Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
49 minutes ago, JA-Q001 said:

I always find it interesting in the local racing bunches, when some of the guys get closer to the front and ask, "is there a break up the road?" after the bunch have been chasing for 30km.

At CTCT I found it impossible to stay at or near the front consistently. Here the number of riders in the bunch and the quality of the field is about as close as I'll ever get to a WT situation. Every time I got absorbed into the fold and managed to get back to the front I needed fresh info. ????‍♂️

Posted
Just now, J Wakefield said:

 

Correctly said. You learning.????

 

You are winning them over one at a time .... :P

 

 

John your memoirs would make some seriously good reading ..... I can just see you smiling at some of the posts ....

 

Posted
On 11/11/2021 at 3:30 PM, J Wakefield said:

Not defending anyone but sounds like his crash here was the biggest variable in him stopping and what is a pill? Paracetamol? Caffeine? 

My take home from reading some points in the article is that he lost the knack and balls to get stuck in, nothing wrong with that atall, it happens and the peloton is a crazy place but he was simply not into it, regardless of any apparent pills. 

" I crashed last year in Randers Bike Week," he told Feltet.dk. The event is a four-day race for all levels of amateurs and professionals. "The crash itself was at high speed, but I didn't hurt myself too badly. But in my head it was much worse than it really was."

""Then it all went wrong at the 2020 Danish championships, where I ... sat too far back because I was too cautious. Then I just stood there on the side of the road with my mum and dad. The next day I called Sunweb and said I didn't want to continue there, even though they had talked to me about an extension. I had to go home."

"I was actually in good shape for the upcoming season this year, but when we reached the first race, I was just completely switched off mentally and was actually scared. I don't know what caused it. The pattern repeated itself afterwards, where I was going strong in training, but as soon as I got a number on my back it went the wrong way, where I was afraid of crashing."

"I lacked motivation. Suddenly going to work was fun, and then maybe going out to train on a January night in Copenhagen wasn't so fun. It's not very exciting to train in Copenhagen. I'm used to training around Roskilde, where my parents live and it's really nice, but here it's just the same main roads," he said.

but whats in a pill in what ever the form gives others that edge....be in a placebo effect...exhausted rider as well...

Posted (edited)
13 hours ago, Eldron said:

The question is: Do we really want that? Do we really want ultra measured riders who are guided only by the numbers? Drones covered in sensors who ride Froome style with both eyes firmly on the 9" iPad on their bars...

That would be boring as fark. 

 

 

 

 

Edited by SwissVan
Posted

Imo it is high time the weight limit on bikes is revised to someting like 5kg. The benefit of power meters, electonic shifting, aero frames, wide rims and disk brakes will be measured against mass added.

Posted
2 hours ago, Christie said:

Imo it is high time the weight limit on bikes is revised to someting like 5kg. The benefit of power meters, electonic shifting, aero frames, wide rims and disk brakes will be measured against mass added.

That will result in a lot of unsafe to ride frames. Frames are still breaking at the  6.8kg limit.

What they should be doing is regulating the minimum weight of the frames and minimum weight of the fork to lets say 1000grams and 380grams respectively. Then frames would last longer, be more reliable, comfortable and potentially more cost effective 

Posted
On 11/16/2021 at 7:20 AM, DieselnDust said:

That will result in a lot of unsafe to ride frames. Frames are still breaking at the  6.8kg limit.

What they should be doing is regulating the minimum weight of the frames and minimum weight of the fork to lets say 1000grams and 380grams respectively. Then frames would last longer, be more reliable, comfortable and potentially more cost effective 

Why can't bikes/frames simply be tested according to some international standard like Euro NCAP for cars? Let them be as light as you want, as long as they meet the required standard? Would make a lot more sense than having a stupid UCI sticker on the frame.

Posted
8 minutes ago, TNT1 said:

Why can't bikes/frames simply be tested according to some international standard like Euro NCAP for cars? Let them be as light as you want, as long as they meet the required standard? Would make a lot more sense than having a stupid UCI sticker on the frame.

Because then the bike industry will charge us $1,000,000-00 for a frame ( yes Spazilised I’m talking to you) to pay for the lobbying costs of the bike industry agreeing on a standard, it will also take 500years so maybe with inflation this is not so bad. Then once the standard is agreed Spez will sue everybody for patent infringement 

Posted
On 11/12/2021 at 10:20 AM, Eldron said:

The question is: Do we really want that? Do we really want ultra measured riders who are guided only by the numbers? Drones covered in sensors who ride Froome style with both eyes firmly on the 9" iPad on their bars...

That would be boring as fark. 

I don't agree at all.  For me its a matter of principle.  You can not ban someone from having/getting INFORMATION, what they do with it or don't do with it is up to them to decide.

It is a fundamental right for anyone to have/get whatever information/data they can/want in whatever possible situation they are.  That is not doping, that is being informed to act on it if you want.

Posted
14 minutes ago, TheoG said:

I don't agree at all.  For me its a matter of principle.  You can not ban someone from having/getting INFORMATION, what they do with it or don't do with it is up to them to decide.

It is a fundamental right for anyone to have/get whatever information/data they can/want in whatever possible situation they are.  That is not doping, that is being informed to act on it if you want.

In principle I agree with you but practically it would start a tech war (that Ineos would probably win) and it would make racing even more formulaic and boring.

It's a "careful what you wish for" scenario in my opinion.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Settings My Forum Content My Followed Content Forum Settings Ad Messages My Ads My Favourites My Saved Alerts My Pay Deals Help Logout