as it successfully tracks VO2—which, as it happens, was precisely what Stryd was trying to rig its algorithm to do. Edited September 17, 2020 by Pieter-za
Dinamic Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 Accuracy of what? A possible arbitrary measurement? https://www.outsideonline.com/2413011/running-power-meter-comparison-study Ok if you want to be pedantic call it an accurate measurement of Vo2. It still gives the best measurement of effort over real time compared to HR / Pace. By the way the the the the quote you used was made by Alex Hutchinson in 2018, As the link you kindly supplied showed he did a further article in 2020 which concluded. "But for now, if you’re in the market for a running power device—and if what you really mean by that is a consistently repeatable estimate of oxygen consumption—this data suggests that Stryd is your best bet." This was based on his reading off a study published in the European Journal of Sport Science which concluded that Stryd was " the most repeatable technology for all environment, with the best concurrent validity to Vo2. STRYD is the most recommended tool. We encourage practitioners to use this device." So call the metric what you want, for ease of communication we are saying power, does it allow athletes to better understand their pacing, there efficiency, there form? Anecdotal evidence from the athletes I have personally worked with it yes, because it is accurate, consistent and repeatable. tjommies3 1
travisza Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 (edited) Anyone familiar with running power? I've been interested in it for quite some time, but the only few ways to get access to numbers are to purchase some hardware like Stryd, the Garmin Running pod that clips to your shorts, or the Garmin HRM-TRI strap. I see Wahoo has brought out the next generation of their TICKR and TICKR X models, and from their blurb the TICKR X can now do the whole ground contact etc etc tracking. Will it give me my running power? If you're in the market for a new Smart Watch you could also check out the COROS Pace 2. Running watch with power (which seems very close to Stryd) with no need for additional pods etc. https://www.dcrainmaker.com/2020/09/coros-pace-2-in-depth-review-multisport-running-power.html its an interesting option if running power is what you are looking for Edited September 17, 2020 by travisza
Pieter-za Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 So call the metric what you want, for ease of communication we are saying power, does it allow athletes to better understand their pacing, there efficiency, there form? Anecdotal evidence from the athletes I have personally worked with it yes, because it is accurate, consistent and repeatable.Yip - the scientist in me is a bit pedantic We can't just interchange scientific terms because it is convenient or good for marketing. I am not disputing the benefits and the fact that it is consistent, usable etc etc, but - as you also pointed out quoting the latest study - it is not power. (I think Stryd should rather call it something else, as it is a misnomer. VOwer might be a good one
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now