Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I organize MTB races. I want to give the rider an unforgettable experience in terms of scenery, varied terrain, lots of singletrack, a nice challenge to riders of ALL capability/levels and to promote fun whilst riding/competing.

 

Then I get the following question:

 

..is the route technical?

 

How do you answer a person that has spend R10k+ (in most cases MUCH, much more) on equipment and time and a whole lot other expenses over a number of years yet NEVER took the time to go for a basic course in skills and bike handling - almost like a golfer who never went for lessons and fades the ball for the past 10 years playing off a 24 handicap and don't understand why his handicap is not coming down.

 

To all those riders who complain race after race that it was too technical, this is what you must #*****ing do.....:(

 

I am the wrong person to answer that question....so hubbers plse assist...awaiting your kind journey into the world of wisdom :)

 

Cheers

 

Naas

  • Replies 110
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

This is going to be entertaining...

 

Personally I love technical stuff, if it looks too hectic, I'll try anyway and fail, if I fall, I if I fall/fail, I'll walk passed it and ride till I fall again, or not. I haven't been for any skills courses.

 

Maybe you should tell them to try road races, they're never technical.

Posted

I have been mountainbiking for about 8 years and I think that the average Joe's skills and fitness have improved over time. I also enjoy the more technical stuff, never been to a skills clinic. Not because I don't think I will benefit from it, only because nothing available here in the platteland. I try to learn online and practice what I see on youtube. Luckily we have a few technical spots on our 2 River course here in Bothaville to try and stay sharp.

Posted

 

How do you answer a person that has spend R10k+ (in most cases MUCH, much more) on equipment and time and a whole lot other expenses over a number of years yet NEVER took the time to go for a basic course in skills and bike handling - almost like a golfer who never went for lessons and fades the ball for the past 10 years playing off a 24 handicap and don't understand why his handicap is not coming down.

 

To all those riders who complain race after race that it was too technical, this is what you must #*****ing do..... :(

 

Naas

 

 

To be fair, most riders out there do not have 10 years of experience behind them. It's a growing sport with lots of newbies and semi-newbies...

 

My personal take, if I want to ride really technical stuff I go hit a trail on my own or with my buddies where I can ride at my own pace, Races, I prefer them less technical because of the masses riding with me.

Posted

What is deemed as technical?

It's highly subjective, that.

 

There are also so many aspects to technicality. It can be an abundance of switchbacks, off camber corners, jumps, dropoffs, rock gardens, loose shale, rooted sections, sandy trail, northshore and so on and so forth.

 

To say a trail is "technical" is a difficult thing to do, as "technically" (lol) anything above straight, flat singletrack qualifies as technical in somebody's mind.

Posted

Some riders like technical routes, others, often beginners and older cyclists, prefer milder stuff. I think it is a valid question to ask before participating. You should be happy that your event is getting interest and replying to possible entrants with as much info as possible.

A big problem with races and trails in general is the lack of a sensible trail rating system, at least the ones I've ridden. One person's blue is another's red or even black. Trail running has an excellent system which tells any entrant the exact nature of the trail. Skiing also has an old and well known system. Either could be easily adapted for mountain biking. Have a look at the: Wildrunner Trail Grading System.

Posted

Technicality is a definitely a subjective matter, as mentioned above, every person is different and has their own likes/dislikes about trails that they ride. Maybe a review system could be introduced after every race?

 

An idea:

Select a few riders from each competence level from each route (look at times taken to complete the race) and send them a thanks for participating email and ask them to rate the technical aspects of the ride from 1-5.

This way we could get a feel of the level of technicality from a number of different levels of riders and based on their responses a rating can be given to each race/race route from beginner to expert.

 

IMHO, the more technical the better. You have to try new things in order to improve, even if that means seeing your gat a coupe of times in the process

Posted

See, there you go Wannabee..I want to know from you guys! Give us some grading scale or whatever...

 

By the way, your friends told me it's technical for you to get ON a bike... :)

 

Asked them so nicely not to divulge that kinda information. :blush:

Some friends I have. :ph34r: :D

 

I dunno what technical is. I ride where I can, otherwise I get off and walk / push to where I can ride again. :devil: :ph34r:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout